News
9th Circuit blocks law to prevent ‘forced outing’ of trans students
California’s effort to shield the decisions of transgender students in public schools from the eyes of prying parents remains on hold this week after the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found a state law designed to protect them was likely unconstitutional.
The U.S. Supreme Court previously upheld a temporary block on the law after it was challenged, sending the case back to the appellate court. The 9th Circuit’s ruling Thursday kept the block in place, saying the state cannot enforce the measure while the court battle over its legality continues.
Passed in 2024, the California law known as Assembly Bill 1955 was intended to prevent school employees from notifying parents about a student’s gender expression without their consent. Boosters of the law say it protects vulnerable students from “forced outing” to families who may be hostile to their trans and nonbinary children. Opponents say it compels schools to “mislead” parents about their children and leaves them “shut out” of critical decisions.
The 9th Circuit had previously allowed the law to stand while the state fought an injunction from a district court in Santa Ana.
Legal experts said the appellate court’s latest decision appeared to expand “parental rights” — a move with potentially significant implications for all U.S. families, including the roughly 72.5 million American children who are not transgender.
Mary Ziegler, a professor at the UC Davis School of Law and an expert on American parental rights laws, said the ruling was “arguably significantly more extensive than the Supreme Court has spelled out.”
“Trans issues are hot-button issues … but this kind of parental rights litigation has much broader ambitions, some of which have nothing to do with LGBTQ people,” she said. “There’s an ambition to transform parental rights period, and the easiest way to do that is to focus on trans issues.”
Quoting extensively from the related March Supreme Court decision, the 9th Circuit panel found that parents “have an affirmative constitutional right” to be told if their children swap names or pronouns, change how they dress or otherwise alter their gender expression at school.
The panel of appellate judges said they heard no arguments that the California families who brought the challenge “are ‘unfit parents’ who present a risk of abuse if they are provided with information about their children exhibiting symptoms of gender dysphoria.”
Conservatives, including Justice Amy Coney Barrett, have criticized the California law for meddling in the affairs of families.
“Under California’s policy, parents will be excluded — perhaps for years — from participating in consequential decisions about their child’s mental health and wellbeing,” Barrett wrote in a concurrence to the Supreme Court’s decision in March. “Thus, the parents are likely to suffer irreparable harm if California enforces its policy while this litigation winds its way through the courts.”
The court’s liberal justices disagreed, finding the decision premature.
“I have no doubt that parents have rights, even though unenumerated, concerning their children and the life choices they make,” Justice Elena Kagen wrote in her dissent. “California’s policy, in depriving all parents of information critical to their children’s health and well-being, could have crossed the constitutional line.”
There are multiple similar suits currently en route to the high court, each challenging local or state policies that prevent schools from disclosing certain information about children’s gender identity and expression to their parents. Many, including the two related California cases, are championed by conservative legal activists expressly in the name of parents’ rights.
Thursday’s 9th Circuit ruling was a “major victory,” said America First Legal, an advocacy organization co-founded by senior White House aide Stephen Miller, which helped argue the case.
The Supreme Court’s decision emerged from a suit brought on behalf of two California teachers by the Thomas More Society, a conservative public interest firm named for the 16th century Catholic saint.
Ziegler and other experts warned a future decision could echo through the legal landscape, transforming how courts approach issues as disparate as school vaccine mandates and whether parental discipline warrants the intervention of state child protective services.
“Reasonable people can disagree about what involvement parents should or shouldn’t have in this context,” Ziegler said of the California trans rights law. “But that’s not what this is about. It’s about this complete overhaul of the power parents have. And children are vanishing from the story.”
News
Two Million X-Ray Sources, and One Cluster That Doesn’t Fit
Clusters are the largest gravitationally bound things in the universe, thousands of galaxies held together in a vast reservoir of hot gas, gas so hot it glows in X-rays rather than visible light. But they do not stop at a tidy, neat edge. They taper away into the surrounding darkness, and they are still being fed, drawing in fresh material along enormous threads of gas that run between them like the strands of a web. Those outskirts are the interesting part, because they are where the universe is still assembling itself. They are also very faint, which is why so little is known about them.
