
Trending
Australia hammer India by 185 runs in third women’s one-day cricket international – as it happened | Australia women’s cricket team
Key events
-
Australia win by 185 runs
-
WICKET! Charani b Wareham 11, India 224 all out
-
WICKET! Rana b Wareham 44, India 217-9
-
WICKET! Deepti Sharma lbw King 29, India 198-8
-
Alyssa Healy is having a bowl
-
WICKET! Gautam lbw King 0, India 135-7
-
WICKET! Ghosh b King 18, India 135-6
-
WICKET! Harmanpreet lbw King 25, India 115-5
-
WICKET! Deol run out (Gardner / McGrath) 14, India 110-4
-
WICKET! Rodrigues c Hamilton b Gardner 42, India 76-3
-
WICKET! Rawal lbw Sutherland 27, India 62-2
-
WICKET! Mandhana c Gardner b Carey 0, India 8-1
-
Australia set India 410 for victory
-
WICKET! Wareham c Smriti b Charani 1 (Australia 355-7)
-
WICKET! McGrath c Kashvee b Charani 2 (Australia 353-6)
-
WICKET! Gardner b Renuka 4 (Australia 345-5)
-
WICKET! Sutherland c Rana b Deepti 23 (Australia 328-4)
-
WICKET! Healy b Rana 158 (Australia 281-3)
-
WICKET! Voll c Deol b Rana 62 (Australia 136-2)
-
WICKET! Litchfield c Charani b Kashvee 14 (Australia 32-1)
-
India XI
-
Australia XI
-
India won the toss and elected to bowl
-
Preamble

Geoff Lemon
That’s it from us. We’ll have over-by-over coverage of the full women’s Test between Australia and India from the Western Australian Cricket Association ground for four days from March 6. Later, potaters.
It was a day almost all about Alyssa Healy. Yes, she will play in and captain in a Test match to end this series, but the bulk of her career, as it is for women’s international cricket, has been about the shorter formats. So her leaving the one-day arena feels, in a way, more important, like it’s the most central part.
Healy went out today with the kind of exit that will long be remembered. A big-game player in World Cup finals, yes, but to show up on your farewell day and perform, then go large, that’s something special. So often when she’s made hundreds, she has made them into huge hundreds. And so today, walking out through an Indian guard of honour to ransack 158 from 98 balls, batting until the 37th over while hitting 27 fours and two sixes, a classic Healy medley of those clean-out smites over the leg side, the flashes and back-away carves, the swivels, but really when she got off the mark with a crisp cut shot for four it suggested that this might be another of her days.
Most of her runs were made alongside Beth Mooney, who will at long last succeed Healy as keeper after a decade of waiting, and who made a century of her own today. Georgia Voll made another 50 as a member of the coming generation, and despite a late clatter of wickets in the death overs, Nicola Carey held it together to take 22 runs from the penultimate over and take Australia past 400.
India were never winning it from there, and were winning it even less when Mandhana fell early, Rawal and Rodrigues couldn’t turn a good start into something more, and then Harmanpreet and Deol sucked the air out of the innings. From that point India all but gave up, and what the purpose was of batting out so many overs with little interest in scoring, we may never know. Rana’s 44 from 74 balls and Deepti’s 29 from 47 were the epitome of futility.
Alana King bowled an excellent spell even before she had a bag of wickets, and 4 for 33 from 10 overs was fitting eventual reward. Wareham took 2 for 3. Perhaps Australia’s selectors should stop leaving out one or other of their leg-spinners.
Australia win by 185 runs
That’s the game wrapped up, and the one-day series swept 3-0. India won the T20 series 2-1. So that means the visitors can only tie the multiformat series on points, and Australia hold the trophy already so they can’t lose it.
WICKET! Charani b Wareham 11, India 224 all out
Two for Wareham, with a wrong-un to the left-hander that spins past the bat and hits off stump. Simple! Perhaps should have bowled earlier…
45th over: India 224-9 (Charani 11, Renuka 0) A couple of big wind-ups from Charani now that she has no senior player to support. One of those sends Gardner for six over wide long on, the other is stopped on the bounce by Litchfield.
