News

Wally Funk, Aviation Pioneer and Oldest Woman to Travel to Space, Dies at 87

Wally Funk, an aviation pioneer and the oldest woman ever to go to space, died this past week. She was 87. She passed away on Wednesday, June 8th, at her apartment in an assisted living facility in Grapevine, a suburb of Dallas and Fort Worth, Texas. According to her caregiver, City Councilwoman Duff O’Dell, Funk had experienced several falls recently and was suffering from an infection in her leg. Funk made headlines worldwide in 2021 when she flew aboard the inaugural crewed flight of Blue Origin’s New Shepard rocket.

For Funk, it was a chance to finally realize a lifelong dream. In the early 1960s, Funk was one of 13 female pilots who joined the Mercury 13 program, a privately funded effort to test whether the best female pilots in the U.S. could become astronauts. They underwent the same rigorous tests as the male candidates who became the famed “Mercury Seven,” but were ultimately denied the chance to become astronauts. The program, not sanctioned by NASA, was canceled due to “doubts” about whether women should participate.

Nevertheless, Funk continued to dedicate herself to flying and blazing a trail for women in aviation. O’Dell told the AP press that Funk was the “most eternally optimistic person” she had ever met. “She was told by many, many, many men, ‘No, you can’t do this. No, you can’t do that.’ And she never got mad about it. She just was more determined.”

Loading tweet…

— View on Twitter

A Woman of Firsts

Born Mary Wallace Funk on February 1st, 1939, Funk earned her pilot’s license at Stephens College in Missouri and later studied education at Oklahoma State University because it had an aviation team, known as the Flying Aggies. As she related in a 2019 interview: “As a Flying Aggie, I could do all the maneuvers as well as the boys, if not better.” During astronaut training, she also spent 10 hours and 35 minutes in a sensory-deprivation tank, beating the record set by famed astronaut John Glenn.

Unfortunately, neither Funk nor any of her colleagues in the Mercury 13 program would go to space. In addition to the agency questioning the wisdom of sending women alongside men to space, there were also complications caused by the rules NASA instituted in 1958 governing astronaut selection. Initially, NASA believed that the best candidates would be pilots, submarine crews, or members of expeditions to the Arctic or Antarctica. However, this presented them with a large pool of potential candidates that would require significant time and resources to process.

President Eisenhower intervened and decided that military test pilots would be the best candidates, which greatly simplified the selection process. Since women were not permitted to undergo combat training in the early 1960s, the Mercury 13 candidates no longer met the requirements. The situation was different in the Soviet Union, where women were trained to become cosmonauts during the Vostok program. The Soviets also sent the first female cosmonaut, Valentina Tereshkova, to space on June 16th, 1963, as part of the Vostok 6 mission.

Despite these obstacles, Funk never stopped flying and never let other people’s prejudices stop her from doing what she loved. After graduating from OSU, she became the first female civilian flight instructor at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, and later the first female inspector for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the first female air safety investigator for the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). She owned a flying school in Taos, New Mexico, and taught aviation privately, logging over 19,600 hours of flight time and teaching more than 3,000 people to fly private and commercial aircraft.

*Wally Funk next to a T-33 Shooting Star aircraft at Fort Sills, Oklahoma, where she became the first female flight instructor. Credit: Blue Origin*

Funk also had the honor of being the youngest woman to graduate the Mercury 13 program and was told she “had done better and completed the work faster than any of the guys,” as she related in a promotional video for her Blue Origin flight. She also made several subsequent attempts to become an astronaut during the Space Age, but was told she couldn’t because she didn’t have an engineering degree. When NASA began admitting women into the astronaut corps in 1978, Funk was 39. As she related in a 2021 interview with CNN:

I got a hold of NASA four times, and said, ‘I want to become an astronaut,’ but nobody would take me. I didn’t think I would ever get to go up. Nothing has ever gotten in my way. They say, ‘Wally, you’re a girl, you can’t do that.’ I said, ‘Guess what? [It] doesn’t matter what you are. You can still do it if you want to do it.’ And I like to do things that nobody’s ever done before.

Funk’s Historic Flight

In 2021, Funk finally got a chance to realize her dream of becoming an astronaut after Blue Origin CEO Jeff Bezos invited her to be an “honored guest” aboard the NS-16 mission. She was joined by Bezos himself, his brother Mark, and Oliver Daemen, an 18-year-old student who won an auction contest. At 82 years old (at the time), Funk was the oldest person to go to space (and Daemen was the youngest). While this record would be broken later by William Shatner and Ed Dwight (America’s first Black astronaut candidate), who were both 90, she remains the oldest woman to go to space.

