News
California says Trump cannot roll back key climate rule in new lawsuit

California is suing the Trump administration over its decision to roll back the endangerment finding, the U.S. government’s longstanding scientific conclusion that planet-heating pollution seriously threatens Americans, state officials announced Thursday.
Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta, Gov. Gavin Newsom and the California Air Resources Board are co-leading a coalition of 25 attorneys general, the governor of Pennsylvania, and 10 cities and counties in a petition challenging the Environmental Protection Agency, filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
The 2009 endangerment finding was a long-awaited, foundational piece of the nation’s effort to address climate change, and it underpinned much of U.S. climate policy — including the EPA’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin touted the February repeal as “the single largest act of deregulation in the history of the United States of America.”
The coalition has argued that rescinding the endangerment finding is a violation of settled law, including clear Supreme Court precedent, as well as broad scientific consensus over the effects of greenhouse gas emissions on human health and welfare. Its rollback will disrupt the regulatory landscape and result in significant increases in greenhouse gas emissions, which drive climate change, they said.
The lawsuit will ask the court to vacate the EPA’s repeal and restore greenhouse gas emission standards for vehicles. A formal complaint is pending the judge’s acceptance of the petition.
“With the unlawful rescission of the Endangerment Finding, President Trump and his EPA have abandoned their most important mission: protecting the health and welfare of the American people,” Bonta said in a statement. “The science doesn’t lie: Climate change and [greenhouse gas] emissions are harming public health and causing devastating and ever-worsening disasters. Our communities have felt the impact of destructive wildfires, watched families run from burning homes, inhaling toxic fumes, and we’ve seen entire communities wash away in severe floods. The President can’t keep his head in the sand — climate change is real and decades of settled science warned us this was coming.”
Much of the EPA’s argument for repealing the endangerment finding hinged on whether greenhouse gases qualify as “air pollutants” under the Clean Air Act, making them subject to federal regulations. A landmark 2007 Supreme Court case, Massachusetts vs. EPA, determined that they are.
In its decision, the agency said it “carefully considered and reevaluated the legal foundation” for the finding and concluded that the Clean Air Act does not provide statutory authority for the agency to prescribe motor vehicle and emissions standards, and therefore has no legal basis for the endangerment finding or its resulting regulations.
In a statement Thursday, EPA officials reaffirmed that conclusion and said the lawsuit is not about the legality or the merits of their argument, but rather political motivation.
“EPA is bound by the laws established by Congress, including under the [Clean Air Act],” the agency said. “Congress never intended to give EPA authority to impose [greenhouse gas] regulations for cars and trucks.”
The coalition alleges that the repeal of the endangerment finding violates the Clean Air Act as well as the Administrative Procedure Act by resting on the “flawed assertion” that it lacks legal authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, and “ignores overwhelming and longstanding scientific evidence” about the role of greenhouse gas emissions on human health and welfare.
It also argues that the elimination of existing and future greenhouse gas emission standards for vehicles violates EPA’s legal obligations and fundamental responsibility to protect the public from environmental harm.
EPA’s repeal will not only disrupt 15 years of regulatory progress, but will also threaten American investment in future technologies and U.S. leadership in the transportation sector and efforts to address climate change, the coalition said.
“This is what corruption looks like. Donald Trump is breaking the laws that protect Americans from climate pollution — all to enrich his Big Oil and his wealthy polluting allies,” Newsom said in a statement. “Workers, families, and communities would pay the price, left choking on dirty air. No one is above the law in this country. Not even the president.”
The EPA also cast doubt on the climate science behind the endangerment finding, despite the fact that independent researchers around the world have long concluded that greenhouse gases released by the burning of gasoline, diesel and other fossil fuels are warming the planet and contributing to worsening climate impacts. Understanding of how carbon dioxide warms the atmosphere goes back more than a century.
Among its justifications, the agency’s ruling says that reducing greenhouse gas emissions from new and existing vehicles in the U.S. would have only “de minimis impacts” on global temperature and sea level rise. But many experts say reducing those emissions is critical for curbing climate change, as the transportation sector is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. In California, it accounts for about half of the state’s emissions.
EPA’s proposal to repeal the endangerment finding received more than half a million public comments, including from environmentalists, scientists, civil rights groups, public health organizations and former EPA officials opposed to the plan. Support for the plan generally came from industry and regulatory reform groups who said the vehicle standards that rest on the endangerment finding are costly and unduly burdensome.
Bonta co-leads the lawsuit alongside the attorneys general of Massachusetts, New York and Connecticut. They are joined by attorneys general of Arizona, Colorado, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin and the District of Columbia.
The coalition also includes Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro; the cities of Boston, Chicago, Cleveland, Columbus, Denver, Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco, Santa Clara and Harris County, Texas.
This marks California’s 63rd lawsuit against the Trump administration since the president returned to office last year.
