News
Despite harsh suppression, critics make their voices heard as Putin hails election victory.
President Vladimir Putin celebrated his election victory, which was practically guaranteed, with officials announcing that he had secured his fifth term with an unprecedented number of votes, solidifying his firm grip on Russia’s political landscape.
Despite facing minimal competition and ruthlessly suppressing dissenting voices, Putin secured another six years in power.
The Central Election Commission of Russia reported that Putin garnered 87.29% of the vote with nearly all precincts counted, translating to almost 76 million votes – his highest ever tally. Putin, 71, interpreted the landslide victory as a sign of trust and hope in his leadership, while critics viewed it as yet another instance of the inevitable outcome of a predetermined election.
If Putin completes his upcoming term, he will surpass any Russian leader’s tenure since Catherine the Great in the 18th century, as noted by Agence France-Presse.
Public criticism of Putin or his activities in Ukraine has been systematically silenced. Independent media outlets have been dismantled, and prominent figures critical of Putin, like Yevgeny Prigozhin and Alexey Navalny, either perished under suspicious circumstances or face constraints like imprisonment or exile.
While the election offered voters minimal choice, impartial monitoring was severely restricted, raising concerns about the validity of the process.
Putin received congratulatory messages from global leaders like Xi Jinping, Kim Jong Un, and others, while Western nations disregarded the legitimacy of the election. British Foreign Secretary David Cameron condemned the process as not reflective of free and fair elections.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy denounced Putin as a “dictator” drunk on power, criticizing his actions and character. The voting extended to Russian-occupied territories of Ukraine drew condemnation from 50 countries, with the U.S. characterizing it as a sham election.
Despite severe suppression, critics managed to voice dissent during the election, with Russians assembling outside polling stations to express their disapproval. Notable was Yulia Navalnaya, widow of Alexey Navalny, who waited in line for hours in Berlin and inscribed her late husband’s name on her ballot.
Some Russians openly opposed Putin at the polls, with individuals like Vadim in Moscow hoping for change. However, arrests were made for various acts of protest, highlighting the challenging environment for dissent.
Supporters of Putin also showed their unwavering loyalty, reflecting the prevailing sentiment in a nation where divergent views are unwelcome. Dmitry Sergienko voiced contentment with the status quo, exemplifying the sentiments of many who endorse Putin’s governance.
The election results, while affirming Putin’s unyielding authority, also showcased the subdued undercurrent of opposition that persists despite stringent regulations. The varied responses from the public underscore the complexities and contradictions within Russia’s political landscape.
News
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and Protesters reach an agreement to dismantle encampment
Protesters at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee have agreed to end their pro-Palestinian encampment following an agreement reached with the school, university officials announced on Sunday. The encampment, which had been in place for two weeks, will be dismantled by Tuesday, marking the end of what was believed to be the last standing encampment at a Wisconsin college.
University officials had allowed the encampment to remain on a patch of lawn between Mitchell Hall and a busy thoroughfare on the campus’s southern boundary, opting not to involve law enforcement. This approach differed from the response at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where police were called in to remove tents after negotiations fell through. Despite initial efforts to disband the encampment, Wisconsin-Madison eventually reached an agreement with protesters to voluntarily dismantle the camp prior to commencement ceremonies.
Chancellor Mark Mone of Wisconsin-Milwaukee stated last Wednesday that the university had exhibited “the widest possible amount of patience and restraint.” However, he also cautioned that patience was wearing thin and hinted at potential action by the school. Following discussions with the UWM Popular University for Palestine Coalition, the university agreed to advocate for a cease-fire between Israel and Hamas, condemn the destruction of schools and universities in Gaza by Israeli forces, and hold meetings with protest leaders regarding university investments.
Additionally, the university pledged to urge the Water Council, a Milwaukee organization of water technology companies, to sever connections with two Israeli government-owned entities, Mekorot and the Israel Innovation Authority. Chancellor Mone serves as the treasurer on the Water Council’s board of directors.
In return for these commitments, the protesters agreed to dismantle the encampment beginning on Sunday and completing the process by Tuesday. They also agreed not to disrupt the university’s commencement ceremonies scheduled for Sunday. In a statement, the protesters expressed their satisfaction with the agreement, stating, “After hard fought edits and careful consideration by the coalition, we determined we had obtained all possible benefits from the encampment.”
The resolution of the encampment at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee represents a successful outcome of negotiations between university officials and protesters. By reaching a compromise that addresses the concerns of both parties, a peaceful resolution has been achieved, allowing for the encampment to be taken down without incident.