Technology
OpenAI’s ex-policy lead criticizes the company for ‘rewriting’ its AI safety history

A high-profile ex-OpenAI policy researcher, Miles Brundage, took to social media on Wednesday to criticize OpenAI for “rewriting the history” of its deployment approach to potentially risky AI systems.
Earlier this week, OpenAI published a document outlining its current philosophy on AI safety and alignment, the process of designing AI systems that behave in desirable and explainable ways. In the document, OpenAI said that it sees the development of AGI, broadly defined as AI systems that can perform any task a human can, as a “continuous path” that requires “iteratively deploying and learning” from AI technologies.
“In a discontinuous world […] safety lessons come from treating the systems of today with outsized caution relative to their apparent power, [which] is the approach we took for [our AI model] GPT‑2,” OpenAI wrote. “We now view the first AGI as just one point along a series of systems of increasing usefulness […] In the continuous world, the way to make the next system safe and beneficial is to learn from the current system.”
But Brundage claims that GPT-2 did, in fact, warrant abundant caution at the time of its release, and that this was “100% consistent” with OpenAI’s iterative deployment strategy today.
“OpenAI’s release of GPT-2, which I was involved in, was 100% consistent [with and] foreshadowed OpenAI’s current philosophy of iterative deployment,” Brundage wrote in a post on X. “The model was released incrementally, with lessons shared at each step. Many security experts at the time thanked us for this caution.”
Brundage, who joined OpenAI as a research scientist in 2018, was the company’s head of policy research for several years. On OpenAI’s “AGI readiness” team, he had a particular focus on the responsible deployment of language generation systems such as OpenAI’s AI chatbot platform ChatGPT.
GPT-2, which OpenAI announced in 2019, was a progenitor of the AI systems powering ChatGPT. GPT-2 could answer questions about a topic, summarize articles, and generate text on a level sometimes indistinguishable from that of humans.
While GPT-2 and its outputs may look basic today, they were cutting-edge at the time. Citing the risk of malicious use, OpenAI initially refused to release GPT-2’s source code, opting instead of give selected news outlets limited access to a demo.
The decision was met with mixed reviews from the AI industry. Many experts argued that the threat posed by GPT-2 had been exaggerated, and that there wasn’t any evidence the model could be abused in the ways OpenAI described. AI-focused publication The Gradient went so far as to publish an open letter requesting that OpenAI release the model, arguing it was too technologically important to hold back.
OpenAI eventually did release a partial version of GPT-2 six months after the model’s unveiling, followed by the full system several months after that. Brundage thinks this was the right approach.
“What part of [the GPT-2 release] was motivated by or premised on thinking of AGI as discontinuous? None of it,” he said in a post on X. “What’s the evidence this caution was ‘disproportionate’ ex ante? Ex post, it prob. would have been OK, but that doesn’t mean it was responsible to YOLO it [sic] given info at the time.”
Brundage fears that OpenAI’s aim with the document is to set up a burden of proof where “concerns are alarmist” and “you need overwhelming evidence of imminent dangers to act on them.” This, he argues, is a “very dangerous” mentality for advanced AI systems.
“If I were still working at OpenAI, I would be asking why this [document] was written the way it was, and what exactly OpenAI hopes to achieve by poo-pooing caution in such a lop-sided way,” Brundage added.
OpenAI has historically been accused of prioritizing “shiny products” at the expense of safety, and of rushing product releases to beat rival companies to market. Last year, OpenAI dissolved its AGI readiness team, and a string of AI safety and policy researchers departed the company for rivals.
Competitive pressures have only ramped up. Chinese AI lab DeepSeek captured the world’s attention with its openly available R1 model, which matched OpenAI’s o1 “reasoning” model on a number of key benchmarks. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has admitted that DeepSeek has lessened OpenAI’s technological lead, and said that OpenAI would “pull up some releases” to better compete.
There’s a lot of money on the line. OpenAI loses billions annually, and the company has reportedly projected that its annual losses could triple to $14 billion by 2026. A faster product release cycle could benefit OpenAI’s bottom line near-term, but possibly at the expense of safety long-term. Experts like Brundage question whether the trade-off is worth it.