News
ICE shootings protested in Pasadena on National Day of Action
Approximately 50 demonstrators gathered Saturday morning in Pasadena as part of a national action to honor lives lost during immigration enforcement operations and in detention centers during the Trump administration.
They wore fliers around their necks, hung with yellow thread, bearing the smiling faces and names of some of the 75 people who have died since January 2025.
“Killed by ICE” was printed above a photo of each person, including local resident Roberto Carlos Montoya Valdez, a 52-year-old killed while trying to flee immigration agents who descended on a Home Depot in Monrovia last year.
The Los Angeles residents, part of the San Gabriel Foothills Indivisible group, carried American flags and held signs that read “No ICE No War” and “Stop ICE Murders.”
“Good morning, Pasadena,” Betsy Hanger, an organizer with the group, boomed into a megaphone as she walked through an intersection. “Honk for democracy. Honk if you want ICE off our streets now.”
A chorus of horns sounded as drivers signaled their support.
Organizer Andra Clarke held a banner in each hand that read “Neighbors Say ICE Out.” The sign around her neck carried the name and photo of Francisco Gaspar-Andrés, a 48-year-old who died in a Texas detention center in December.
Heba Turner was among protesters demanding justice for those killed by ICE officers.
(Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times)
Clarke, 61, said the group has been gathering at the intersection of Colorado Boulevard and Fair Oaks Avenue every Saturday since March. Last weekend, they celebrated civil rights activist John Lewis.
This Saturday, though, their focus was aimed at ICE.
“Now 75 people have died at the hands of ICE,” Clarke said. “We were originally told, ‘Oh they’re going to go after the criminals, the people who are the worst of the worst.’ That’s a lie; that is not what’s happening.
“They’re targeting communities, they’re targeting people of color. It’s fascism. … Anybody who cares about humanity should care about what’s happening.”
Clarke said it hit her hard when she learned of the two recent deaths at the hands of ICE.
The event was also a vigil honoring 52-year-old Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, who was killed by an ICE agent in Houston on July 7 while driving his construction crew to a job site, and Johan Sebastian Guerrero, 25, who was fatally shot by an ICE officer in Maine during a traffic stop earlier this month.
“It’s like, again? It just doesn’t end. It feels like it never ends — the evil.”
Shortly before noon, Clarke used a megaphone to read aloud the names of the dozens who have died. After each name read, Hanger struck a singing bowl, the vibrations sounding out in the corner where they stood. At times, she read “unidentified man” or “four unidentified women.”
Next to them was a poster board with a photo of Daphy Michel, a 31-year-old woman found unresponsive at a bus shelter in Pittsburgh after ICE released her “into cold winter conditions and no care for mental health episodes or notice to relatives.”
“Let’s take a moment of silence for all those who were taken,” Clarke said, bowing her head.
“It’s like, again? It just doesn’t end. It feels like it never ends — the evil,” said Andra Clarke, an organizer for San Gabriel Foothills Indivisible.
(Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times)
Among those gathered to listen was Leticia Lopez, a 65-year-old South Pasadena resident whose voice trembled as she talked about the impact of hearing about another arrest or death tied to enforcement operations.
“It gets me to the core,” she said, striking her chest. “It’s not getting any better, it’s getting worse. I just feel like I need to do something.”
Lopez, who wore a shirt that read “Immigrants are not criminals but the president is,” said her mother and grandmother were forcefully repatriated from Arizona to Mexico.
Her mother, who was raised in Mexico, later met her father there. He moved to the U.S. in the 1950s as a bracero. Hearing the stories of today, she said, “triggers everything that they went through.”
“When I see it happening, it’s a generational trauma that I feel,” she said. Lopez said people around her are carrying passports and documents in public to prove they’re citizens.
“Because they’re afraid they might be profiled, picked up, kidnapped by ICE. When my son goes out, I worry,” she said of her 28-year-old.
Later that afternoon, about four miles away outside of Home Depot in Pasadena, organizers staked in the ground dozens of white crosses that bore photos of the dead — the majority of them men. Attendees of the vigil laid flowers at the crosses in a makeshift cemetery.
“Shot dead by ICE,” read one with a photo of Keith Porter Jr., who was killed by an off duty ICE officer in California.
Several of them contained details of how the deaths unfolded. A man killed after a tractor trailer struck him as he fled an ICE raid in Florida. A Cuban immigrant who died in a detention center (his death was later ruled a homicide). A Mexican national who fell 30 feet to his death during a raid in California.
Among the photos on crosses were Renee Good and Alex Pretti.
“Are we going to wait until 70 more die to do something?” asked Marlom Portillo, an educator with the National Day Laborer Organizing Network, as he staked more crosses into the ground.
“What they want us to do is forget them,” Portillo added. “We will never get tired of denouncing this atrocity.”
“There are more people who died than there are people here protesting,” Kathleen Vallee, a Monrovia resident, observed to her friend. “And that says a lot about us.”