WICKET! Rana b Wareham 44, India 217-9
44th over: India 217-9 (Charani 4)
Finally, Georgia Wareham gets her moment. The third ball of the over is clubbed by Charani to deep midwicket where Alana King spills the catch, very rude to do from your fellow leg-spinner. The fifth one goes right throw Rana yet somehow evades the stumps, the keeper, and goes for four byes. And the sixth has Rana step outside off stump, miss the straight skidding ball, and turn back to see it ricochet from her pad back onto the stumps.
43rd over: India 210-8 (Rana 43, Charani 2) A couple of runs from the McGrath over, as the spiral towards oblivion continues.
42nd over: India 208-8 (Rana 41, Charani 2) It might be getting damp out there in Hobart at night time, King has another ball slip from her hand and arc down as a high full toss, but terrific work from Gardner at deep midwicket stops the boundary and saves two. She comes hurtling across and gets one hand to it as she flicks it behind her body nad keeps it in, then loses the ball for a minute but tracks it down before it can roll towards the rope in a different direction.
Then a near run out, Wareham swooping at point and a direct hit on one stump, but Mooney has broken the other bail before the ball arrived! What is going on with the keeper tonight? Charani is home anyway.
41st over: India 205-8 (Rana 38, Charani 2) Another medical delay: Wareham in the deep sends a long throw back towards Tahlia McGrath, the bowler, who lets the throw go. That’s unfortunate for Rana, who has just strolled a single and has her back to the ball. It hits her right on the point of the elbow, and magic spray is required. Wareham is not impressed, and why would she be, after making no runs and not getting a bowl. “Come off it,” seems to be indicated by her facial expression.
40th over: India 200-8 (Rana 33, Charani 2) Shree Charani, the lanky curly-headed spinner, is next in the middle, away with two runs to point.
WICKET! Deepti Sharma lbw King 29, India 198-8
A yuck end to a yuck innings. King has bowled nicely, but gets a wicket with a slice of luck. A big looping full toss, dipping on Deepti, who tries to sweep it and misses. King can at least say that she was on line. It hits the batters pads on the way down, not quite as bad as Chris Rogers at Lord’s but of that parish, and it would have gone on to hit the stumps. Deepti Sharma has made 29 from 47 balls in a chase of 410, and the practical application of that innings and that approach is anyone’s guess.
39th over: India 198-7 (Deepti 29, Rana 33) May we pose a question to the Indian team? To the effect of, what, exactly, is the point of this exercise? Deepti Sharma is a player who once rather famously made 181 in this format, but tonight she has not played a single shot in anger. Sneh Rana is defending balls on off stump. What is the point? There’s no draw available. No bonus points to save or avoid conceding. No net run rate calculation. You’re still 212 runs from victory. You’re not going to win it, but the aim of the game is to score. Why not try? “Playing for pride” isn’t going to mean much if you lose by 180 after batting 50 overs or lose by 180 after batting 40 overs.
38th over: India 195-7 (Deepti 27, Rana 32) Alana King is back, with three overs remaining. She was taken off earlier with figures of 3 for 22 and then we had a Hamilton net session and faffed about with the Healy situation. Would King have wanted a break, or preferred to Adam Dale it and bowl all 10 on the trot? She’s not purring after the break, slipping one delivery outside leg stump in such a way that Rana can sweep it from a standing position for four through fine leg.
37th over: India 182-7 (Deepti 26, Rana 24) A little shovel-pull from Rana adds four from Tahlia McGrath. The bowler tries a bouncer, too high, and Mooney misses it, giving up three wides. It’s been a very untidy night for Mooney.
36th over: India 182-7 (Deepti 26, Rana 24) Deepti Sharma’s slow night adds a second boundary, this time through fine leg from Hamilton.
