News

L.A. reaches deal on cost recovery for 2028 Olympics, amid warnings

?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcalifornia times brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fee%2Fc6%2F50bb666f49f88678a21d146e42d6%2F1505607 sp olympic ceremonies 10 mjc

A divided Los Angeles City Council finalized a deal with organizers of the 2028 Summer Olympic Games aimed at controlling the city’s costs during the global event, amid complaints that the protections don’t go far enough.

On a 10-4 vote, the council approved the Enhanced City Resources Master Agreement, which lays out the process for the city to seek reimbursement for the services it provides during the Games.

City Administrative Officer Matt Szabo said the agreement sets up additional financial safeguards, by allowing the city to tap a $270-million contingency fund set up by LA28, the privately run Olympic organizing committee, if outstanding costs remain.

Still, some on the council warned that taxpayers could wind up on the hook for $1 billion in police and other public safety costs if LA28 incurs serious losses.

“This fails to provide any safeguards for Los Angeles taxpayers and most assuredly risks the city’s fiscal stability,” Councilmember Monica Rodriguez said after voting against the agreement. Councilmembers Eunisses Hernandez, Ysabel Jurado and Nithya Raman, who is running against Mayor Karen Bass, also were opposed.

Critics of the Games have long voiced concern about the risks that surround the event.

If LA28 incurs massive financial losses, the city would cover the first $270 million. The state would absorb the next $270 million. After that, the city’s general fund, which pays for basic services, would cover any remaining shortfall.

The city’s negotiating team said L.A.’s political leaders committed the city roughly a decade ago to serve as a financial backstop for the Games, as part of the contract that made L.A. the host city.

“We are providing you today as many protections as we can, given the reality that if it is not financially successful, it does fall onto us,” Szabo said. “So there is nothing we could propose today or tomorrow or next year that would eliminate that risk.”

The council, in a flurry of votes, sidelined proposals from Councilmembers Imelda Padilla, Hernandez and Raman that were billed as a way to reduce the risk facing the city.

LA28 spokesperson Jacie Prieto Lopez, in a statement, said the newly approved agreement delivers on the committee’s commitment to “execute a safe, secure and fiscally responsible Games that benefit Los Angeles for decades to come.”

Under the terms approved by the council, LA28 would pay the city ahead of the Games for services that are ineligible for reimbursement from the federal government, such as street sweeping and deployment of traffic officers.

The terms around police protection are more complicated.

The city would first seek reimbursement from the federal government for law enforcement services, particularly in high-security zones, Szabo said. If the government fails to cover the cost of security in those areas, the city would seek all or a portion of LA28’s contingency funds to make up difference, he said.

Last year, President Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, setting aside $1 billion for state and local governments for security, planning and other costs associated with the Games.

Some council members have voiced concerns that the federal government might not follow through on its commitment, or that only a fraction of those funds would make their way to L.A., one of several Southern California communities slated to host Olympic competitions.

In April, Rodriguez sent LA28 a letter warning the city’s public safety costs could easily blow past $1 billion if there is an emergency or major weather event.

City Controller Kenneth Mejia, in an interview, said he intends to use his office to look into LA28’s finances in the run-up to the Games. He also argued that the deal to secure the Olympics was a bad one from the beginning.

“We’re already locked into a huge financial liability. This was one of our big chances to throw in protections for the city and also provide that transparency,” said Mejia, who opposed the agreement.

If LA28 makes money on the Games, the organizing committee would be barred from distributing that surplus to any organization until it has covered its financial obligations to the city, according to the terms approved Wednesday by the council.

Szabo, appearing before the council, acknowledged that the city faces a financial risk. If LA28 does experience a financial loss, it first would tap its own $330-million contingency fund, he said.

After that, LA28 and the city would have access to a second, $270-million contingency fund set up to protect taxpayers, he said.

“Is that a likely scenario? We don’t believe so,” Szabo said. “Their reports thus far have suggested that they are meeting their targets on their sponsorships and on other revenues, and we want them to continue to hit their targets.”

Those arguments haven’t satisfied an array of activists, who urged the council to rewrite the agreement.