A blog which focuses on business, Networth, Technology, Entrepreneurship, Self Improvement, Celebrities, Top Lists, Travelling, Health, and lifestyle. A source that provides you with each and every top piece of information about the world. We cover various different topics.
Technology
YouTube prepares crackdown on ‘mass-produced’ and ‘repetitive’ videos, as concern over AI slop grows

YouTube is preparing to update its policies to crack down on creators’ ability to generate revenue from “inauthentic” content, including mass-produced videos and other types of repetitive content — things that have become easier to generate with the help of AI technology.
On July 15, the company will update its YouTube Partner Program (YPP) Monetization policies with more detailed guidelines around what type of content can earn creators money and what cannot.
The exact policy language itself has not yet been released, but a page on YouTube’s Help documentation explains that creators have always been required to upload “original” and “authentic” content. The update says that the new language will help creators to better understand what “inauthentic” content looks like today.
Some YouTube creators were concerned that the update would limit their ability to monetize certain types of videos, like reaction videos or those featuring clips, but a post from YouTube Head of Editorial & Creator Liaison, Rene Ritchie, says that’s not the case.
In a video update published on Tuesday, Ritchie says that the change is just a “minor update” to YouTube’s longstanding YPP policies and is designed to better identify when content is mass-produced or repetitive.
Plus, Ritchie adds, this type of content has been ineligible for monetization for years, as it’s content that viewers often consider spam.
What Ritche is not saying, however, is how much easier it is to create such videos these days.
With the rise of AI technology, YouTube has become flooded with AI slop, a term referencing low-quality media or content made using generative AI technology. For instance, it’s common to find an AI voice overlaid on photos, video clips, or other repurposed content, thanks to text-to-video AI tools. Some channels filled with AI music have millions of subscribers. Fake, AI-generated videos about news events, like the Diddy trial, have racked up millions of views.
In another example, a true crime murder series on YouTube that went viral was found to be entirely AI-generated, 404 Media reported earlier this year. Even YouTube CEO Neal Mohan’s likeness was used in an AI-generated phishing scam on the site, despite having tools in place that allow users to report deepfake videos.
While YouTube may downplay the coming changes as a “minor” update or clarification, the reality is that allowing this type of content to grow and its creators to profit could ultimately damage YouTube’s reputation and value. It’s no surprise, then, that the company wants clear policies in place that allow it to enact mass bans of AI slop creators from YPP.

A blog which focuses on business, Networth, Technology, Entrepreneurship, Self Improvement, Celebrities, Top Lists, Travelling, Health, and lifestyle. A source that provides you with each and every top piece of information about the world. We cover various different topics.
Technology
LangChain is about to become a unicorn, sources say

LangChain, an AI infrastructure startup providing tools to build and monitor LLM-powered applications, is raising a new round of funding at an approximate $1 billion valuation led by IVP, according to three sources with knowledge of the deal.
LangChain began its life in late 2022 as an open-source project founded by Harrison Chase, who was then an engineer at machine learning startup Robust Intelligence. After generating significant developer interest, Chase transformed the project into a startup, securing a $10 million seed round from Benchmark in April 2023. That round was followed a week later by a $25 million Series A led by Sequoia, reportedly valuing LangChain at $200 million.
The startup was an early darling of the AI era. When LangChain first emerged, LLMs lacked access to real-time information and the ability to perform actions such as searching the web, calling APIs, and interacting with databases. The startup’s open-source code solved those problems with a framework for building apps on top of LLM models. It became a hugely popular project on GitHub (111K stars, over 18,000 forks).
The LLM ecosystem has since expanded significantly, with new startups including LlamaIndex, Haystack, and AutoGPT now offering comparable features. Furthermore, leading LLM providers including OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google have evolved their APIs to directly offer capabilities that were once key differentiators for LangChain’s core technology.
So the company has added other products, including LangSmith, a separate, closed-source product for observability, evaluation, and monitoring of LLM applications, specifically agents. This product has soared in popularity, multiple people tell us.
Since its introduction last year, LangSmith has led the company to reach annual recurring revenue (ARR) between $12 million and $16 million, four sources told TechCrunch. The company didn’t respond to a request for comment. Developers can start working with LangSmith for free and upgrade to $39 per month for small team collaboration features, according to the company’s website. LangChain also offers custom plans for large organizations.
Companies who use LangSmith include Klarna, Rippling, and Replit.
While LangSmith currently leads the burgeoning LLM operations space, it does have competitors like smaller, open-source Langfuse and Helicone. IVP declined to comment on this report.

