News
What Happens When Light Goes Boom? Part 4: What Brad Bradington Is Good For
(This is the final part of a series on Cherenkov radiation — the “light boom.” Read Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3 first.)
So we know what Cherenkov radiation is. We know how it works. We know that Pavel Cherenkov spent three years poking a glowing bottle of water before anyone believed him.
Now: what is it good for?
The answer, it turns out, is quite a lot. Cherenkov radiation shows up in some of the most dramatic, extreme, and important contexts in modern physics. And also, wonderfully, in hospitals.
Let’s start with the most visceral image in all of nuclear physics.
You’ve probably seen photographs of nuclear reactors — the ones where the fuel rods are submerged in a deep pool of water, and the water glows. That electric, otherworldly blue. It looks almost supernatural. Like something from a science fiction film. Like the reactor has a soul, and it’s blue.
That glow is Cherenkov radiation.
The reactor’s fuel rods are constantly releasing high-energy electrons and other decay products that travel through the surrounding water faster than light moves in water. And each of those particles drags a cone of blue light behind it. Billions of them, constantly, all producing that steady cold impossible-looking glow.
What makes this particularly striking is that it’s one of the very few places in all of physics where a genuinely relativistic phenomenon is directly visible to the naked eye. Most of the deep results of modern physics are invisible to human perception. You can’t see an electron. You can’t watch a quark change flavor. You can’t directly perceive spacetime curving around a massive object. You have to trust your instruments, trust your colleagues, trust the math.
But the Cherenkov glow in a reactor pool? You just look at it. That’s the light wake of particles outracing light. That’s a consequence of Maxwell’s equations and special relativity, visible and blue, right in front of you. No mediation required.
That’s Brad Bradington, sprinting through water, leaving light in his wake. The reactor’s heartbeat, made visible.
Here’s something humbling: we didn’t invent Cherenkov radiation. The universe has been doing this constantly, everywhere, for billions of years, completely without our input or appreciation.
The upper atmosphere of Earth is continuously bombarded by cosmic rays — high-energy particles streaming in from supernovae, neutron stars, black hole jets, and other extreme corners of the universe. When these particles slam into the atmosphere, they create cascades of secondary particles, many of which are moving faster than light moves in air.
The result: brief, faint, downward-pointing cones of blue and ultraviolet Cherenkov light, flashing constantly in the upper atmosphere, all over the planet, day and night, right now. You can’t see them from the ground — they’re too faint, and the sky is too bright. But they’re there. They’ve been there since long before there was anyone to notice them, or care, or build experiments around them.
Once we knew the universe was doing this, we decided to watch.
A class of instrument called an Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescope — IACT — does exactly what the name suggests. These are large mirror arrays built at high-altitude, dark-sky sites, pointed upward. They’re not looking for light from stars or galaxies. They’re watching for the faint Cherenkov flashes produced when very-high-energy gamma rays from space hit the upper atmosphere.
When an extreme-energy gamma ray enters the atmosphere, it creates a narrow, intense cascade of secondary particles — all of them moving faster than light in air — all producing Cherenkov radiation in a tight downward cone. The flash lasts only a few nanoseconds. The telescope has to catch it instantly and reconstruct the direction and energy of the original gamma ray from the shape of the flash.
The major instruments are MAGIC on La Palma in the Canary Islands, H.E.S.S. in Namibia, and VERITAS in Arizona. Between them, they’ve mapped the gamma ray sky in extraordinary detail — finding the remnants of supernovae, the jets of active galactic nuclei, the neighborhoods of pulsars — because the atmosphere itself is the detector, and the Cherenkov flash is the signal. We took a phenomenon we didn’t create and turned it into one of the most powerful tools in high-energy astrophysics.
The most audacious application of Cherenkov radiation isn’t a telescope pointed at the sky. It’s buried in the ice beneath the South Pole.
IceCube is a neutrino detector. Neutrinos are extraordinarily difficult to detect — they have no charge, almost no mass, and interact with matter so rarely that trillions of them pass through your body every second without leaving a trace. Catching one requires either enormous patience, enormous volumes of material, or both.
IceCube chose enormous volumes. It contains over 5,000 optical sensors embedded in a full cubic kilometer of Antarctic ice, monitoring the permanent darkness for flashes of blue light.
Here’s how it works. Occasionally — very occasionally — a high-energy neutrino passing through the ice will interact with an atomic nucleus and produce a charged particle, usually a muon. That muon, if it’s energetic enough, travels faster than light moves in ice. And when it does, it produces Cherenkov radiation: a faint cone of blue light, spreading outward through the ice as the muon moves.
