News
Are Neutrinos Their Own Evil Twins? Part 1: So We’re Going to Redefine “Particle”
On March 25, 1938, a 31-year-old physicist named Ettore Majorana bought a ticket for a ferry from Palermo to Naples. That night, before boarding, he sent a letter to Antonio Carrelli, director of the Naples Physics Institute:
Dear Carrelli,
I made a decision that has become unavoidable. There isn’t a bit of selfishness in it, but I realize what trouble my sudden disappearance will cause you and the students. For this as well, I beg your forgiveness, but especially for betraying the trust, the sincere friendship, and the sympathy you gave me over the past months.
I ask you to remember me to all those I learned to know and appreciate in your Institute, especially Sciuti: I will keep a fond memory of them all at least until 11 pm tonight, possibly later too.
*— E. Majorana*
He was never seen again.
Enrico Fermi — affectionately known as the Pope of Physics — had this to say about him: “There are several categories of scientists in the world. Those of second or third rank do their best but never get very far. Then there is the first rank, those who make important discoveries, fundamental to scientific progress. But then there are the geniuses, like Galileo and Newton. Majorana was one of these.”
One year before he disappeared, Majorana published his last paper. A strange, quiet little paper that most physicists ignored at the time. It described a theoretical possibility — a particle that is its own antiparticle. Something that shouldn’t be able to exist. Something that, if it does exist, just might unlock the future of physics.
We still don’t know what happened to Ettore Majorana.
And we still don’t know if he was right.
Yes this series is going to be about neutrinos, because of course it is. Neutrinos, if you’ll recall from previous rage-filled diatribes on the subject, are awful. They spoil everything. We basically had all of physics figured out (I’m exaggerating but vibe with me) until the neutrino came along. It doesn’t behave. It doesn’t follow the rules. It doesn’t care about your standard model and your Nobel prizes and your fancy equations. The neutrino is just going to exist and it’s going to do its own thing and it’s going to be PERFECTLY HAPPY WITH THAT.
Listen folks, if you PROPOSED the existence of neutrinos, even TODAY, RIGHT NOW, with no evidence you would be LAUGHED OUT OF THE ROOM, which would be humiliating.
Neutrinos don’t care about your feelings.
And I’m going to tell you EXACTLY how neutrinos break every single rule that we happen to care about. But to do that, I need to explain what a particle is, probably in a way that you’ve never heard before, so please secure any loose items and keep your arms and legs inside the ride at all times, because we’re about to get weird.
Particles aren’t really particles.
At least, not in the way we usually think about it.
We’re used to a simple conception of a particle. Like an electron. It has properties that we can measure. Mass, charge, spin. We can point to it. We can throw them across the room. We can trade them. Even in the quantum field picture, we can still treat an electron as an OBJECT, a thing, a concrete fixture that exists as a unique and independent entity in the universe.
So…that’s wrong.
Think about your hands. Or just look at them. Regard them. Your left hand and your right hand are mirror images of each other. They have the same fingers, the same basic structure, the same everything — except they’re fundamentally, irreducibly different. You can’t rotate your left hand into your right hand. You can flip it, you can twist it, you can wave it around like you just don’t care, and it will always be a left hand. There is no sequence of moves that transforms one into the other.
That property — that built-in handedness that can’t be changed — is called chirality. And it shows up everywhere in nature. Certain molecules are chiral. DNA is chiral. Life itself has a preference: almost every amino acid in your body is left-handed. Why? Nobody really knows. But the universe apparently has opinions about handedness.
So do particles.
A particle moving through space has a direction — it’s going somewhere. And a particle also has spin — it’s rotating, in a quantum mechanical sense that doesn’t map perfectly onto a spinning top but is close enough for our purposes. Like a spinning bullet flying through the air. The relationship between those two things — which way the particle is moving, and which way it’s spinning — gives the particle a handedness. If the spin aligns with the direction of motion, we call it right-handed. If it’s opposite, left-handed.
