President Biden’s recent statement conveying his outrage and heartbreak over the tragic killing of seven aid workers in Gaza has raised questions about whether he is willing to use America’s leverage with Israel to address the situation. The White House has thus far remained silent on whether Biden’s anger will lead to imposing conditions on the weapons sent to Israel, despite the tense relationship between Biden and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Senator Chris Van Hollen has long advocated for placing restrictions on the arms supplied to Israel, highlighting the need for accountability in how American weapons are used. While conditions on arms usage are not uncommon, Israel has historically been an exception to these regulations. Even influential figures like Senator Chuck Schumer have been hesitant to call for limits on arms shipments to Israel.

In light of the recent attack on the aid workers in Gaza, there is growing pressure on President Biden to take decisive action. Calls for increased accountability and oversight on aid deliveries in conflict zones have intensified, with suggestions such as requiring IDF escort for aid convoys and improved communication with aid providers.

The Biden administration’s engagement with Israeli officials following the attack highlights the importance of ensuring a comprehensive plan for safe evacuation of refugees in conflict zones. While there are concerns about Israel’s readiness for such operations, the dialogue between the two countries continues as they navigate a delicate balance of support and accountability.

Despite mounting frustration over Israel’s military campaigns, President Biden has stopped short of openly confronting Prime Minister Netanyahu. The reluctance to take a strong stance reflects a broader challenge of balancing support for Israel’s security with the need to address humanitarian concerns and ensure accountability for actions that endanger civilian lives.

While Biden’s expression of outrage over the killing of aid workers has resonated with many, critics caution that true empathy must extend to all affected populations, including Palestinians. The disparity in responses to different incidents underscores the complex dynamics at play in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the challenges of navigating U.S. foreign policy in the region.

As pressure mounts for a more robust policy response, observers remain skeptical about whether Biden’s strong words will translate into tangible actions. The delicate balance of power and diplomacy complicates the path to meaningful change, with concerns lingering about the humanitarian impact of escalating conflicts in the region.

Katie Rogers contributed reporting.