On launch day, June 20th, 2021, Funk was the most animated and enthusiastic of the crew, running up to the catwalk extending to the crew capsule and ringing the bell with excitement. The flight lasted 10 minutes and 10 seconds, and the crew module reached a maximum altitude of 107 km (66.5 mi) above sea level. As she said during the post-flight news conference:

I’ve been waiting a long time to finally get it up there, and I’ve done a lot of astronaut training through the world – Russia, America – and I could always beat the guys on what they were doing because I was always stronger and I’ve always done everything on my own. I want to go again, fast. I loved every minute of it. I just wish it had been longer.

*The seven surviving women who participated in the Mercury 13 program, including Wally Funk (second from left), attending the launch of the Space Shuttle Discovery in 1995. Credit: NASA*

A Loving Tribute

“Wally Funk’s unwavering determination proves that dreams have no expiration date,” said O’Dell in a statement. “Her courage, resilience, and groundbreaking achievements continue to inspire young people – especially girls – to pursue careers in science, aviation, and space exploration. Grapevine is honored to call Wally Funk one of our own.”

“Wally Funk never stopped believing that one day she would reach space. Her passion for flight, perseverance, and love of exploration will continue to inspire generations of Americans. Godspeed, Wally,” posted NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman on X. The city of Grapevine shared a tribute on Facebook:

Wally was a beloved Grapevine resident whose extraordinary accomplishments and generous spirit left an enduring legacy. The City of Grapevine proudly recognizes Wally Funk, whose extraordinary career has inspired generations by breaking barriers in aviation and space exploration. Funk continues to serve as a global symbol of determination, perseverance, and excellence. Funk dedicated more than seven decades to aviation, becoming one of the world’s most accomplished female pilots and, ultimately, fulfilling her lifelong dream of traveling to space.

Blue Origin also paid tribute to Funk in a post on X, calling her “a pioneer in every sense of the word”:

She became the youngest of the Mercury 13, outperforming nearly every test put in front of her, and ultimately, the only one of the thirteen to have ever reached space. On NS-16, 60 years later, Wally made history as the oldest astronaut at the time and remains the oldest woman to ever fly to space. It was a moment six decades in the making. We were humbled to be part of her journey. Her story will continue to inspire generations of future explorers. Fly, Wally, fly.

Further Reading: AP News, The Gaurdian

News

New Simulations Show How Galactic Centers Grow Together

Portrait of the Great Barred Spiral 20260825 233846

Understanding the formation and evolution of galactic centers is a major challenge facing astrophysicists. For some time, astronomers have known that the supermassive black holes (SMBHs) at the centers of galaxies and the densely packed nuclear star clusters that surround them play a major role in star formation and other processes. Alas, scientists were still missing some of the pieces of this particular puzzle. By understanding the mechanics that govern galactic centers, scientists will be able to track how the Universe itself has evolved since the first galaxies emerged.

Using a state-of-the-art galaxy simulation, a team led by researchers from Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam (AIP) has gained new insights into these processes. Their results, described in a study published in Astronomy & Astrophysics, indicate that nuclear star clusters and stellar discs found in the inner core are not independent processes, as previously thought. These findings are bridging the gap between theory and observation, improving our understanding of how galaxies evolve.

The research was led by SungWon Kwak, a postdoctoral researcher from the AIP. He and his colleagues were joined by researchers from the Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur (OCA), the SNU Astronomy Research Center, the Università di Bologna, the Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, the Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research at MIT, the University of California, Riverside, Tsinghua University, and the Institut für Physik und Astronomie at the Universität Potsdam.

$The diffraction spike in the center of NGC 1365 is a telescope artifact caused by an enormous amount of light in a compact region. Credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, Janice Lee (STScI), Thomas Williams (Oxford), PHANGS Team$ The diffraction spike in the center of NGC 1365 is a telescope artifact caused by an enormous amount of light in a compact region. Credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, Janice Lee (STScI), Thomas Williams (Oxford), PHANGS Team

The team hoped to learn more about the physical processes that led to the formation of two features that surround the SMBHs at the centers of most galaxies in the Universe: nuclear star clusters and nuclear stellar discs. Such features have been observed for only about a decade in the Milky Way and other galaxies, and were thought to be products of separate formation processes. However, observational surveys found no clear correlation between their masses and sizes, and simulations could not realistically reproduce the processes.

