Entertainment
Why Queen Camilla Didn’t Wear a Tiara to Her Royal Wedding
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/king-charles-queen-camilla-2005-wedding-070225-9410853200bb462fbedecfde8af87e28.jpg)
NEED TO KNOW
- When the future King Charles and Queen Camilla married in 2005, the bride opted to wear a less traditional royal wedding look, including no tiara
- Camilla actually did wear a tiara at her first wedding to Andrew Parker Bowles in 1973
- Since marrying into the royal family, Camilla has sported a number of sparkling headpieces
Queen Camilla became a member of the royal family on April 9, 2005, when she married the future King Charles. However, Camilla eschewed one major royal tradition on her big day: she didn’t wear a tiara.
While royal brides traditionally sport a sparkling tiara for their walks down the aisle, Camilla opted to sport a golden feathered headpiece by Philip Treacy.
The decision sparked commentary, but there were several reasons for the sartorial choice. For one, the wedding wasn’t the first for either member of the couple. Charles had previously been married to Princess Diana, and Camilla was married to British Army Officer Andrew Parker Bowles from 1973 to 1995.
The occasion also wasn’t a traditional royal wedding. The couple tied the knot in a civil ceremony followed by a religious blessing rather than a church ceremony.
In addition to the lack of tiara, Camilla opted to go with less traditional bridal looks for her big day. She wore two ensembles, both by British design pair Antonia Robinson and Anna Valentine: first a cream silk chiffon dress with a matching coat and hat for the civil ceremony at the Windsor Guildhall, followed by a pale blue chiffon gown with a floor-length, long-sleeved coat, topped with the feathered headpiece, for the Service of Prayer and Dedication at St. George’s Chapel.
Anwar Hussein/Getty
Camilla’s first tiara wear actually came decades before becoming a member of the royal family, when she donned a diamond-tiered circlet for her 1973 wedding to Parker Bowles.
The Cubitt-Shand tiara was loaned to Camilla by her grandmother, Sonia Keppel Cubitt, and has become a treasured family heirloom of the queen, per Tatler. The tiara, which features a large diamond floral spray in the middle of a diamond floral bandeau, was inherited by Camilla’s mother, Rosalind Shand, and when she died in 1994, it passed down to the future queen.
Camilla has continued to occasionally wear the Cubitt-Shand in the years since her second wedding, and her daughter, Laura Lopes, wore the tiara for her wedding day to Harry Lopes in 2006.
Frank Barratt/Keystone/Getty
Camilla’s first tiara moment as a member of the royal family came a few months after her wedding. For a Norwegian state dinner in November 2005, the then-Duchess of Cornwall wore the Delhi Durbar Tiara. According to The Court Jeweller, the tall, platinum and gold circlet piece was created for Queen Mary in 1911, to be worn at a ceremony celebrating her and King George V’s coronation as the new emperor and empress of India.
The royal couple traveled to Delhi for the celebration, known as a durbar, and, as the crown jewels are not allowed to leave Great Britain, a new tiara was created for the Queen to wear in India. Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother, later wore the tiara on the royal family’s tour of South Africa in 1947.
However, the state dinner in 2005 marked the one and only time Camilla has worn the Delhi Durber tiara to date. It’s possible that controversy surrounding its ties to the British colonization of India — which has affected the public perception of other royal jewels, like the Koh-i-Noor diamond — has dissuaded the royals from sporting the piece.
Anwar Hussein Collection/ROTA/WireImage
Can’t get enough of PEOPLE’s Royals coverage? Sign up for our free Royals newsletter to get the latest updates on Kate Middleton, Meghan Markle and more!
Since her marriage to King Charles, one of Camilla’s most worn headpieces has been the Greville tiara. The impressive signature piece is not officially part of the crown jewels, but it was inherited by Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother, to whom Dame Margaret Greville bequeathed her entire jewelry collection in 1942.
The Queen Mother was notoriously secretive about the collection, which also reportedly includes a diamond necklace that belonged to Marie Antoinette. As The Court Jeweller explains in their breakdown of the collection, for the sake of propriety, she didn’t wear any of the pieces in public until the end of World War II. Even then, she kept many of the impressive pieces to herself until closer to the time of her death in 2002.
However, she was very fond of the Greville tiara, and it became her signature piece for the remainder of her life. She even wore the unique, geometric circlet in multiple official royal portraits.
Upon her death, the Queen Mother passed her jewelry collection on to her only living daughter, Queen Elizabeth. However, the long-reigning monarch never wore the Greville tiara in public, likely due to its significant connection to her late mother.
