Los Angeles City Councilmember Nithya Raman surged past reality television personality Spencer Pratt in the city’s mayoral primary election Sunday, capping off a five-day turnaround after she fell behind to Pratt on election night.

Raman now sits in second place with Pratt in third, according to the latest vote count from the Los Angeles Registrar-Recorder. Raman had 27.1% of the votes counted so far, and Pratt had 26.7%.

Both are vying to compete in a Nov. 3 runoff against Mayor Karen Bass, who garnered 34.7% of the vote as of Sunday, and whom the Associated Press already determined has qualified for the runoff.

“We are encouraged by the latest vote count and remain grateful to the thousands of Angelenos who have powered this campaign,” Raman said in a statement issued by her campaign.

Bass campaign spokesman Alex Stack said that if Raman maintains that position, the mayor would “look forward to winning a contest against an opponent who allows encampments near schools and fights against hiring more cops, yet is MIA on saving Hollywood jobs and fighting back when ICE invades L.A.”

Mail-in ballots with a June 2 election day postmark will continue to be accepted by county election officials through Tuesday.

Pratt took an early lead over Raman on election night, but Raman’s numbers improved steadily as mail-in ballots were counted, leading political observers to begin predicting this weekend that she would eventually overtake Pratt.

Mayoral candidate Nithya Raman smiles during her election night party at Boomtown Brewery on June 2 in Los Angeles.

(Gina Ferazzi / Los Angeles Times)

“I think it’s over,” Democratic political consultant Michael Trujillo said Saturday night, after the daily vote tally showed Raman just 1 percentage point behind Pratt. “It appears Nithya will be in the runoff. Pratt doesn’t appear to be growing much more.”

Analysts say Pratt, a registered Republican, likely appealed to conservative voters, many of whom were expected to have cast their votes early. Raman, by comparison, is a progressive democratic socialist. Analysts say younger, progressive voters tend to hold onto their ballots longer than conservatives.

What’s more, many Democrats were believed to have held onto their mail-in ballots until the eleventh hour as they waited to choose between Democratic gubernatorial candidates.

“We’ve seen Nithya Raman catching up on every update,” said Paul Mitchell, vice president of the bipartisan voter data firm Political Data Inc., late Saturday.

Pratt, who came to fame as the villain on MTV’s reality show “The Hills,” turned the mayor’s race into a national story, becoming a darling of conservative media pundits on Fox News. President Trump, while not endorsing Pratt outright, offered words of support, saying he “heard he’s a big MAGA person.”

On Sunday, Pratt reminded his supporters that the ballot counting will continue in the coming weeks.

“They’re not the only ones who know where to find votes,” he wrote on X before the latest tally was released, adding a winking emoji.

Should Raman make the runoff, she would probably pose a serious threat to Bass. Despite entering the race at the filing deadline, she had a strong presence on social media. Her years on the council have also given her a deep understanding of the issues facing the city.

In a head-to-head matchup, Raman would beat Bass 32% to 28%, according to a poll of registered voters conducted last month by the UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies, which was co-sponsored by The Times. The poll said 25% would choose neither or wouldn’t vote, and 15% were undecided.

During the four-month primary campaign, Raman offered withering critiques of Bass’ first term, saying the mayor failed to act with urgency on homelessness, apartment construction, street repairs and the exodus of entertainment jobs from the region.

Raman assailed Bass’ decision to negotiate an expensive package of raises with the city’s police officers, saying the deal “bankrupted the city.” And she opposed the $2.6-billion upgrade of the Convention Center, saying it would divert funds away from core city services.

Bass has pushed back on Raman’s assertions, saying she secured two consecutive years of reductions in homelessness — the first recorded in city history — and fast-tracked approval of 40,000 units of affordable housing. The mayor defended the Convention Center project, arguing it would boost tourism, while saying the police raises were needed to keep the department’s ranks from shrinking more than they already have since 2020.

Raman wasn’t endorsed by any of her colleagues on the City Council, and she has been criticized by some community leaders in her district for not paying close enough attention to their concerns.

In recent weeks, Bass has offered her own critical assessment of Raman, saying the democratic socialist struggled to work closely with others — even her own allies. Backers of the mayor accused Raman of changing her position on an array of topics, including police hiring, the city’s anti-encampment law and even who should be mayor.

Mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt speaks to the media outside an election night party at Don Antonio’s Mexican restaurant on June 2 in Los Angeles.

(Ronaldo Bolaños / Los Angeles Times)

“It is waffling,” Melina Abdullah, the co-founder of Black Lives Matter Los Angeles, said before the election about Raman’s changes on LAPD and no-camping zones. “We want to be sure we can hold her to her word. Right now we haven’t been able to.”