A blog which focuses on business, Networth, Technology, Entrepreneurship, Self Improvement, Celebrities, Top Lists, Travelling, Health, and lifestyle. A source that provides you with each and every top piece of information about the world. We cover various different topics.
Technology
Nothing Phone (3) review | TechCrunch

Carl Pei led electronics manufacturer OnePlus from being a scrappy brand for tech enthusiasts offering affordable phones to one that produces multiple lines of devices, including flagship phones that challenge Samsung and Apple. He is running a similar playbook with Nothing, a five-year-old, venture-backed hardware startup that just launched its most ambitious device, the Phone (3), earlier this month. The phone, priced at $799, is intended to compete with devices from Samsung and Apple.
While OnePlus focused on providing value-for-money specifications and experience in its early days, Nothing focused on design and software as a differentiator to stand out from other phones. The startup produces eye-catching devices with a transparent design that draws attention.
As my former TechCrunch colleague Brian Heater said, Nothing Phone (1) was cool, and the Phone (2) was a robust mid-range device while maintaining the novelty. The Phone (3), while maintaining the transparent design ethos, invokes mixed emotions towards its design.
The phone has a lot of asymmetric elements on the back, including the strangely arranged camera module. If you look at the reactions on the internet, some people liked it because it is not like other phones, while some hated it. If you can get over the asymmetrical arrangement, you might like the device.
Nothing also took away the glyph LED arrangement that was prominent in previous Nothing phones. This arrangement made devices stand out even more when they illuminated to indicate an incoming call or a message. Over the years, the company made it more customizable, allowing you to assign different patterns for different contacts. It even created an SDK for developers, which didn’t take off.

With Phone (3) the LED arrangement is substituted with Glyph Matrix, a circle-shaped second screen in the top right-hand corner to display more information. It can display basic information such as time and battery level when you press the button on the back.
The company has also included mini apps such as spin the bottle, a stopwatch, and rock, paper, and scissors. This is more of a fun gimmick that you might use to show off your phone.

A second screen on a device is not a new concept, and it doesn’t solve the problem of having to turn the phone to read the message. You can assign an emoji to a contact, but it just tells you that you got a message from that contact, but doesn’t tell you what it is. So you have to turn your phone on anyway. Is the matrix cool? Kind of. Is it useful? Not by much yet.
The company is inviting developers to build tools for it, which could improve things if there’s adoption.
Hardware and Camera
The company is using a Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 processor, built on a 4-nanometer architecture, which is a step below the Snapdragon 8 Elite used in the Galaxy S25, OnePlus 13, and Xiaomi 15 Ultra. However, in your day-to-day usage, that wouldn’t matter a lot.
The device also includes a 6.67-inch AMOLED screen with 1.5K resolution, which is protected by Gorilla Glass 7i instead of a stronger Gorilla Glass Victus. The screen is bright and has punchy colors. While it supports HDR for YouTube, Nothing said that Netflix hasn’t whitelisted its devices to run HDR content.
The Phone (3) features three 50-megapixel cameras for different purposes. The main camera has a 1/1.3-inch sensor, which is 20% bigger than Phone (2), at a f/1.68 aperture; the periscope telephoto lens offers 3x optical zoom, 6x in-sensor, and 60x digital zoom with AI Super Res Zoom; and the ultra-wide lens provides a 114-degree field of view. There’s also a 50-megapixel selfie camera with an f/2.2 aperture.
While Nothing claims that this phone is its “true flagship,” top-tier devices such as iPhones and Samsung Galaxy phones have achieved distinct camera quality with years of work. Nothing Phone (3) takes good photos, but color accuracy needs work to match other flagship phones. Plus, if the lighting was not ideal, the phone produced crushed shadows and overblown highlights in dark or bright areas of images.