Resolving this mystery is the purpose of the Stellar Feedback in Galaxies and its Effects, or SMUGGLE-Ring, project, an advanced physics framework used in astrophysical simulations to model how stars and stellar feedback shape galaxies. Through their high-resolution hydrodynamical simulation, the team demonstrated that a barred galaxy (like the Milky Way) could naturally form both nuclear star clusters and nuclear stellar discs together, while simulating their growth over billions of years.

For the first time, the simulation directly reveals an evolutionary link between their formation, showing that they grow together. The simulation also shows that the galaxy’s stellar bar plays a central role in this process, funneling gas inward toward the center. As gas accumulates in the center of a galaxy, where the supernovae of dying stars generate shock waves that repeatedly trigger the formation of new stars. Over several billion years, hundreds of millions of solar masses’ worth of stars form in the galactic center.

“Our simulation achieves this by showing how the galactic bar acts like a cosmic conveyor belt, channeling gas inward to feed both structures simultaneously from the exact same reservoir,” explains SungWon Kwak. The results also explain why previous observations failed to find a clear connection between nuclear star clusters and nuclear stellar disks. “The apparent disconnection does not mean that the stars themselves differ fundamentally in age, chemical composition, or motion,” added Dr. Cristina Chiappini, also a scientist from AIP and co-author of the study.

In addition, the simulation showed that the structural relationship between the two processes naturally evolves. During periods of sustained growth, the relative masses and sizes of the cluster and disk begin to differentiate. Despite the shared underlying growth mechanism, the clusters and stellar disks appeared remarkably different when observed at different stages in their evolution. However, the results proved that the dynamics of this co-evolution are even more complex than all that.

Barred spiral galaxy known as NGC 1300 viewed nearly face-on. It’s thought the Milky Way is a barred spiral like this (Credit: NASA, ESA, and The Hubble Heritage)

At one point in their simulations, a star cluster of 30 million solar masses spiraled into the galactic center and merged with the nuclear star cluster. This was particularly fascinating, since recent observations of NGC 1365 revealed a massive star cluster inside the galaxy’s bar. This cluster is expected to spiral into the galaxy’s center and merge with its nuclear star cluster, causing it to grow in size and mass. This could also affect the mass of the SMBH inside the nuclear star cluster over time.

A key advantage of these types of astronomical simulations is how it allows researchers to observe processes that cannot be seen directly. In addition, simulations allow scientists to monitor the evolution of galaxies over billions of years. From this, they can observe the formation of a galaxy’s stellar bar, trace the inward flow of gas, witness the birth of new stars, and see how the nuclear stellar disk gradually grows outward from the center.

Another interesting part of the team’s simulation was the way they included dark matter, which played a crucial role in the results. As co-author Dr. Ivan Minchev said:

Previous studies rely on fixed background potentials for the galactic bar and dark matter halo, but the realistic dynamical treatment between stars and the dark matter halo using live particles in our model allows us to form a realistic bar that evolves in time and then naturally forms nuclear structures. Furthermore, our model also exhibits a ‘dark gap’ around the bar region, which is found in many observations and is known as evidence of the interaction between stars and dark matter by the rotation of the stellar bar.

These findings could expand our understanding of the connection between galactic components, helping astronomers interpret future observations.

Further Reading: AIP, Astronomy & Astrophysics

News

Officer who recorded colleagues’ racism says LAPD ‘ruined my life’

urlhttps3A2F2Fcalifornia times brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com2F972F9b2Fe838ea184be5866a4c12c9ca

Daniel Flores, the LAPD officer who set off a political firestorm when he reported some of his police colleagues for making racist, sexist and homophobic comments behind closed doors, broke his silence on Tuesday.

Flores, whose only public comments had for months been filtered through his legal team, agreed to speak with The Times, detailing the toll that the prior year and a half had taken on him.

“It’s definitely been a roller coaster of a struggle,” he said. “As you know, I didn’t see this coming or turning out like this.”

Last month, L.A. County Dist. Atty. Nathan Hochman charged Flores with 16 felonies, alleging he violated a state eavesdropping law by secretly recording his fellow LAPD officers. The charges could have carried a sentence of 13 years in prison, but last week, after facing criticism from Mayor Karen Bass and others, Hochman downgraded the counts to misdemeanors with a diversion agreement that will probably allow Flores to avoid any time behind bars.

Internal LAPD documents reviewed by The Times raise new questions about the timing of Flores’ prosecution.

The files show that the department originally presented the case to prosecutors on July 1, 2025. Ten days later, the district attorney’s office declined to bring charges.

The case sat dormant for about a year, before Flores filed a whistleblower lawsuit against the city in L.A. County Superior Court, alleging he faced retaliation for speaking out about misconduct. Less than three weeks later, the district attorney’s office announced that it would move forward with the prosecution.

