News
TESS Data Reveals 27 New Planet Candidates in Binary Systems
You’re doing some late afternoon work on the habitat as part of humanity’s first exoplanet settlement, but the sun is going down so you’re trying to speed things up. Just as the light dims, everything suddenly starts getting brighter. You look up and see the sun starting to rise again, except it’s your second sun. You kick yourself for not checking the daily sunrise and sunset logs, but you’re happy you get to put in a bit more work before you eat dinner.
This scenario might be centuries away from reality, but it hasn’t stopped an international team of present-day scientists from searching for exoplanets orbiting both stars in a two-star, also called circumbinary planets (CBPs). In findings recently published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, a team of researchers from the United States and Australia have brought us one step closer to better understanding these unique worlds and whether they’d be suitable for life beyond Earth.
For the study, the researchers examined new data from NASA’s Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) spacecraft regarding new circumbinary planets. What makes this study unique is it introduces a new method for identifying CBPs, with the longstanding method being the transit method, which involves measuring a dip in starlight as an exoplanet passes in front of its host star. However, this makes finding CBPs tricky since it must pass in front of both of its stars simultaneously. To combat this, the researchers used a method called apsidal precession, which measures the gradual twisting of the orbit’s shape that is produced from the gravitational influence by the planet on the stars.
After analyzing data from 1,590 eclipsing binary stars that exhibit apsidal precession, the researchers discovered 27 new candidate CBPs, but their physical properties like size remain inconclusive. The researchers noted how the radial velocity method, which is common exoplanet discovery method that measures the wobble between a star and planet, could be used to better characterize and confirm these 27 candidates.
“Identifying transits in binary systems clearly is challenging, but we’d like to know more about the range of planets that can form around two gravitationally bound stars,” said Margo Thornton, who is a PhD candidate at the University of New South Wales in Sydney and lead author of the study. “So, we developed a survey to search for planets using stellar eclipses that is not limited to the orientation of the planet’s orbit.”
This study is monumental in several ways, because not only did it successfully use a new method for identifying exoplanets, but the 27 CBP candidates could potentially more than double the total confirmed number of CBPs, which currently stands at 18. While it could take years to confirm these 27 candidates as real exoplanets, this new method nonetheless could open doors to identifying more CBPs faster and more efficiently than long-standing methods like the transit method. As noted, this is due to not requiring the CBP to align with both their stars to measure its transit. Instead, the apsidal precession method measures the orbital twisting that occurs as the planet exerts its gravitational influence on the stars.
Launched in April 2018, TESS was designed to be a successor to NASA’s Kepler mission and its follow-up K2 mission, with the latter being the same telescope just a different type of mission since the telescope’s steering wheels broke. While Kepler/K2 confirmed the existence of more than 3,300 exoplanets over more than 9.5 years, TESS has confirmed the existence of 855 exoplanets, along with more than 7,900 candidates. The primary difference between Kepler/K2 and TESS is the former focused on one patch of sky while TESS conducted an all-sky survey to find its exoplanets.
How many more circumbinary planets will scientists discover in the coming years and decades? Only time will tell, and this is why we science!
As always, keep doing science & keep looking up!
News
Largest fire ever recorded on Santa Rosa Island endangers ‘gem of California coast’
A wildfire sparked by the flare of a shipwrecked mariner has burned nearly a fifth of Santa Rosa Island and marks what officials called the largest blaze recorded on the island in modern history.
Firefighters ferried in personnel, equipment and pallets of supplies by boat amid gusty winds and rough seas as they raced to save sensitive wildlife, including the continent’s rarest species of pine tree. Preservationists were worried the flames could burn through pristine terrain unique to the region.
“It’s one of our gems of the California coast,” said Michael Cohen, chair of the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council. “It looks like it did 100 years ago — it’s just untouched.”
The fire had burned more than 10,000 acres and was 0% contained.
Flames spread up steep slopes, chewing through island chaparral, along with some grass and brush, said Mike Theune, fire information officer assigned to the incident.
Two historic buildings were destroyed — Johnson’s Lee Equipment Shed and the Wreck Line Camp Cabin — along with a storage structure, he said. A helicopter evacuated 11 employees of the National Park Service, which manages the island as part of the Channel Islands National Park, on Sunday.
Flames were about a half-mile from the island’s stand of Torrey pines — one of just two places in the world where the species grows naturally, Theune said. Firefighters were seeking to contain the fire using preexisting features such as roads, ridges and trails rather than carving a fire line through the island’s sensitive ecosystems, he said.
Each of the Channel Islands has endemic species and subspecies, including island foxes, that are found nowhere else, said Phyllis Grifman, vice chair of the advisory council. “They’re kind of known as the Galapagos of [North] America.”