“LA28 has no incentive to keep the city from being forced into bankruptcy,” said Chris Tyler, spokesperson for Strategic Actions for a Just Economy, a nonprofit that advocates for low-income communities in L.A.

Under a deal reached in 2021, LA28 must reimburse the city for services that go beyond what would be provided on a normal day in key parts of the city, such as Exposition Park, the Sepulveda Basin and parts of downtown L.A.

The organizing committee is obligated to create a $270-million contingency fund that can be distributed as a surplus if the Games make money or cover any losses in the event of a shortfall.

The proposal approved Wednesday calls for the five-year-old agreement to be amended to ensure that those contingency funds can be used to cover the city’s costs in the event that other funds aren’t available.

The city and LA28 were supposed to have a draft agreement on the cost recovery process completed by October. A draft document did not surface until June.

City negotiators now head into another round of talks with LA28 on the precise level of services needed at the Convention Center, Venice Beach, Dodger Stadium and other locations. Those venue agreements must be completed in July 2027.

Under the terms approved Wednesday, the two sides must reach an accord on the cost of those additional services by October 2027.

News

Effort to ban genetically modified animals dies in California Legislature

urlhttps3A2F2Fcalifornia times brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com2Fb02F0d2F778359794f9984d66135443d

SACRAMENTO — Proposed legislation to protect animals from “Frankenstein”-like medical experimentation died in the state Senate on Thursday, and supporters blame election year politics for its demise.

Assembly Bill 1382 by Assemblymember Leticia Castillo (R-Home Gardens) would have banned the sale of genetically modified animals in California, such as glow-in-the-dark rabbits and horned “unicorn” horses.

While the business of cosmetically modified, futuristic-looking pets remains in its infancy, animal rights groups worry that eventually the creatures will be created, sold and later discarded in crowded municipal shelters.

Castillo’s bill passed unanimously in the Assembly earlier this year and sailed through the Senate Judiciary Committee in June with bipartisan support.

On Thursday, the legislation died in the Senate Appropriations Committee. The chair of that powerful committee is Sen. Sabrina Cervantes (D-Riverside) whose sister, Clarissa Cervantes, is challenging Castillo in the Nov. 3 election.

Cervantes never brought up the bill during Thursday’s hearing, which effectively kills it. Cervantes’ office didn’t respond to requests about why the legislation died.

Judie Mancuso, the founder of Social Compassion in Legislation, the bill’s sponsor, called the outcome “ludicrous.”

“When you’ve worked in the Capitol as long as I have, you understand that good bills can become political assets or political liabilities during an election cycle,” said Mancuso.

Castillo pledged Thursday to continue her focus on animals and cosmetic genetic engineering.

“This bill was never about politics — it was about protecting animals from being turned into novelty products,” Castillo said in a statement. “I’m disappointed AB 1382 did not move forward, but I am not done fighting for these animals. The technology that makes ‘designer pets’ possible isn’t going away, and neither am I.”

A 2025 Wired article entitled “Your Next Pet Could Be a Glowing Rabbit” profiled a Texas company seeking to create gene-edited pets. Josie Zayner, the founder of the company, told the Times in July that she opposed Castillo’s bill.

Castillo, at a hearing earlier this year, said she understands the concept of gene-editing animals for health reasons, but doesn’t want to see the alterations for cosmetic reasons.

Glow-in-the dark fish were exempt from her bill, which proposed civil penalties of at least $5,000.

Though the Judicial Council of California, the policy-making body for the courts, reviewed the legislation and didn’t have any fiscal concerns about it, the Senate Appropriations Committee analysis warned of “potentially significant workload cost pressures to the state funded trial court system” to resolve any civil cases related to the bill.

“The fiscal impact of this bill to the courts will depend on many unknowns, including the number of cases filed and the factors unique to each case,” the analysis stated.

The Democratic-controlled legislature uses appropriations committees to cull through hundreds of bills placed on what is referred to as the “suspense file.”