She did, however, agree to loan it to Camilla beginning in 2006, and the current Queen has made it a signature piece of her own.
Queen Camilla has since worn the Greville tiara on at least eight occasions, to state banquets, royal galas and even to the official state opening of Parliament.
Eddie Mulholland – WPA Pool/Getty
Queen Camilla isn’t the only recent royal to form an attachment to a piece from the infamous Greville collection.
On her wedding day to Jack Brooksbank in October 2018, Princess Eugenie decided to forgo a traditional veil in favor of the Greville Emerald Kokoshnik Tiara, commonly referred to as the Boucheron Tiara, lent to her by Queen Elizabeth.
The tiara is made of brilliant and rose-cut diamonds pavé set in platinum, with a stunning central oval emerald and six more emeralds on either side. The Court Jeweller explained that the mere existence of the Boucheron came as a surprise to many, as it had never been worn in public by the Queen Mother or Queen Elizabeth herself.
Entertainment
‘Widow’s Bay’ Season 1 ended with a wild plot twist

Down by the bay…
Warning: Spoilers ahead! Do not proceed unless you’ve watched the “Widows Bay” Season 1 finale, “We Hope You Enjoyed Your Time!”
In the Season 1 finale of Apple’s buzzy horror/ comedy, “Widow’s Bay,” the frazzled mayor, Tom Loftis (Matthew Rhys) tried to kill Ruth (K Callan) – only to get thrown with a plot twist. She confessed that she was secretly his late wife’s mother, which meant that his son, Evan (Kingston Rumi Southwick) was her grandson.
This was a big deal because it meant that Evan was the island founder Richard Warren’s (Hamish Linklater) last living descendant.
As set up in the previous episode, the whole reason why Tom tried to axe Ruth was that killing the last of Richard Warren’s bloodline would break the curse on the island, and save everyone.
In the Season 1 finale, Tom went to Ruth’s house during a storm and tried to kill her twice – first by crushing pills and putting powder in her tea, then by nearly smothering her with a pillow when he thought she was napping on her couch.
Tom was conflicted, and kept muttering to Ruth, “you’re a good person, you don’t deserve this.”
A friendly Ruth seemed oblivious to his murder attempts. She was having a blast, giving him a tour of her house and yapping about her herb garden.
She eventually confessed to Tom that she once had an affair with a married man, had a baby, and let the man and his wife raise the child. Her secret kid was Tom’s late wife, she revealed. An astounded Tom confirmed with Ruth that nobody else knew this information.
Elsewhere in the episode, the town gathered in a shelter as a dangerous storm raged. Patricia (Kate O’Flynn) and Wyck (Stephen Root) were in charge. Things spiraled into chaos when everyone discovered that their stores of food were moldy. The crowd started panicking and fighting.
Meanwhile, Sheriff Bechir (Kevin Carroll) was appalled to learn that he and his pregnant wife were trapped on the island, because of the storm – and, her due date came early.
Bechir didn’t want his kid to be born into the curse on the island, so he showed up at Ruth’s house with a gun and shot her.
“I won’t damn my child. Patricia said you’d be ending it,” he said to Tom, referring to ending the curse by killing Ruth. Bechir added that he came to Ruth’s house because he knew that Tom “wouldn’t” do it.
Tom told Bechir that Ruth wasn’t the last living descendant, and Bechir held Tom at gunpoint, demanding to know who was. Before Tom could say anything, the storm then cleared up.
So, seemingly, everything was okay. Ruth was wounded and bleeding, but appeared to be still alive. The episode ended with Tom driving off in his car with Evan.
But, he noticed the sound of a bell – signifying that not enough people got fed to the island, and more people will need to be offered as tribute.
That’s where “Widows Bay” ended, going into Season 2.
The Season 1 finale was more serious than the rest of the season, but the shift in tone worked. Tom spent most of the episode agonizing over his choice to try to kill a sweet old lady.
Rhy’s performance was stellar as always, as Tom unravelled – if he doesn’t get nominated at the Emmys and Golden Globes, it will be a ridiculous snub.
There were still plenty of laughs, like when Ruth was going through her photo album, and pointing out which men had “made a pass at her.” She also told Tom that she loved one of her ex boyfriends, until, “He got bit by an animal, and became that animal.” The show remains delightfully weird.
The Apple horror comedy has been the word-of mouth hit of the summer.