The sensors catch those photons. The timing and pattern of hits across thousands of sensors allows physicists to reconstruct the direction the muon was traveling — and therefore the direction the neutrino came from — and therefore the location in the universe where something violent enough to produce such an energetic neutrino must have happened.
The most elusive particles in the universe, detected not by catching them but by the light wake they leave when they’re not quite elusive enough. Brad Bradington, moving through a cubic kilometer of Antarctic ice, leaving footprints made of light.
And then there are hospitals.
PET scanning — positron emission tomography — works by injecting a patient with a radioactive tracer that emits positrons as it decays. A positron is the antimatter partner of an electron. When a positron meets an electron inside the patient’s body — which happens almost immediately, because electrons are everywhere — the two annihilate and produce a pair of high-energy gamma ray photons flying off in exactly opposite directions.
Those gamma rays travel faster than light moves through human tissue.
They produce Cherenkov radiation. The direction and timing of those faint flashes can be used to reconstruct exactly where inside the patient the annihilation happened — which tells doctors where the radioactive tracer accumulated — which reveals where the metabolically active tissue is — which can identify tumors, measure blood flow, and map neurological activity.
Brad Bradington, in a very real and non-metaphorical sense, is helping diagnose cancer.
Pavel Cherenkov’s glow in a bottle of water in 1934 has become: the visible heartbeat of a nuclear reactor. The constant invisible light show in our upper atmosphere. The foundation of gamma ray astronomy across three continents. A cubic kilometer of Antarctic ice bristling with sensors hunting the universe’s most elusive particles. A medical imaging technology used millions of times a year in hospitals around the world.
Not bad for something every previous scientist wrote off as fluorescence.
The best discoveries in science often start the same way. Not with a grand announcement. Not with a eureka moment. Not with the immediate recognition of their importance.
Just a careful person, in a quiet lab, looking at something everyone else has already looked at — and thinking:
Huh. That’s weird.
News
Elderly couple dies in Santa Monica home fire

The Santa Monica Fire Department is investigating an early-morning blaze on Sunday that claimed the lives of an elderly couple living in a two-story home.
The department has yet to release the identities of the victims who lived in the older English Tudor-style home in the 500 block of Lincoln Boulevard, but their relatives have been notified, according to A Platoon Battalion Chief James Altman.
Firefighters responded to a call shortly before 3 a.m. and found the home engulfed in flames.
Altman said fire crews found two bodies in the first-floor bedroom of the residence. The victims were pronounced dead at the scene.
The couple at the residence were in their 90s and usually had a caretaker with them. But no one was on duty at the time, Altman said.
The department has yet to determine a cause for the fire, Altman said.
The Lincoln Boulevard blaze was Santa Monica’s second fatal residential blaze in recent months. An elderly man died after a June 5 fire broke out in a second-floor apartment in a building in the 2600 block of 5th Street.
News
Israel Rejects Trump’s 15-Point Plan to Disarm Hamas
President Trump’s Board of Peace announced an agreement last month that aimed at Hamas’s giving up its weapons alongside an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza.
News
Astronomers Find a New Object from the Early Universe Using Webb Data
Since it became operational in 2022, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has released some truly breathtaking views of the cosmos. These images highlight how advancements since the days of the venerable Hubble Space Telescope are now providing the deepest and clearest views of the cosmos to date. This was especially evident with the galaxy cluster MACS J0308.9+2645, a deep field image originally taken by Hubble showcasing galaxy clusters and several gravitational lenses.
These lenses, in turn, revealed even more distant galaxies that existed 13 billion years ago, when the Universe was just 1 billion years old. These galaxies appear as distorted “gravitational arcs” in the image, their light having been warped and amplified by the MACS J0308.9+2645 cluster’s gravitational field. As it turns out, there were more galaxies remaining to be found. In a recent paper, astrophysicist Homer Dávila Gutierrez identified another gravitational arc candidate in the galaxy cluster MACS J0308.9+2645.
Dr. Gutierrez is the founder and director of SKYCR.ORG, the leading Spanish-language news source for astronomy and space exploration, the first Costa Rican elected Fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society (FRAS), and a member of the European Astronomical Society (EAS). He reported the finding of the arc candidate (A1) after searching through JWST archival Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam) data gathered through Webb’s General Observation (GO) 5293 campaign.
A conceptual diagram of the gravitational lens system MG J0414+0534. Credit: NAOJ, K. T. Inoue
Gravitational lenses are a phenomenon originally predicted by Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity, in which objects with mass alter the curvature of spacetime around them. When light intersects with a gravitational field, it traces this curvature, which amplifies and distorts it. For decades, astronomers have used these lenses (created by objects in the foreground) to observe light from more distant, fainter objects located behind them.