Now, the picture I just described is called HELICITY, which can change from your point of view. If you race past a speeding, spinning bullet and look behind you, it looks like it’s moving AWAY from you, not TOWARDS you, so its handedness flips.
So for particles we use a different assignment of handedness called CHIRALITY that doesn’t depend on how you look at it. It’s a real physical property, just like mass and charge. A left-handed particle and a right-handed particle are, in a deep sense, different objects, just like your hands. Almost perfectly the same, but different orientations of existence. Mirror images of each other.
For massless particles, the chirality can’t change. Neither can the helicity. In fact for massless particles they’re the exact same thing. Why? Because you can’t race past a photon and look behind you. So once a photon is born with a particular handedness, either left- or right-handed, it stays that way forever.
The same is NOT true for massive particles. Massive particles, as they travel, actually flip their chirality as they move! Left, right, left, right. It’s like if you took a right-handed glove and threw it, and as it traveled it magically switched between right and left hands.
And the thing that causes, say, an electron to flip back and forth? Why, it’s the Higgs field. As an electron moves, it’s constantly interacting with the Higgs. And every time it does, it switches between right- and left-handed. Like someone walking through a crowded room, and every time they reach out for a handshake, it’s a different hand.
The Higgs mechanism is what gives particles mass. The switching BETWEEN left- and right-handed versions IS mass.
When you watch an electron whizz by you, you’re not watching a single, whole, unitary particle. You’re watching TWO of them. A left-hander and a right-hander, constantly flipping back and forth. At one moment, you would see a MASSLESS left-handed particle. Then in the next instant you would see a MASSLESS right-handed particle.
How frequently these particles swap hands is controlled by how easily they interact with the Higgs. Every time they interact, they switch, and that frequency of switching IS THE MASS.
So in other words, what we call the property of “mass” is really a measure of how often twin left- and right-hand particles swap places as they travel.
All massive particles in the universe do this.
Except neutrinos.
In Part 2, we meet the one force in nature that actually cares which hand you use — and why the neutrino’s relationship with it is so deeply strange.
News
As Trump Mulls Decision About Iran War Deal, a Restive Middle East Waits to Hear
The president has wavered on whether to move ahead with an agreement with Iran to end the war. On Friday, he vowed to make a “final determination” soon.
News
MAVEN Spacecraft Finds New Plasma Squeezing at Mars
A cloaked alien invasion force is approaching Earth and coming up on Mars. The first officer looks through a viewfinder and says, “Captain, the fourth planet’s atmosphere is behaving strangely. As though it were trying to block incoming energy.” The captain takes a moment, then his (already big) eyes get wide and he exclaims, “It’s a defense shield! The Earthlings are hiding on the fourth planet and are prepared to attack us! Abort the invasion!” The first officer responds, “Aye aye, Captain!”
While the tale above is clearly fictionalized (aliens probably don’t say “Aye aye”), it briefly describes a unique atmospheric phenomenon called the Zwan-Wolf effect and occurs when the solar wind interacts with the Earth’s magnetic field, the latter of which shields the Earth from harmful space radiation. But now, a team of researchers have identified the Zwan-Wolf effect occurring on Mars. But, since Mars lacks a magnetic field, the Zwan-Wolf effect was found occurring within the Red Planet’s atmosphere, with scientists discussing these incredible findings in a recent study published in Nature Communications.
For the study, the researchers used NASA’s MAVEN (Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution) spacecraft to analyze data obtained in December 2023 involving the solar wind interacting with the Martian ionosphere. A planet’s ionosphere is the region of the upper atmosphere comprised of positively charged ions and negatively charged electrons that is created from the solar radiation colliding with the planet’s upper atmosphere and breaking apart gas molecules, with their ions and electrons free to roam.
The Zwan-Wolf effect has been observed and studied to occur within Earth’s magnetic field for several years, as the effect causes the magnetic field to squeeze from the solar wind. However, this effect has never been observed on Mars since it lacks a magnetic field. Now, MAVEN successfully observed the Zwan-Wolf effect within the Martian ionosphere when a powerful solar storm struck the Martian atmosphere in December 2023. While the researchers hypothesized that the Zwan-Wolf effect could occur regularly on Mars, these regular occurrences are undetectable with current instruments, but this powerful solar storm produced a Zwan-Wolf effect strong enough for MAVEN to detect it.