35th over: India 177-7 (Deepti 22, Rana 23) Maybe Healy should have left the bowling at one over. She’s carrying on for a second. It’s not great stuff. Drag down, slammed through cover by Deepti for four. Huge full toss, then another. Still finds a few dot balls to close the over, not ones that are bowled very well, but a bit short and not bouncing much and limping through. I suspect that Deepti just doesn’t want to be the answer to a trivia question about Healy’s one wicket.
34th over: India 171-7 (Deepti 17, Rana 22) Hamilton with her short ball and she badges Deepti Sharma. Attempted hook, maybe a nick on it, helmet. After a long concussion check we continue, and Hamilton bounces Rana first ball back. All in tangles trying to dodge that. This is interesting ahead of the Test match, given Hamilton is in the frame to play. Only the leg bye from the over, via the helmet deflection, so technically that’s a maiden.
Alyssa Healy is having a bowl
33rd over: India 170-7 (Deepti 17, Rana 22) She’s the captain, it’s her last one-day game, and India need 246 from 18 overs. So why not! Healy brings herself on. She’ll be bowling some off-breaks, by the looks. Bad stuff first ball, dragged down and leg side, and Sneh Rana flips it fine for four.
Much better second ball, some decent shape and it pitches outside the off stump, dot to point, dot to cover. A couple of singles, a ball that stays low, and the over goes for six – so that’s a win for the bowling side. Beyond her action through the crease, the real standout is when a throw comes in at the non-striker’s end and Healy casually receives the ball in one hand and with one smooth backhand motion knocks the bails off. That’s craft.
32nd over: India 164-7 (Deepti 16, Rana 17) Another decent over for Hamilton, going up for an lbw shout but it was nicked.
31st over: India 162-7 (Deepti 15, Rana 16) At last, some movement. Sneh Rana cracks a drive shot from Gardner, running and hitting through long-off for four. Another boundary a few balls later, Gardner trying the old Shane Warne variation, the spinner bowling a bouncer. Flicks the grip to seam-up it looks like and bangs it halfway down. But Rana nails her cut shot. So, 10 from the over, which is great when you don’t need 13 an over.
30th over: India 152-7 (Deepti 14, Rana 7) Lucy Hamilton is back. Maybe call her Lucky Hamilton, walking out on debut with 400 to defend. Easing into top level cricket. She’s testing out the middle portion of the pitch, trying her shorter ball, then what looks like a slower ball variation, running through her repertoire.
29th over: India 148-7 (Deepti 12, Rana 5) Rather going through the motions here, as the batters collect four singles from Gardner. No Georgia Wareham tonight among the six bowlers used by Australia.
28th over: India 144-7 (Deepti 10, Rana 3) Deepti Sharma sweeping King, getting a run. A rare bad ball from King follows, full toss that Rana crunches but straight to the deep cover sweeper for one. Deepti gets onto her next sweep more effectively, looks to have found the rope but McGrath dives in on her stomach, gets hands to the ball, and knocks it up into her own face and away to Hamilton on the ricochet. Saves two.
27th over: India 140-7 (Deepti 7, Rana 2) Three runs from Gardner’s over, as spin continues.
26th over: India 137-7 (Deepti 5, Rana 1) King bowls a maiden! Sneh Rana deadbats the lot. I’m not sure what the point of that is, in a format based on scoring.
25th over: India 137-7 (Deepti 5, Rana 1) Sneh Rana in next, who’s a great fighter and a very good bat, but not one with the attacking gear to tackle 11 an over for half an ODI innings. Two runs from the over. Deepti has been out there for an age and barely made a run.
24th over: India 135-7 (Deepti 4) Suddenly King has 3 for 18 from five overs.
WICKET! Gautam lbw King 0, India 135-7
Two in three balls, King looping one up as Kashvee Gautam tries to sweep and misses. Any time you do that you’re in peril with umpires, the ball going on to hit her front pad rather than back leg, which means it was towards the line of leg stump, but the ball-tracking again says umpire’s call for hitting leg.