The galaxy candidate Dr. Gutierrez observed is characteristic of this phenomenon, having an elongated and curved morphology. He found A1 while searching through 54 public JWST/NIRCam fields and evaluating 1,591 possible candidates. Of these, only A1 was considered a robust candidate for a gravitational arc that could have existed when the Universe was very young. As Dr. Gutierrez told Universe Today via email, there are three things that make A1 stand out from the rest:
First, its geometry: A1 is extremely elongated (axis ratio ~6.5) and aligned tangentially with respect to the cluster center to within about a degree – exactly the orientation gravitational lensing produces. Second, its brightness: it is the brightest of the highly elongated sources at that radius, which made it measurable. And third, its absence from every catalog: it does not appear in the published strong-lensing inventory of this cluster, nor in SIMBAD, NED, or VizieR. \
When I contacted the GO-5293 team, they confirmed it did not overlap with the systems they were analyzing. A real, bright, uncatalogued arc-like source in a massive Planck-selected cluster – that is what made it worth pursuing.
After conducting a multi-band analysis with the EAZY (Easy and Accurate Zphot from Yale) photometric tool, Dr. Gutierrez obtained a redshift value of z ≈ 4.4, placing A1 within the first billion years of the Universe. This was followed by analysis with the tool developed by Israeli astrophysicist Ana Acebron and collaborators in 2018 that placed constraints on the mass of the MACS J0308.9+2645 cluster. From this, he determined that A1 was subject to a magnification factor of seven.
The little red dots could represent galaxies in an evolutionary phase predating the luminous quasar phase. Credit: NASA/ESA/CSA/ISTA)/ETH Zurich/NAOJ
While the analysis is evolving and follow-up observations are needed, there are still some characteristics that can be gleaned from the data. Said Dr, Gutierrez:
With the corrected photometry, A1 is a galaxy at z ≈ 1.4 — we see it as it was roughly 9 billion years ago — lying behind the cluster MACS J0308.9+2645 (z = 0.356), one of the most massive clusters known. Its light passed close to the cluster on its way to us, and the working interpretation, shared by the program team’s lensing experts, is that it is a singly lensed image: stretched and modestly magnified by the cluster’s gravity, but not multiply imaged.
Its projected position, about 51 arcseconds from the cluster’s X-ray center, and its tangential elongation are consistent with that picture. The definitive test — an updated lens model of the cluster built from the new JWST data — is in progress.
The analysis also revealed a second potential candidate, designed A2, which has similar geometry to A1. This light source is significantly fainter, smaller, more elongated, and its photometry is less constrained. It also has a similar projected distance from the central cluster as A1. “And that matters: the photometric issue that affected A1’s original redshift estimate — catalog aperture magnitudes that capture only a small fraction of an extended source’s light — applies even more strongly to a faint source like A2. So I treat its nature and redshift as open questions pending the same corrected reanalysis I applied to A1,” said Dr. Gutierrez.
The exciting thing about these results is that they imply that there could be many more early galaxy candidates hiding in Webb’s data.
Webb’s public archive is growing faster than anyone can fully exploit, and this find shows that genuine discoveries are sitting in already-released data, accessible to any researcher willing to do careful work. But there is a second lesson, just as important: automated catalog photometry can badly mislead you for extended sources — in this case it initially suggested a much higher redshift — so verification, independent remeasurement, and contact with the original program team are essential.
The most rewarding part of this process has been exactly that: the GO-5293 team responded generously, confirmed the object was uncatalogued, and we are now working with their updated lens model to establish A1’s nature definitively. Independent researchers and program teams collaborating over public data — that is Webb’s archive working exactly as intended.
The work is currently being reviewed for publication in the journal Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan.
-
Trending2 weeks agoOverland couple killed in Guatemala after being deported by ICE
-
News2 weeks agoLucky 13! Starship Deploys Starlink Satellites and Splashes Down Intact
-
Entertainment2 weeks agoJohn Cusack reveals why he stepped away from Hollywood after decades of films
-
Entertainment2 weeks agoEric Dane called ‘Euphoria’ his most ‘profound’ work amid ALS battle
-
News2 weeks agoThis Long Beach spot is where food trucks are born
-
Trending2 weeks agoFormer IMMAF Champions Abdul Hussein and Magomed Tuchalov set for UFC debuts in Abu Dhabi
-
Entertainment2 weeks agoJohnny Depp is nearly unrecognizable at Comic-Con promoting new movie
-
Entertainment2 weeks agoBret Michaels undergoes emergency surgery after performing 3 concerts in ‘intense’ pain