“It’s become one of those shows everyone’s talking about, and we’re thrilled to see audiences continue to embrace it,” Matt Cherniss, head of programming, Apple TV, said in a statement announcing Season 2.
Horror king Guillermo del Toro himself also publicly praised the show, posting on X that it, “may very well be the best streaming series in a long time” and called it, “mesmerizing.”
“Season two is about how everything is great on the island and there’s nothing to worry about,” creator Katie Dippold joked in Apple’s statement announcing the renewal.
Season 2 doesn’t have a premiere date yet.
Entertainment
Casa Amor predictions, Kenzie’s secret makeout session, & Kayda, Zach’s Hideaway visit, VRT unpacks latest episodes

“Love Island: USA” is heating up as the islanders adjust to their new normal after the fan-voted recoupling shook up the Villa. Our “Virtual Real-Tea” co-hosts Danny Murphy and Evan Real are recapping episodes 9 – 12 with our “Love Island” correspondent Jordan Emanuel. Kenzie Annis is torn between Caleb McDaniel and Corbin Mims as she’s secretly making out with her old bedmate. Kayda Bosse and Zach Georgiou take things to the next level by being the first couple to visit the Hideaway, while KC Chandler calls out “grandma” Aniya Harvey for being prude. With Zach’s “weird” comments about exploring a new bombshell and KC’s interest in Sol Dean, fans are predicting on Kalshi which of these couples will actually make it to the finish line. Check out VRT’s “Love Island” recaps every Tuesday and Friday for all the hot takes!
Trade “Love Island” on Kalshi! #KalshiPartner
Entertainment
Amanda Seyfried claims she had to hire a bodyguard after Charlie Kirk criticism

Amanda Seyfried claims she was forced to hire a bodyguard after her controversial remarks about Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
Speaking to British GQ in an interview published Monday, the “Housemaid” actress related how her description of the conservative political activist as “hateful” following his shooting death at a university last fall sparked a major response from critics, causing her to eventually fear for her own safety.
Revisiting the controversy, she told the outlet, “A, I’m allowed to f–king voice my feelings, and B, do it in a way that’s not unkind necessarily.”
“But there’s just an outsized fear and hatred and impulse to bash and to tear down,” she added. “And I experienced a very small fraction of that.”
“I want my kids to be able to feel safe to voice their opinions as long as they’re not harmful,” Seyfried, 40, continued.
“So I’m like, ‘What do I do? What do I say?’ And then all of a sudden I find myself with a f–king bodyguard at the airport and I’m like, ‘This is crazy.’” she concluded.
Kirk died after he was shot while on stage at Utah Valley University during a stop on his American Comeback Tour. He was 31.
He and his wife, Erika Kirk, shared two children — a daughter who will be turning 4 in August and a 2-year-old son.
Like the Kirks, Seyfried shares two children with husband Thomas Sadoski — daughter Nina, 9, and son Thomas, 5.
After her initial comment about Kirk following his death, Seyfried defended her statement by writing on Instagram, “We’re forgetting the nuance of humanity.”
“I can get angry about misogyny and racist rhetoric and ALSO very much agree that Charlie Kirk’s murder was absolutely disturbing and deplorable in every way imaginable,” she continued. “No one should have to experience this level of violence.”
She concluded: “This country is grieving too many senseless and violent deaths and shootings. Can we agree on that at least?”
The Academy Award-nominated actress also refused to apologize for the social media comments in a December 2025 interview with Who What Wear.
“I mean, for f–ks sake, I commented on one thing. I said something that was based on actual reality and actual footage and actual quotes,” the “Mean Girls” actress told the outlet.
“What I said was pretty damn factual, and I’m free to have an opinion, of course,” she added.
-
News2 weeks ago
Iran War Live Updates: Israel Strikes Southern Lebanon After Pulling Back From Threat to Beirut
-
News2 weeks agoNew Cloud-Detecting Method Will Help Astronomers Characterize Exoplanets
-
Trending2 weeks agoSF Giants’ familiar script sees Casey Schmitt homer, loss to Arizona
-
Trending2 weeks agoStripping U.S. citizenship for some is harder than Trump vowed : NPR
-
News2 weeks agoBlue Origin Issues Official Statement on New Glenn Explosion
-
Entertainment2 weeks agoBlack Crowes singer Chris Robinson booed after mocking Florida fans’ ‘USA’ chant
-
Trending2 weeks agoBoston Pride 2026 promises joy, freedom, protest
-
News3 weeks agoLasers at the Lunar Poles Could Help Astronauts Navigate