“No one expected that this effect could even occur in the atmosphere,” said Dr. Christopher Fowler, who is an assistant researcher professor at the University of West Virginia and lead author of the study. “That’s what makes this even more exciting. It introduces interesting physics that we haven’t yet explored and a new way the Sun and space weather can change the dynamics in the Martian atmosphere.”
Along with using the Zwan-Wolf effect to learn more about the Martian atmosphere and how it interacts with the Sun and solar wind, this study could provide key insights into planets lacking a magnetic field. The only other planet in the solar system with an atmosphere and without a magnetic field is Venus, which lacks plate tectonics that prevents a magnetic field from forming. This prevents heat from circulating within Venus’ interior, also called convection, which is one of two characteristics required to produce a magnetic field. The other characteristic is a liquid iron core, which Venus possesses.
Launched in November 2013 and arriving at Mars in September 2014, the MAVEN spacecraft’s primary mission objective was to ascertain how Mars lost its atmosphere, whether currently or long ago when the atmosphere was much thicker than it is today. While MAVEN went silent for unknown reasons in December 2025, MAVEN confirmed a longstanding hypothesis that the Martian atmosphere was stripped away by the solar wind, resulting in the Red Planet losing its ability to maintain liquid water on its surface.
What new insights into the atmospheric effect on Mars will researchers make in the coming years and decades? Only time will tell, and this is why we science!
As always, keep doing science & keep looking up!
News
Pleas and political attacks fill the home stretch of California governor’s race

The top candidates for California governor crisscrossed the state Friday, all venturing to friendly political territory to woo voters and undermine their rivals as the June 2 primary election fast approaches.
The top Republican in the race, former Fox News host Steve Hilton, spent the day railing against transgender athletes before a high school track event in the Central Valley, an event sure to appeal to his base of President Trump supporters.
The front-running Democrats, former Biden administration Cabinet member Xavier Becerra and billionaire environmentalist Tom Steyer, rallied one of their party’s most influential constituencies: union members.
While both stuck with mostly an upbeat message and reiterated promises to lift up Californians struggling to make ends meet, Steyer afterward accused Becerra of being “a corporate Democrat who’s taking money from all these big corporations” who “doesn’t want to change things.”
Steyer’s had good reason to go after Becerra.
A new poll from the UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies and co-sponsored by the Los Angeles Times showed Becerra leading the race with 25% support from likely voters, followed by Hilton at 21% and Steyer within striking distance at 19%. The two candidates who finish in first and second place in the primary will advance to the November general election, leaving the third-place finisher on the sideline.
Though he told reporters Friday morning that “I don’t pay attention to polls,” Steyer was energetic at a Northern California campaign event, where he held a private meeting with leaders of a union representing long-term caregivers. In brief remarks at the offices of SEIU Local 2015, Steyer described the race as a choice between a billionaire champion of working people and the corporate-backed Becerra.
“Does California work for Californians or does California work for corporations? The corporations think it works for them. They want it to continue to work for them and they’re putting up tens of millions of dollars to make sure they continue to make record profits,” he told dozens of home-care workers, teachers, construction workers and nurses at the West Sacramento gathering.
Groups including PG&E, the California Assn. of Realtors and the California Chamber of Commerce have spent more than $34 million opposing Steyer’s candidacy. The former hedge fund manager has pledged to lower energy bills by breaking up large electric utility monopolies.
As a billionaire who has so far poured $216 million of his own money into his gubernatorial campaign, Steyer has faced skepticism from some left-wing and working-class voters. But he is endorsed by progressives, including Rep. Ro Khanna (D-San Jose), and unions including the California Nurses Assn. and both major teachers unions.
“I voted for Tom. I was looking for a change,” said Alvenia Scott, a union board member who works as an in-home caregiver to her disabled sister.