The eROSITA telescope, launched in 2019 aboard the joint Russian and German Spektrum-RG mission, has now published its second major data release. Built from three complete surveys of the sky, DR2 contains close to two million X-ray sources across the western half of the sky, about twice as many as the first release. Roughly 1.9 million are point like, mostly stars and feeding supermassive black holes. Some 64,000 are extended: galaxy clusters, nearby galaxies and the shredded remains of supernovae.

Galaxy cluster A3266 in X-rays, linked by a filament of hot gas to a neighbouring galaxy group. The Bonn team measured the faint outer glow for the first time and found gas hotter and denser than the models predict (Credit : Jakob Dietl/Uni Bonn/eROSITA-DE)
Within that haul, Thomas Reiprich and Jakob Dietl at Bonn’s Argelander Institute went after a single object. A3266 is a massive cluster connected by a filament of gas to a neighbouring group of galaxies, and their team became the first to measure the faint X-ray glow in its outer reaches.
Our current theories of how cosmic structure formed match what eROSITA sees, that’s reassuring. The interesting news is in the detail, where they don’t quite match. The gas in the outskirts and in the filament runs hotter and denser than predicted, and contains comparatively little in the way of heavy elements.

The Perseus cluster, one of the brightest X-ray objects in the sky. The diffuse glow is gas hot enough to shine in X-rays, and it holds more mass than all the cluster’s stars together (Credit : X-ray: NASA/CXC/SAO/V. Olivares et al.; Optical/IR: DSS; H-alpha: CFHT/SITELLE; Image Processing: NASA/CXC/SAO/N. Wolk)
Heavy elements, anything past hydrogen and helium, are manufactured inside stars and flung out when those stars die. Gas that is short of them has therefore never spent much time near a galaxy, which marks it as relatively pristine material arriving from the wider cosmic web rather than something expelled from the cluster itself. Yet it’s warmer and denser than models predict for gas of that kind. The two facts pull against each other, and reconciling them means adjusting our picture of how matter actually falls into a cluster: how quickly it heats, how thoroughly it mixes with what is already there and how much enriched gas the galaxies push back out to meet it.
Before eROSITA, the only X-ray survey of the whole sky came from ROSAT in 1990, so astronomers waited the best part of three decades for a successor. And eROSITA itself has been in safe mode since February 2022, with no return to science operations. There is a lesson in that about the value of surveying everything, whether or not you know yet what you are looking for.
Source : Homing In on the X-Ray Sky
News
L.A. reaches deal on cost recovery for 2028 Olympics, amid warnings

A divided Los Angeles City Council finalized a deal with organizers of the 2028 Summer Olympic Games aimed at controlling the city’s costs during the global event, amid complaints that the protections don’t go far enough.
On a 10-4 vote, the council approved the Enhanced City Resources Master Agreement, which lays out the process for the city to seek reimbursement for the services it provides during the Games.
City Administrative Officer Matt Szabo said the agreement sets up additional financial safeguards, by allowing the city to tap a $270-million contingency fund set up by LA28, the privately run Olympic organizing committee, if outstanding costs remain.
Still, some on the council warned that taxpayers could wind up on the hook for $1 billion in police and other public safety costs if LA28 incurs serious losses.
“This fails to provide any safeguards for Los Angeles taxpayers and most assuredly risks the city’s fiscal stability,” Councilmember Monica Rodriguez said after voting against the agreement. Councilmembers Eunisses Hernandez, Ysabel Jurado and Nithya Raman, who is running against Mayor Karen Bass, also were opposed.
Critics of the Games have long voiced concern about the risks that surround the event.
If LA28 incurs massive financial losses, the city would cover the first $270 million. The state would absorb the next $270 million. After that, the city’s general fund, which pays for basic services, would cover any remaining shortfall.
The city’s negotiating team said L.A.’s political leaders committed the city roughly a decade ago to serve as a financial backstop for the Games, as part of the contract that made L.A. the host city.
“We are providing you today as many protections as we can, given the reality that if it is not financially successful, it does fall onto us,” Szabo said. “So there is nothing we could propose today or tomorrow or next year that would eliminate that risk.”
The council, in a flurry of votes, sidelined proposals from Councilmembers Imelda Padilla, Hernandez and Raman that were billed as a way to reduce the risk facing the city.
