News
No more Noem mess. But don’t pop the champagne yet
Her gleeful cruelty was matched only by the audacity of her incompetence.
Packaged in cosplay costumes — cowgirl, solider, even firefighter and pilot — we were supposed to see her as strong. But far from the mother of dragons she seems to envision herself as, she came across as the killer of Cricket (poor pup), a childish narcissist in a deadly serious job.
It was so over the top, you don’t even need a name. You know who I’m talking about. So there’s little wonder that when President Trump dumped Kristi Noem as the head of Homeland Security this week, much of America — even a bipartisan slice, I dare say — reacted much like the residents of Oz when the house landed on the wicked witch.
From late-night talk shows to the halls of power, there was more than a bit of celebration, and some actually reasonable schadenfreude. Normally, others misfortune isn’t something I pile on, but oh, did that woman earn some scorn.
But while I’m not one to discourage a moment of joy in these troubling days, Noem’s unceremonious firing and what comes next likely won’t provide the relief and reset many are hoping for — or are claiming this is. For all the chaos and pain that federal agents from various departments have caused under Noem’s leadership, there’s every reason to believe Trump has plans to continue and even expand his deportation efforts, and maybe even use these poorly trained, poorly vetted troops to impose his will on the next election.
What we are witnessing, rather any acknowledgment of policy gone awry, is spotlight envy from a petty president who doesn’t like to share attention, and a backroom concession that maybe optics do matter when you’re attempting to cram white nationalism onto a pluralist country.
It was, according to Fox News and other media, a claim under oath that Trump authorized Noem to spend more than $200 million on commercials promoting herself instead of him that got her canned. Pointing to just how deeply unpopular Noem made herself even within the Trump-verse, this death knell came courtesy of a set-up by a GOP senator, John Kennedy (R-La.), who walked Noem to her own demise with awe-inspiring political skill.
After forcing Noem to claim on the record multiple times that Trump knew about and approved the mega-spend on Noem’s ludicrously over-produced ads (while also raising questions about the contract and who benefited), Kennedy — almost certainly knowing Trump would see it — laid this dig on her with dripping Southern knife-in-the-back charm.
“To me, it puts the president in a terribly awkward spot,” Kennedy drawled, likely implanting grievance directly into the president’s brain. “I’m not saying you’re not telling the truth. It’s just hard for me to believe, knowing the president as I do, that you said, ‘Mr. President, here’s some ads I’ve cut, and I’m going to spend $220 million … running them,’ that he would have agreed to that.”
Soon after, Trump posted on social media that Noem was out. I bring this up because it wasn’t, after all, the substance of Noem’s actions that ultimately got her fired. In that same hearing on Capitol Hill, Democrats blasted Noem for the deaths of Alex Pretti and Renee Good in Minneapolis and her subsequent false portrayal of them as domestic terrorists; the conditions inside our ever-expanding network of detention centers that have led to deaths; and even her mile-high airplane bedroom where she may or may not be conducting an extramarital affair.
None of that seems to have bothered Trump. It was her self-promotion. And it was that same self-promotion, the constant demanding of attention, that likely also ultimately convinced those around Trump to dump her — because it was adding to the deep unpopularity of immigration roundups that have been dragging down Trump’s approval ratings and which therefore could hurt the midterm chances of down-ballot Trumpers.
Last month, a Quinnipiac poll found that 58% of voters wanted Noem removed, and almost 60% of voters disapproved of Trump’s immigration policies.
Noem was the public face of that disapproval, strutting forward with arrogance in the face of public censure, a veritable clown show of ineptitude. With her ouster, and the possible replacement by another Trump stalwart, Oklahoma first-term Sen. Markwayne Mullin, Trump removes the most visible and annoying sign of the unpopularity of his policies.
While pugnacious (he’s a former MMA fighter) and happy to create his own questionable headlines, Mullin is also far more low-key than Noem, and knows who the spotlight belongs to. He is almost certain to put a more palatable face on deportations and detentions (for some anyway) simply by not being so thirsty for press. A low bar, but there you have it.
But Mullin has made it clear that he backs the most extreme immigration policies Trump world can offer, and has little difference of opinion from Stephen Miller, the architect of this bleak moment, who seems to be running things slightly off screen.
The risk now is that Mullin can continue these policies, even expand them, with less scrutiny simply because he’s less offensive than Noem. Detention centers are being built at breakneck speed. In Arizona, ICE has begun charging legal immigrants with a Cold War-era law if they don’t carry their papers with them at all times. The Department of Justice is gutting the ability to appeal deportations, in an effort to hasten them without recourse. Nothing is changing — except the speed and force with which ICE is moving forward.