Flores and his attorney allege the case was further retaliation for his decision to file a lawsuit.

On Tuesday, the district attorney’s office said that it didn’t pursue charges against Flores in July 2025 because it lacked the evidence to “definitely establish” that he had made the recordings and sent the case back to the LAPD for further investigation.

“That changed when Flores filed his own civil lawsuit against the City of Los Angeles,” the office said in a statement. A spokesperson said that even though Flores had admitted to making the recordings, the LAPD didn’t release that information to the district attorney until after Flores filed his lawsuit.

Hochman said last week that he wanted to thread the needle between punishing the illegal recording and not dissuading whistleblowers from coming forward.

“If you go ahead and illegally eavesdrop in our community, you will face criminal prosecution for doing it, so don’t take out your cellphones and or your smart glasses or anything else,” he said, while encouraging whistleblowers to work with the district attorney’s office to gather evidence in the future.

Flores told The Times that he initially filed an anonymous Internal Affairs complaint against members of his LAPD unit in February 2025. Flores worked in a recruitment division, which handles job applications from aspiring officers.

According to Flores’ complaint, he heard officers make jokes and racial comments about Black candidates who interviewed for the department, focusing on their “failures and adverse histories, which prevented them from being hired as Los Angeles Police Officers.”

LAPD Officer Daniel Flores and his attorney Alan Jackson

A few days after filing the complaint, he said, he received a call from Internal Affairs investigators who notified him that someone had accused him of making racist remarks. Flores vehemently disputes this, saying that it was clearly an attempt to discredit him. When he reached out to the police union for legal representation, he said, he was told that there was a conflict of interest because one of the union’s attorneys was already representing some of the accused officers.

Ten days after filing his anonymous complaint, he submitted a letter to the inspector general’s office, along with a USB drive with the 122 recordings, which he’d made over a span of about six months.

According to Flores, he began surreptitiously recording his colleagues after their inappropriate commentary got so bad that one day a police lieutenant warned them that if they continued, they would “bring down the whole department.”

Flores said he taped his fellow officers making racial slurs, along with homophobic and sexist comments. In one conversation about Latino immigrants, a colleague was heard saying, “F—ing deport them, call ICE.”

Flores’ attorney Greg Smith said that his client tried to report misconduct by going through the proper channels but still ended up being targeted by the department and, later, prosecutors.

“He was trying to fix things, not trying to create publicity or any kind of public outrage,” Smith said.

Almost from the outset, it appeared as though the outcome of the department’s investigation into the allegations was “predetermined,” according to Flores. Investigators assigned to the case were asking some of the accused officers leading questions, which seemed designed to soften their actions, he said.

“I know from the beginning that they were going to try to swing the investigation, and I knew from the beginning that they were going to try to come after me,” Flores said.

California is a “two-party consent” state, meaning it is a crime for someone to record a conversation without the permission of other participants, unless there is a court order granting authority to do so. Flores’ attorneys have argued that his actions were allowed under the California Invasion of Privacy Act because he was acting in the course of his duties as a police officer.

Flores has kept his job with the LAPD since filing the initial complaint and facing criminal charges, but remained away from the department on medical leave.

He described the months since the complaint became public as “painful” and isolating.

“No cop will talk to me at all,” he said. No one from the department has reached out to check on him since the scandal broke; he suspects it’s because people are worried about getting entangled in his criminal or civil cases.

“The things I see on the internet: The other cops are calling me rat, snitch, [saying], ‘Snitches get stitches,’” he said. He recalled one Facebook post, made by a current LAPD officer, that drew scores of comments from officers criticizing him.

“It’s hurtful, because the people who are calling me rat and snitch, they’re all officers,” he said. “The people on my side, they’re all citizens.”

He was reluctant to report the wrongdoing, he said, because one of the lieutenants had boasted that he knew a lot of people in Internal Affairs.

He said that during his time with the department, he had heard of other reports of wrongdoing that ended up going nowhere. The conversations he recorded were “apparently normal for the LAPD,” he said.

“When I brought it to their attention, I think the reason they retaliated against me as much as they did was because there was evidence, so it was no longer to be under the table,” he said.

Asked whether he regretted coming forward at all, Flores paused before saying that he did.

“I do because it ruined everything, it ruined my life,” he said. “My face is all over the internet. They painted me as the criminal. They didn’t even care about the bigotry, they just painted me as the criminal.”

News

How the Supreme Court Is Issuing Orders as Trump ‘Emergencies’ Return

The justices are still struggling with whether and when to explain themselves to the public when the court issues temporary, but consequential, orders.