Bass looked like a shoo-in when she launched her reelection campaign in 2024. At that point, she received credit for moving swiftly to clear homeless encampments across the city, and to move their occupants into hotels, motels and other temporary facilities. Many of the region’s politicians, including Raman herself, sought her endorsement.

Things changed in January 2025, when Bass was more than 7,000 miles away at a diplomatic function in Ghana when the Palisades fire broke out. Many voters viewed Bass’ response to the fire as a failure of leadership. Pratt, who lost his Pacific Palisades home in the fire, blamed Bass for the loss and said it triggered his entry into the race.

Supporters of Bass portrayed Raman’s decision to jump in the race as a betrayal. Raman pushed back on that narrative, saying she provided key assistance to Bass in 2022, helping her defeat real estate developer Rick Caruso.

On July 1st, 2025, the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) station announced the detection of another interstellar object (ISO) passing through our Solar System. Following on the heels of 1I/’Oumuamua in 2017 and 2I/Borisov in 2019, 3I/ATLAS became the third ISO to be witnessed by astronomers in the space of eight years. Like 2I/Borisov, this latest visitor began venting gas and dust as soon as it began approaching the Sun, indicating that it was clearly a comet.

But in keeping with the notion that extraterrestrials could be sending probes to interstellar space, scientists conducted a technosignature search of this object, just to be sure (much as they had of 1I/’Oumuamua and 2I/Borisov). In a recent study, a team led by researchers at the SETI Institute released the results of their survey, which “did not find any signals worthy of additional follow-up.” Nevertheless, the study set upper limits on radio detection that will come in handy the next time an ISO comes around.

The team was led by Sofia Sheikh, a Technosignature Research Scientist and NSF MPS-Ascend Fellow and multiple researchers from the SETI Institute. They were joined by researchers from Breakthrough Listen, the Berkeley SETI Research Center, the Jodrell Bank Center for Astrophysics (JBCA), and multiple universities worldwide. The paper detailing their findings appeared in The Astronomical Journal.

*The ATA at the Hat Creek Observatory in Northern California. Credit: Seth Shostak/SETI Institute*

Interstellar objects (ISOs) present a rare opportunity for astronomers to study how other planetary systems form and evolve. Since asteroids and comets are essentially leftover material from the formation of planets, their composition can tell scientists a lot about other star systems, without the burden of having to send missions there. Since humanity has an established history of sending probes to interstellar space – Pioneer 10* and 11*, Voyager 1* and 2*, and the New Horizons mission – there is always the possibility that an interstellar visitor could be an extraterrestrial messenger.

Scientists at the SETI Institute examined 3I/ATLAS for signs of technological activity (technosignatures) using the Allen Telescope Array (ATA) at the Hat Creek Radio Observatory. As they report in their study, they scanned the ISO for more than 7 hours across a wide range of radio frequencies – covering 1 to 9 gigahertz (GHz). This broad range allowed them to search for narrowband radio signals not found in nature, which would be evidence of technology.

The team initially identified 74 million narrowband signals, which were then filtered to eliminate radio-frequency interference (RFI). From this, they identified 211 signals of interest, which were visually inspected in the time-frequency domain. None of these were found to be artificial in nature, which was expected, given the composition and behavior of the object. As Dr. Sheikh said in a SETI Institute release:

Eventually, our own Voyager spacecraft will be extraterrestrial artifacts in other stellar systems. Given that, it is important that we understand the natural distribution of interstellar objects so that we will be able to identify any anomalies that could one day be signs of an artificial interstellar object.

While no technosignatures were found, the observations place upper limits on the power of any radio transmitter on or near 3I/ATLAS. Specifically, they ruled out signals stronger than about 10-110 watts over the detected frequencies. The study also demonstrates the ATA’s rapid response to new interstellar objects, given that observations began less than a day after 3I/ATLAS was first detected.

*Artist’s impression of interstellar comet 2I/Borisov. Credit: NRAO/AUI/NSF, S. Dagnello*

According to co-author Valeria Garcia Lopez, a physics professor at Furman University and a member of Breakthrough Listen at UC Berkeley, this demonstrated the capabilities of modern instruments in identifying possible technosignatures. “The results from 3I/ATLAS show how realistic it is to detect a signal with the technology we have today,” she said. “That is why it is important to keep searching for technosignatures, even from objects we might not expect to have signals.”

The study of ISOs also helps scientists better understand the natural properties of objects that are regularly ejected from star systems. It also allows them to probe the interstellar medium (ISM) by examining the effects billions of years of traveling through space have on these objects. As more ISOs are discovered, each presents a new opportunity to learn more about the cosmos and to search for possible evidence of extraterrestrial civilizations.

Further Reading: SETI Institute, The Astronomical Journal