Santa Rosa is home to six endemic plants, as well as the island spotted skunk and rare birds, Cohen said. It also has a rich cultural history — North America’s oldest definitively dated human remains were found here in 1959, and there are culturally significant Chumash sites, said Cohen, who is also president of the Santa Barbara Adventure Co.
The fire was inadvertently sparked by a man who crashed his sailboat into rocks on the island’s rugged south side and then fired emergency flares to signal for help, according to the U.S. Coast Guard and eyewitness accounts.
Jace Malone, who helms the New Hustler sportfishing boat, saw smoke around 9:30 a.m. Friday and drove closer to the island so the children on his boat could take a look. Then he saw someone waving.
A man stood on a small sliver of unburned land, surrounded by scorched vegetation, Malone said. Small pieces of his vessel were scattered among the rocks. He’d somehow scratched “SOS” into the blackened earth, a photo released by the Coast Guard shows.
A Coast Guard Air Station Ventura MH-60T Jayhawk aircrew rescued a 67-year-old mariner after his sailboat crashed into the rocks at Santa Rosa Island.
(U.S. Coast Guard)
Malone called the Coast Guard, which sent a helicopter to hoist the man up, he said. The mariner, who was not seriously injured, had spent Thursday night stranded on the island, the agency said in a social media post.
Windy conditions initially fanned the flames and made it difficult for firefighters to reach the blaze. A gale warning was in effect from Friday night to early Monday, and forecasters had warned boats of all sizes to remain in harbor, said Bryan Lewis, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service in Oxnard.
Winds also precluded the use of water-dropping aircraft: Firefighters attempted one drop, but the wind blew the water away before it reached the ground, Theune said.
Still, firefighters reached the island less than 12 hours after the fire was confirmed, which “was no easy feat,” he said. They traveled by boat, which he described as the most time-efficient mode of transport and also necessary to accommodate all the supplies needed to fight a wildfire. “That’s what makes fighting a fire like this different, as opposed to mainland firefight where we can drive in trucks and equipment,” he said.
A firefighting aircraft was able to fly over the fire Monday and was conferring with firefighters on the ground to decide whether it would be possible to use more aircraft, Theune said. About 70 people were assigned to the fire, and more were on the way, he said.
The last major fire on the Channel Islands was the Scorpion fire, which burned 1,368 acres on Santa Cruz Island in 2020.
News
Millions Recovered in FIFA Corruption Scandal May Now Be Missing Again Before World Cup
Ahead of the World Cup, the head of South American soccer faces an ethics complaint he received payments recovered from a 2015 investigation that shook global soccer.
News
What If the Universe Had No Beginning? Part 2: No Boundary, No Problem
(This is Part 2 of a series on Hawking’s no-boundary proposal. Read Part 1 first.)
I thought the whole point of this program was that we couldn’t just…get to the beginning of the universe, and now, thanks to the magic of Wheeler and DeWitt, we have the precise machinery we need to solve the beginning of the universe….if only we knew one thing, just one tiny piece of information, just one measly morsel…and we could do it.
Hawking did it. Well, he had an idea, which is more than anyone else had at the time.
Two decades after Wheeler and DeWitt, Stephen Hawking comes along and connects, as he usually does, several different lines of thought, and he realizes that the problem for one thing is actually the solution to another.
Check this out: Hawking is staring at the Wheeler-DeWitt equation. It’s a puzzle that reveals the universe, but all the puzzle pieces are scattered around, AND we don’t have the picture on the front of the box. If we know how to place just ONE piece, we can put together the quantum wave function of the universe.
We just need the first piece. The boundary condition that defines the beginning state of the universe. But we can’t measure it, we can’t read any device or look through any telescope to figure it out. Nothing gives us access to the first moment of the big bang. AND we have no theory of quantum gravity around the corner to just ASK.
So that leaves us with…taking a wild guess and seeing if it sticks.
Hawking decided that his wild guess would be as grounded as possible. He argued that the best boundary condition of the universe, the best statement that you can make about how it all gets started, had to be SELF-JUSTIFYING. That means the guess about the beginning of the universe couldn’t come from anywhere else: you can’t point to God or Wheeler or ANYTHING to just HAND you the answer, because the universe is every single thing to ever exist, in totality, and you can’t reach OUTSIDE that. There’s no hidden corner of the cabinet that exists outside the universe to just give us the boundary.
And the most self-justifying statement Hawking could make about the beginning of the universe is that it had no beginning.
In other words, what if the reason you can’t find the boundary at the beginning of the universe is not because it’s hidden or inaccessible, but because it genuinely isn’t there?
Now this is a very lovely thought to have. But we’re not here for lovely thoughts, we’re here for down and dirty physics. It’s one thing to say something crazy, it’s another to turn that into a working theory of nature. Thankfully, Hawking had exactly what he needed.