LA28 spokesperson Jacie Prieto Lopez, in a statement, said the newly approved agreement delivers on the committee’s commitment to “execute a safe, secure and fiscally responsible Games that benefit Los Angeles for decades to come.”
Under the terms approved by the council, LA28 would pay the city ahead of the Games for services that are ineligible for reimbursement from the federal government, such as street sweeping and deployment of traffic officers.
The terms around police protection are more complicated.
The city would first seek reimbursement from the federal government for law enforcement services, particularly in high-security zones, Szabo said. If the government fails to cover the cost of security in those areas, the city would seek all or a portion of LA28’s contingency funds to make up difference, he said.
Last year, President Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, setting aside $1 billion for state and local governments for security, planning and other costs associated with the Games.
Some council members have voiced concerns that the federal government might not follow through on its commitment, or that only a fraction of those funds would make their way to L.A., one of several Southern California communities slated to host Olympic competitions.
In April, Rodriguez sent LA28 a letter warning the city’s public safety costs could easily blow past $1 billion if there is an emergency or major weather event.
City Controller Kenneth Mejia, in an interview, said he intends to use his office to look into LA28’s finances in the run-up to the Games. He also argued that the deal to secure the Olympics was a bad one from the beginning.
“We’re already locked into a huge financial liability. This was one of our big chances to throw in protections for the city and also provide that transparency,” said Mejia, who opposed the agreement.
If LA28 makes money on the Games, the organizing committee would be barred from distributing that surplus to any organization until it has covered its financial obligations to the city, according to the terms approved Wednesday by the council.
Szabo, appearing before the council, acknowledged that the city faces a financial risk. If LA28 does experience a financial loss, it first would tap its own $330-million contingency fund, he said.
After that, LA28 and the city would have access to a second, $270-million contingency fund set up to protect taxpayers, he said.
“Is that a likely scenario? We don’t believe so,” Szabo said. “Their reports thus far have suggested that they are meeting their targets on their sponsorships and on other revenues, and we want them to continue to hit their targets.”
Those arguments haven’t satisfied an array of activists, who urged the council to rewrite the agreement.
“LA28 has no incentive to keep the city from being forced into bankruptcy,” said Chris Tyler, spokesperson for Strategic Actions for a Just Economy, a nonprofit that advocates for low-income communities in L.A.
Under a deal reached in 2021, LA28 must reimburse the city for services that go beyond what would be provided on a normal day in key parts of the city, such as Exposition Park, the Sepulveda Basin and parts of downtown L.A.
The organizing committee is obligated to create a $270-million contingency fund that can be distributed as a surplus if the Games make money or cover any losses in the event of a shortfall.
The proposal approved Wednesday calls for the five-year-old agreement to be amended to ensure that those contingency funds can be used to cover the city’s costs in the event that other funds aren’t available.
The city and LA28 were supposed to have a draft agreement on the cost recovery process completed by October. A draft document did not surface until June.
City negotiators now head into another round of talks with LA28 on the precise level of services needed at the Convention Center, Venice Beach, Dodger Stadium and other locations. Those venue agreements must be completed in July 2027.
Under the terms approved Wednesday, the two sides must reach an accord on the cost of those additional services by October 2027.
News
Trump Wants the M.M.R. Vaccine Split Into Three Separate Shots. Doctors Say It’s a Bad Idea.
President Trump is calling for immunizations for measles, mumps and rubella to be given in individual jabs in three different appointments instead of the standard combination shot.
-
Trending2 weeks agoOverland couple killed in Guatemala after being deported by ICE
-
News3 weeks agoLucky 13! Starship Deploys Starlink Satellites and Splashes Down Intact
-
Entertainment3 weeks agoJohn Cusack reveals why he stepped away from Hollywood after decades of films
-
News3 weeks agoThis Long Beach spot is where food trucks are born
-
Entertainment3 weeks agoEric Dane called ‘Euphoria’ his most ‘profound’ work amid ALS battle
-
Trending3 weeks agoFormer IMMAF Champions Abdul Hussein and Magomed Tuchalov set for UFC debuts in Abu Dhabi
-
Trending3 weeks agoA qué hora y dónde ver el partido Atlante vs. América de la Liga MX Apertura 2026 | TUDN Liga MX
-
Entertainment3 weeks agoBret Michaels undergoes emergency surgery after performing 3 concerts in ‘intense’ pain