The phone has a 5150mAh battery for international versions, which is good enough to last you a day of moderate to heavy usage. You can charge the device through 65W wired charging and 15W wireless charging.
AI features
Nothing debuted a customizable hardware key called the Essential Key with the Nothing Phone 3a and 3a Pro. This key ports over to the new flagship and opens up the Nothing Space app, which lets you save screenshots with notes. But strangely, you can’t save just notes.

The company is also debuting Essential search, which doubles up as an internet and web search using AI.
You can search for files and events by typing in keywords, or you can also ask a query like “Who won Wimbledon in 2024?” and then tap on the AI button to surface web results using Google’s Gemini models. This is akin to Apple integrating ChatGPT with Siri to search the web for certain queries.

Image Credits: Screenshot from TechCrunch
The phone also gets a meeting note transcriber, which records your meeting and also summarizes key points. You can trigger this by holding the Essential key and flipping the phone. You can double-press the Essential key to record a voice snippet with transcription. However, users don’t have a way to access these recordings and transcripts outside the Nothing phone, unless they explicitly export them.
In a chat with TechCrunch, CEO Pei said that smartphone is the best medium to distribute AI and the company wants to make AI features useful for users.
“We have to be really focused on building things [AI features] that are useful [for end users] and not just call our phones ‘Nothing AI phones’ with some having some image generation and call it a day,” he said. “[We are thinking about] how we can really leverage this new technology to help people. The idea is not to compete with people or to take their jobs away. How do we help people become better and also more creative?”
While this ambition is a good one to have, Nothing’s feature set, which also includes an AI-powered wallpaper generation tool, is in step with other phone makers.
Nothing’s positioning
Nothing is making the phone available through its website and Amazon in the U.S. In Canada, it’s partnering with Best Buy.
At $799, the device directly competes with the Samsung Galaxy S25, Google Pixel 9, and the iPhone 16. Since it is not being offered through wireless carrier bundles, the phone is still aimed at people buying unlocked phones and looking for alternatives to Samsung, Apple, and Google.
In India, the company’s biggest market, it is a different story since the phone starts at ₹79,999. Although the company offers discounts and exchanges, the prices are on par with or above the iPhone 16 and the Galaxy 25, depending on the seller. Initial reactions on social media suggested that the customers found the price high, which could impact the company’s sales.
Nothing has taken it upon itself to challenge Samsung and Apple of the world, but at the moment, rather than direct competition, the phone is a good, cheaper alternative to those devices.

A blog which focuses on business, Networth, Technology, Entrepreneurship, Self Improvement, Celebrities, Top Lists, Travelling, Health, and lifestyle. A source that provides you with each and every top piece of information about the world. We cover various different topics.
-
Entertainment3 weeks ago
Ivanka Trump’s daughter borrows mom’s dress for White House visit
-
Entertainment2 weeks ago
Jennifer Garner and John Miller show rare PDA at charity event
-
Technology2 weeks ago
OpenAI hires team behind AI recommendation startup Crossing Minds
-
Life Style2 weeks ago
23 Small Ways to Make Life Simpler
-
Entertainment2 weeks ago
Rob Kardashian Makes Rare Appearance on Instagram: See the Photos!
-
Entertainment2 weeks ago
Taylor Swift all smiles as she supports Travis Kelce at training camp in Nashville
-
Entertainment2 weeks ago
Margaret Cho disses ‘mean girl’ Ellen DeGeneres in scathing interview
-
Entertainment2 weeks ago
Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez keeping A-list guests in the dark about top-secret wedding events