And Trump has doubled down on claims that illegal immigrants are responsible for massive voter fraud, laying the groundwork for some sort of intervention in the upcoming election. Election deniers have been installed in key positions — Mullin himself is one of them.
So far from a reset, Noem’s removal is a retrenching — an effort to remove our focus from the deeply troubling link between immigration policy and the threat to democracy while actually grinding forward on that dark path.
Because Noem was a train wreck we couldn’t help but watch, at a moment when the government would prefer we stop looking.
News
Erosion reveals decades-old infrastructure ‘relics’ in Newport Beach
A series of powerful hurricane-driven swells have surfaced forgotten remnants of Newport Beach’s infrastructure that lay buried beneath sand and water for many decades.
Videos and photos circulating on social media show piles of rocks, chunks of concrete and rusted metal rods after waves removed layers of sand along the shoreline.
Much of the erosion has occurred near the west jetty where the popular surfing spot the Wedge is located.
“We’re aware of the sand erosion and the different relics getting exposed down there,” said Newport Beach Lifeguard Battalion Chief Adam Yacenda.
Decades ago, he said, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers built a pair of jetties to stop beach erosion and protect oceanfront homes near the entrance of Newport Harbor.
“A lot of sand has been carved away, uncovering things that haven’t seen the light of day in decades,” Yacenda said. “There are PVC pipes, wires and a railway tie underneath the water and occasionally some metal.”
The storm swells come amid a growing El Niño, a climate pattern characterized by warming ocean waters in the central and eastern tropical Pacific, as well as increased rainfall. The 2015-16 El Niño pattern was blamed for record beach erosion along California’s coast.
At least three hurricanes have developed in the central and eastern Pacific since July, including Hurricanes Fausto and Genevieve, which generated life-threatening waves, strong rip currents and high surf warnings for Southern California.
A youngster on the beach is sprayed with sandy water June 9, 2026, amid high surf at the Wedge.
(Don Leach / Daily Pilot)
Earlier this month, Los Angeles County’s Department of Beaches and Harbors announced the closure of Point Dume State Beach after high tides and surf caused extreme erosion, leaving the bluff edge unstable, with drop-offs of up to 8 feet in some areas.
In Carlsbad, strong surf and high tides stripped away much of the sand and damaged a parking lot at Tamarack State Beach, which had received about 400,000 cubic yards of sand dredged from a nearby lagoon in early 2025, according to SFGate, which was first to report the issues in Newport Beach.
State park officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The erosion in Newport Beach comes after a busy summer for lifeguards, who in June had to take roughly 12,000 preventive actions, including moving people out of hazardous situations and carrying out more than 500 rescues.
The erosion of the beach now has sparked curiosity about what may be buried under the sand and safety concerns for local surfers at the Wedge.
Some residents believe the exposed material is part of an old groin that was built long before it expanded into a jetty.
Jetties are long barriers often constructed of boulders or concrete at inlets or harbors to keep navigation channels open, while groins are shorter and often are built on open beaches to stop erosion and widen the sand area.
A spokesperson for the city of Newport Beach did not immediately respond to questions about the material exposed on the beach.
News
How Ukraine’s Satellites Help Drive Its War Drones
Ukrainian drone teams have a powerful new tool: near real-time information on troop movements and locations.
News
What Can We Actually Find on an Exoplanet? Part 1: The Atmospheric Fingerprint
In 1990, the Voyager 1 spacecraft, then six billion kilometers from Earth and destined to become humanity’s most far-flung emissary, turned around and took a picture of home. The resulting image is now legendary: a haunting portrait of our tiny, fragile world, a single pale blue dot suspended in a sunbeam.
Now imagine you’re an alien species hunting for life on other worlds. You’ve found a promising candidate, a rocky planet orbiting a medium-sized star in its habitable zone. And let’s say that even with the most advanced technology at your disposal, all you have is that pale blue dot. Or worse: a single pixel, an image not even big enough to make out a sphere.
Everything you will ever know about us has to come out of that one pixel. Oceans, continents, weather, whatever life crawls or breathes or builds down here, all of it collapsed into one tiny smudge of light.
What could you figure out? It turns out an absurd amount, but only if you’re clever, patient, and willing to build the most ridiculous telescopes imaginable.
Let’s start with what we can do today, with the machines already at our fingertips. Well, they’re sitting a million or more kilometers from Earth, but they have dedicated channels for beaming data home, so that’s sort of like fingertips.