Vallee said when she attended the “No Kings” protest, it was “jam-packed.” Only a dozen people had gathered around 20 minutes into the vigil.
“It turns my stomach,” Vallee said, hands clasped. “This just seems to be seeping up from the sewer into our democracy and that motivates me.”
As the small crowd assembled, demonstrators carried signs that read “Every person is sacred,” “we keep us safe” and “neighbors say ICE out.” One woman carried a handmade sign that read: “Who will they come for next?”
Sheri Lochner, a 64-year-old Monrovia resident, is part of East Pasadena Community Defense Corner, a small group that “provides support and a sense of community” for day laborers.
Lochner said she watched as immigrant agents took six or seven men at an Oct. 1 ICE raid at the Monrovia Home Depot.
“So un-American,” Lochner said, as she scanned the rows of crosses. “This isn’t right.”
She added that her mom, who voted for Trump the first time, agreed with her.
“I speak up, I will not be silent,” she added.
News
Inside the Rushed Effort to Get Trump His New Air Force One
A New York Times investigation found that President Trump’s push to speed delivery of the aircraft led to ballooning costs and trade-offs in safety features.
News
Lucky 13! Starship Deploys Starlink Satellites and Splashes Down Intact
SpaceX’s Starship super-rocket deployed operational next-generation Starlink satellites for the first time during its 13th flight test, which addressed snags that arose in the previous test.
The 407-foot-tall, two-stage rocket rose from its Starbase launch pad in Texas at 5:51 p.m. CT today (10:51 p.m. UTC), with all 33 Raptor engines firing on the Super Heavy booster. On the way up, the rocket set a record for maximum dynamic pressure, also known as Max-Q.
Minutes after liftoff, the Starship upper stage — known as Ship — separated to continue on the flight test’s trajectory, and then the booster relit its engines for a controlled splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico. SpaceX launch commentator Dan Huot noted that not all of the engines fired up as planned — making for a splash that was a bit spicier than expected but still safe.
During the next phase of the test, Ship sent out 20 operational Starlink V3 satellites from a deployment system that’s been nicknamed the “Pez Dispenser.” For about 20 minutes, SpaceX’s engineering team ran a series of tests to check the deployment of solar arrays and see how the satellites were able to communicate with other spacecraft in the telecom network using laser systems.
“Not only were we able to make contact with all 20, but we also made comms over lasers with all of them as well,” SpaceX engineer Kate Tice said. “So, that is awesome.”
The satellites weren’t meant to stay in orbit. After the tests were completed, all 20 re-entered the atmosphere and burned up. But the data gathered during the tests will help SpaceX ensure that future batches of Starlink V3 satellites work properly.
Starlink V3 satellites are built to download data at speeds of up to 1 terabit per second, which marks a substantial technological advance over the V2 satellites that make up the bulk of the Starlink constellation. Adding V3 satellites to the network will upgrade Starlink’s capacity for direct-to-device services.
After satellite deployment, the upper stage executed a relight of one of its six Raptor engines in mid-flight, and then descended through the atmosphere to a splashdown in the Indian Ocean. On the way down, Ship’s heat shield weathered fiery flashes of plasma that made for quite a fireworks show on the in-space video transmitted down to Earth via Starlink. At the very end, the upper stage settled down intact in the water, spouting flames as it floated.
“That is a first. That is the softest splashdown we have ever had with a Starship there in the Indian Ocean,” Huot said. “This is a dream scenario for the team that’s trying to get this heatshield data.”
This marked the second test of SpaceX’s beefed-up Starship V3 rocket. The previous test in May followed a similar flight profile and was rated a success, but SpaceX made some modifications to systems on the Super Heavy booster as well as on the upper stage to address engine performance issues.
SpaceX’s initial attempt to launch the 13th flight test was aborted a week ago, at the moment of ignition, when four Raptor engines failed to start up for launch. After the scrub, SpaceX found six booster engines that raised concerns and replaced them for today’s second try.
-
Trending3 weeks agoEigelsbach mit starkem Sieg, Wobker disqualifiziert · tennisnet.com
-
Trending2 weeks agoUS marshal shot dead serving arrest warrant in Louisiana | US crime
-
Entertainment2 weeks agoZendaya wears angel wings at ‘The Odyssey’ NYC premiere
-
Entertainment2 weeks agoVrai makes the best lab-grown diamond earrings — just ask Taylor Swift
-
News2 weeks ago
Trump Pressures ICE to Resume Traffic Stops After They Were Halted Over Fatal Shootings
-
News2 weeks agoAfter a Billion Kilometres, China’s Asteroid Hunter Finally Arrives
-
Trending2 weeks agoMaps show millions of Americans under heat alerts from extreme temperatures in Plains, Northeast
-
Trending1 week agoGracie Abrams: Daughter From Hell Album Review