“He really has some good ideas,” she said, adding that she had more qualms about Steyer’s lack of government experience than his wealth. “He made his way in life, more power to him.”
Hundreds of miles south in the Inland Empire, Becerra pledged to be on the side of unions if he is elected governor and urged voters to turn in their ballots in what has so far been a remarkably low-turnout election.
“I am with you. When I become governor and I sit behind that desk, you’ll have a union man sitting at that desk,” Becerra told about 500 people at the United Food and Commercial Workers hall in Bloomington.
He asked the crowd if they had cast their ballots and noted that not everyone raised their hand.
“Less than one in five Californians have actually cast their vote so far. We got to get that number way, way up,” he said, arguing that the election is about “sending a message all across the country that California will be counted, that California cannot be neglected, and that California will not take a knee to anyone in Washington, D.C.”
Only 12% of the state’s registered voters have cast ballots as of Thursday evening, according to the election tracking firm Political Data Inc.
Community college counselor Diego Rodriguez, 32, said he decided to vote for Becerra in recent weeks after seeing the former U.S. Health and Human Services secretary’s momentum in the race and researching his record.
“Also just his story. As someone who works in higher education, and seeing how Xavier, being first-generation, has benefited from higher education, and how he advocates for higher education,” the Rialto resident said. “Additionally, today, him being here at a labor union and advocating for the working class and labor, I think, is very important.”
Rodriguez said he first started looking into Becerra after he was among the candidates excluded from a USC debate that was ultimately canceled.
“I think that people became aware of him more because of that,” Rodriguez said. “There was a lot of conversation online regarding that, but I think it allowed the spotlight to be brought onto him and it made people aware of his record.”
At a campaign stop in Clovis in the central part of the state, Hilton marveled that his campaign had spent only about $2 million in campaign advertising but was still polling above Steyer, according to the latest Berkeley IGS survey.
“We’re feeling confident,” said Hilton, standing in a suburban stretch of the city. Still, he warned that voters need to get out to support him and avoid a “complete disaster for California” of two Democrats advancing to the November election.
Hilton, who was endorsed by Trump in April, joined other politicians and leaders in Clovis in opposing trans athletes from competing at the 2026 CIF State Track & Field Championships.
The group met near where the championship events were scheduled to take place this weekend.
Asked why he was focusing on sports and gender in the final days of the race, Hilton said it’s “one of the main issues” that come up at town halls. If elected, he said he would seek to overturn the state’s 13-year-old law that allows students to participate in school activities and use facilities such as bathrooms based on their gender identity.
Hilton argues the law violates the state Constitution and will “suspend” it while he initiates legal proceedings to overturn it.
He also praised Spencer Pratt, a Republican and former reality TV star who is running for Los Angeles mayor, saying his candidacy has brought “excitement and energy” to the state’s primary election.
“For a long time in California, there’s been this sense that it’s all inevitable — there’s nothing you can do, Democrats run this place, just the way it is,” Hilton said. “I think that that’s changing. I think there’s this sense that something’s happening.”
-
News4 days agoTrump administration sues UCLA, alleging antisemitic environment festered
-
Trending3 weeks ago2026 MLB Trade Deadline Rumors Tracker: SF Giants Shopping High-Priced Core
-
Trending2 weeks ago‘Lee Cronin’s The Mummy’ Comes to Digital, But When Will ‘The Mummy’ 2026 Be Streaming Free on HBO Max?
-
Trending2 weeks agoHeads up! Severe thunderstorm watch in effect until tonight
-
Trending7 days agoKnicks made a Donovan Mitchell adjustment the Cavaliers have no answer for
-
Trending2 weeks agoHow to watch Giants vs. Athletics
-
Trending3 weeks agoThe Mandalorian and Grogu star Pedro Pascal says his Star Wars character “knows” Baby Yoda “will outlive him,” so he’s “making sure” Grogu “can survive in a world without him”
-
Entertainment3 weeks agoReturn of the Jedi’ actor dead at 82