The main trick we use to figure out what’s on another planet, and especially to hunt for life there, is called transit spectroscopy. When a planet crosses in front of the face of its parent star, an event we call a transit, a sliver of starlight passes through the planet’s atmosphere on its way to us. And that atmosphere is full of stuff, mostly molecules, and different molecules absorb different wavelengths of light. Water absorbs certain wavelengths, methane others, bits of cheese still others. Every molecule has a unique fingerprint of colors it likes to swallow.
So all you have to do (and I’m airily waving away a mountain of technical difficulty here) is compare the star’s light with the planet in front of it to the star’s light without the planet in front of it. Whatever wavelengths went missing got absorbed by the atmosphere, and there is your fingerprint, written right into the light.
The reason there’s a mountain of technical difficulty, of course, is that the signal is fantastically tiny. For an Earth-sized planet around a Sun-like star, the atmosphere modifies the starlight by about one part in ten thousand. And that’s on a good day, with ideal conditions and a strong signal.
Which is exactly why we build monster telescopes like the James Webb. Launched in 2021, it carries a 6.5-meter mirror, big enough to tease out these kinds of minuscule differences. It’s an incredible machine, with one important caveat: it wasn’t built specifically to find life. It was built to do a hundred other jobs well too, from early galaxies to star formation to black holes to planetary atmospheres. Biosignatures, the signs of life, are just one item on a very long menu.
And that means it’s not going to hit a home run here. We’re hunting for four molecules in particular: oxygen, ozone, methane, and water, which together make up the classic biosignature cocktail. Why these four and not, say, literally anything else? Because on Earth, they are the atmospheric evidence for biology. Photosynthetic life exhales oxygen. Sunlight in the upper atmosphere converts some of that oxygen into ozone, which then blocks ultraviolet light, one of the reasons Earth is habitable in the first place. Microbial life, especially the anaerobic kind that hates oxygen, exhales methane: cow guts, swamps, termites, deep-ocean vents. And water isn’t a biosignature by itself, but it’s the solvent that every kind of life we know of requires.
These four are what life on our planet lives and breathes, and since Earth is the only example of life we have anywhere, it’s as good a starting point as we’re going to get.
Crucially, they need to show up as a package. A lot of oxygen on its own isn’t enough, because there are dull, purely chemical reactions, like sunlight breaking apart water vapor, that can produce it in abundance. Same with methane: belching volcanoes can make plenty. So what we’re really after is these gases in disequilibrium, an abundance of them coexisting when they have no business coexisting, unless something keeps topping them off. Oxygen and methane in the same atmosphere at the same time would normally react and cancel each other out within a few thousand years. See them together, and something is replenishing the supply.
On Earth, that something is life. One of the defining features of living systems is that they shove a planet out of chemical equilibrium and hold it there. So that’s the signature we go looking for elsewhere.
And the James Webb? It’s got a chance, I’ll give it that. But not a good one. The trouble is that the smallest signal it can reliably detect for anything is around 10 parts per million, meaning it simply can’t confidently measure an atmospheric signal fainter than that. For an Earth-like planet around a Sun-like star, the biosignature cocktail is much fainter than that. The James Webb could be staring straight at a living world and it would just look like noise.
Its one real shot is a rocky planet around a small red dwarf star. Because those stars are so dim, the planet’s atmosphere blocks a bigger fraction of the total light, boosting the signal. But that’s a genuine stroke of luck: you need such a system, and you need it close enough for the trick to work. Best case, we’re talking maybe two or three planets over the entire lifetime of the James Webb, and that’s just to have the chance to even glimpse biosignatures. Those two or three worlds could easily be dead, and statistically they probably are, because most worlds are dead.
So is it hopeless?
In Part 2, we meet the machine being designed for one job and one job only: to find another living Earth.
-
Trending3 weeks agoOverland couple killed in Guatemala after being deported by ICE
-
News2 weeks agoInterstellar Travel: the Birth of Fusion Drives
-
News2 weeks agoScientist Constructs “Big Picture” of Mars Water from Rover Data
-
Trending2 weeks agoFamily pushes for answers after 3 people found dead in Rocky Mount home days after electricity cut :: WRAL.com
-
Entertainment2 weeks agoSex is legal once a year in lame rom-com
-
Entertainment2 weeks agoPerez Hilton’s family says he’s ‘able to communicate’ after ‘suicide attempt’
-
News1 week agoSpaceX Junk Hits the Moon. Not a Good Sign
-
Trending2 weeks agoMets vs. Guardians: Lineups, broadcast info, and open thread, 8/5/26