One of the defining features of the Wheeler-DeWitt equation is that it doesn’t involve time. It doesn’t know or care that the universe evolves, expands, does interesting things, heads out to dinner on a Tuesday night just because it’s wild like that.
The key that can unlock the Wheeler-DeWitt equation is a solid statement ABOUT time, specifically, the most important time of all: the beginning of the universe. So we NEED to involve time SOMEHOW in all this mess if we’re going to make progress.
So Hawking…involves time. Instead of just looking at space, he stitches together these geometries back to back like frames in a film. He makes a sequence of them, representing an evolution to the history of the universe. These frames tell the story of the cosmos. Now, we don’t know what that story is (I mean, from Wheeler and DeWitt’s machine; we can observe it and so we KNOW it, but we’re trying to EXPLAIN it), so Hawking constructs all these…paths. Possible histories of the universe. Trajectories, evolutions, stories. In some stories, the universe gets really big really fast and fizzles out to nothing. In others, it never even expands. In still others, there’s nothing but matter. And others, nothing but…nothing.
Now all of these paths, all of these histories of the universe, all share one thing in common: they’re in the usual spacetime that we know and love. Cause and effect, past and future, speed of light, all that. And they all have a BEGINNING. A first frame in the movie of the universe.
Well, what if we just made time behave differently? Now I’m going to share a term with you, and when I say it it’s going to sound really wrong, like icky, deep in your gut. But I’m going to say it, then I’m going to explain it. It…will still feel icky, but at least it will have an explanation.
Here goes: imaginary time.
Yeah, imaginary time. Time, but imaginary. Listen, I don’t know how much you know about imaginary numbers. But they’re really cool and fun and DEFINITELY worth bringing up in your next workplace all-hands meeting. The core idea behind imaginary numbers is to pretend to take the square root of, I don’t know, negative 4. The square root of regular four is 2, but the square root of negative four is…uh….what? In normal grade school math this is where your teacher scoffs at you and says you can’t take the square root of a negative number.
But this isn’t grade school. We’re not going to take the square root of a negative number. Instead, we’re going to say that the square roots of negative numbers are an ENTIRELY NEW KIND OF NUMBER. A brand new category. You have whole numbers, rational numbers, negatives, and now you have imaginary numbers, which are all the square roots of the negative numbers.
Phew, I swear I’m going somewhere with this.
The trick Hawking pulled was that he took all these histories of spacetime and replaced “time” with “imaginary time”. He multiplied the passage of time by the square root of negative one. Now, we actually do this in quantum mechanics all the time (or should I say imaginary time?) as a TRICK. Sometimes when we get equations that are really, really hard to solve, we replace time with imaginary time and they become easier. Then we solve them, then we swap back. Just a little reshuffling in the backend to work through some thorny problems.
But when Hawking does this to the spacetime of the universe, he gets a bonus. It’s not a party trick anymore. It’s a statement. You see, in normal spacetime, the universe has a beginning. But when you replace time with imaginary time, the beginning…goes away. This procedure actually puts space and time on equal footing. It makes them all creatures of curvature and geometry, with no separate identity. Which makes the beginning of the universe no special time at all. It becomes like the south pole, which is really just any other point on the globe. You reach the south pole and keep walking, and it’s only ever north from there. You reach the beginning of the universe, and it’s not special or unique (maybe a little hot); all you have is the future in front of you.
No beginning. No start. No boundary. A universe that justifies itself.
By making the switch to imaginary time, Hawking could ENCODE his “the universe has no beginning” idea, AND he could crunch through the math.
Voila: a key that unlocks the Wheeler-DeWitt equation and the know-how to run the mathematical machinery.
And what do you get for all this work? Nothing less than a wave function for the universe.
In Part 3, the wave function delivers something Hawking didn’t even ask for: our universe, more or less, for free.
-
Entertainment2 weeks agoBeyoncé is a sparkly skeleton on the Met Gala 2026 red carpet with Blue Ivy and Jay-Z
-
Trending3 weeks agoUpdated 2026 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs Bracket, Schedule and Top Highlights from April 29
-
Entertainment3 weeks agoKeke Palmer, Zara Larsson, Teyana Taylor and more
-
Trending3 weeks agoNew York Knicks vs. Atlanta Hawks Live Score and Stats – April 30, 2026 Gametracker
-
Trending2 weeks agoCoinbase didn’t just lay off 14% of its staff due to AI. It replaced managers with ‘player-coaches’ and turned its org chart upside down
-
Trending3 weeks agoJessica Biel Allegedly Delivers an ‘Ultimatum’ to Justin Timberlake — And It Sounds Serious
-
Trending2 weeks agoTaylor Swift may have hinted at ‘Toy Story 5’ collab. What happened
-
Trending2 weeks agoStock market news for May 1, 2026
