As Nithya Raman fights for reelection in a test for progressives, the race for the Hollywood Hills on the Los Angeles City Council has become the center of attention once again. Four years ago, Raman and her opponent sparred over who had the strongest credentials as political progressives, with Raman eventually emerging victorious as the first member of the Democratic Socialists of America to oust an incumbent at City Hall.

Now, as she seeks a second term in Tuesday’s election, Raman faces a more complex political landscape. Two opponents are challenging her, some activists criticize her from the left, and a surge of outside money has made it the most expensive L.A. City Council contest this year. The outcome of the race, with over $2.6 million in total spending, will impact the future of the progressive vision embraced by Raman and her allies at City Hall.

Councilmember Hugo Soto-Martínez noted that this vision includes measures to reduce evictions, expand renter relocation payments, and launch transportation initiatives. Raman, a self-proclaimed “pragmatic progressive,” has supported all these efforts and has been a champion on tenant issues, homelessness, and housing.

On the other hand, her opponent, Deputy City Atty. Ethan Weaver, describes himself as a “pragmatic Democrat” and criticizes Raman for being too far left on key issues like homelessness and public safety. Weaver emphasizes his support for laws against homeless encampments near schools and police raises to boost recruitment.

Despite criticism, Raman continues to support Inside Safe and other compassionate efforts while focusing on making LAHSA more effective in addressing homelessness. The race has attracted unprecedented financial support, with police and firefighter unions backing Weaver and Raman being targeted for her stance against special interests.

As the election nears, both candidates are making their case to voters. Raman highlights her record on tenant protections and homelessness reduction, citing drops in crime rates in her district. Weaver, however, paints a different picture, pointing out ongoing concerns about homelessness and personal safety.

The presence of a third candidate, Levon Baronian, adds another dimension to the race, making a November runoff more likely. While the campaigns have been marked by heavy spending and outside influences, each candidate is striving to connect with voters and secure their support.

Ultimately, the election will determine the course of progressive politics in L.A. and the future of the Hollywood Hills district. As Raman fights to retain her seat, the outcome will have far-reaching implications for the city and its residents. Whether voters opt for continuity with Raman or a change with Weaver, the decision will shape the trajectory of the council and its policies for the years to come.