Officially, the suspense file is a tool for legislative leaders to evaluate costly bills by weighing them against one another and deciding what to advance to a vote by the Senate and Assembly. Unofficially, it’s used as a way for Democrats who control the Legislature to kill controversial bills out of the public eye.

California Democrats are making an aggressive push to unseat Castillo from the Assembly in the November election, Politico reported.

Castillo defeated Clarissa Cervantes in 2024 by nearly 600 votes to represent parts of Riverside County and San Bernardino County. Castillo lost to then-Assemblymember Sabrina Cervantes in 2022.

After the bill was moved to the Senate Appropriations Committee earlier this year, animal advocates reached out to state Senate Pro Tempore Monique Limón’s office to question the move.

“It’s my belief that there is some kind of political game going on,” Michelle Kelly, chief executive of the nonprofit welfare organization Los Angeles Rabbit Foundation, told the Times last month.

“Why would anyone not want to move forward with this bill?” Kelly said.

A representative for Limón declined to comment.

News

Kennedy Center Board Decides to Inscribe Trump’s Name on Building

The vote to add “Restored and Renovated by President Donald J. Trump” is an aggressive test of a judge’s order to remove his name.

News

Two Million X-Ray Sources, and One Cluster That Doesn’t Fit

Clusters are the largest gravitationally bound things in the universe, thousands of galaxies held together in a vast reservoir of hot gas, gas so hot it glows in X-rays rather than visible light. But they do not stop at a tidy, neat edge. They taper away into the surrounding darkness, and they are still being fed, drawing in fresh material along enormous threads of gas that run between them like the strands of a web. Those outskirts are the interesting part, because they are where the universe is still assembling itself. They are also very faint, which is why so little is known about them.

The eROSITA telescope, launched in 2019 aboard the joint Russian and German Spektrum-RG mission, has now published its second major data release. Built from three complete surveys of the sky, DR2 contains close to two million X-ray sources across the western half of the sky, about twice as many as the first release. Roughly 1.9 million are point like, mostly stars and feeding supermassive black holes. Some 64,000 are extended: galaxy clusters, nearby galaxies and the shredded remains of supernovae.

Galaxy cluster A3266 in X-rays, linked by a filament of hot gas to a neighbouring galaxy group. The Bonn team measured the faint outer glow for the first time and found gas hotter and denser than the models predict (Credit : Jakob Dietl/Uni Bonn/eROSITA-DE)

Within that haul, Thomas Reiprich and Jakob Dietl at Bonn’s Argelander Institute went after a single object. A3266 is a massive cluster connected by a filament of gas to a neighbouring group of galaxies, and their team became the first to measure the faint X-ray glow in its outer reaches.

Our current theories of how cosmic structure formed match what eROSITA sees, that’s reassuring. The interesting news is in the detail, where they don’t quite match. The gas in the outskirts and in the filament runs hotter and denser than predicted, and contains comparatively little in the way of heavy elements.

The Perseus cluster, one of the brightest X-ray objects in the sky. The diffuse glow is gas hot enough to shine in X-rays, and it holds more mass than all the cluster’s stars together (Credit : X-ray: NASA/CXC/SAO/V. Olivares et al.; Optical/IR: DSS; H-alpha: CFHT/SITELLE; Image Processing: NASA/CXC/SAO/N. Wolk)

Heavy elements, anything past hydrogen and helium, are manufactured inside stars and flung out when those stars die. Gas that is short of them has therefore never spent much time near a galaxy, which marks it as relatively pristine material arriving from the wider cosmic web rather than something expelled from the cluster itself. Yet it’s warmer and denser than models predict for gas of that kind. The two facts pull against each other, and reconciling them means adjusting our picture of how matter actually falls into a cluster: how quickly it heats, how thoroughly it mixes with what is already there and how much enriched gas the galaxies push back out to meet it.

Before eROSITA, the only X-ray survey of the whole sky came from ROSAT in 1990, so astronomers waited the best part of three decades for a successor. And eROSITA itself has been in safe mode since February 2022, with no return to science operations. There is a lesson in that about the value of surveying everything, whether or not you know yet what you are looking for.

Source : Homing In on the X-Ray Sky