WICKET! Ghosh b King 18, India 135-6
Now that is game over. Ghosh does get hold of King in the over, clearing her front leg to dig out a full ball over the long-on fielder for six, but two balls later King skids another ball through at off stump, much like the one that got Harmanpreet. Ghosh is not trying to block it, she’s trying to back away and cut it, forced by the required run rate to manufacture scoring chances. No dice, no contact, bowled top of off.
23rd over: India 129-5 (Deepti 4, Ghosh 12) Just not working for India. This must be one of the slower pairs between the wickets, and they have a couple of near run-outs. The runs don’t come. Three singles. They need ten and a half.
22nd over: India 126-5 (Deepti 3, Ghosh 10) Another over giving away nothing by King, who so far has conceded 12 from her four overs while India needed about 40 from them. There’s also a dropped catch, a feather from Deepti’s edge that the keeper misses standing up. Mooney has had quite a few errors behind the stumps, as she prepares for life after Healy.
21st over: India 124-5 (Deepti 2, Ghosh 9) After a few sighters, Ghosh does get going. Consecutive boundaries from Tahlia McGrath to close an over, driven through the off side. They need 286 from 29 overs, so about 10 an over.
20th over: India 116-5 (Deepti 2, Ghosh 1) There’s only one possible route to Indian victory now which is that Richa Ghosh smacks about 180.
WICKET! Harmanpreet lbw King 25, India 115-5
Lovely line, suffocatingly close to the off stump. Was that a top-spinner or did it just skid? It carries on towards the stumps, beats the forward press of Harmanpreet Kaur and pins her on the front pad just in line with off stump. The umpire gives it immediately, and a DRS review doesn’t change that. The Indian captain’s 25 off 33 hasn’t helped the cause that much.
19th over: India 112-4 (Harmanpreet 23, Deepti 1) Three runs and the run out in that over, and India’s chase looks pretty well done.
Trending
Bayern – Real Madrid, en directo: cuartos de final de la Champions League, hoy en vivo
El Madrid bate económicamente al Bayern
El Madrid busca la remontada y lo hace con un once más caro que su rival. El valor de los elegidos por Arbeloa es de 855 millones de euros por los 581 de los bávaros.
Bayern: Neuer (4); Stanisic (35), Upamecano (70), Tah (30), Laimer (32); Pavlovic (75), Kimmich (40); Olise (140), Gnabry (20), Luis Díaz (70); Kane (65).
Real Madrid: Lunin (15); Trent (65), Militao (25), Rüdiger (9), Mendy (6); Brahim (35), Bellingham (140), Valverde (120), Arda Güler (90); Mbappé (200) y Vinicius (150).
Trending
‘Liam Neeson wanted a go at being a film star. I didn’t have that in my DNA’ – The Irish Times
As I meet Ciarán Hinds, the most hearty and unaffected of actors, he is taking a day’s rest from filming in Co Wicklow.
“I’m working on Walk the Blue Fields,” he says. “The Claire Keegan adaptation by Conor McPherson, with John Crowley directing.”
Ah, yes. After An Cailín Ciúin and Small Things Like These, another Keegan story gets the big-screen treatment. The cast is stacked. Who else is in the Netflix production?
“Somebody called Emily Blunt?” he says in mock confusion. “A guy called Andrew Scott?”
He chortles to himself, as if flattered to be in such exalted company. In truth Hinds is rarely far from an “all-star cast” these days. A busy actor since leaving Belfast for the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art, in London, in the early 1970s, he has, in his golden years, happened upon a truly exhausting run of fecundity.
Only a few weeks ago he was, opposite Lesley Manville, in our cinemas with Midwinter Break. Just before that he starred as Will Arnett’s dad in Is This Thing On? You can see him in Netflix’s version of John Steinbeck’s East of Eden later in the year. He has just finished shooting Tom Ford’s Cry to Heaven, a period epic with Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Colin Firth. I could go on.
“Over the last year or two I decided to slow down and just more or less choose – if I had the choice, which I don’t often – to get involved with things if I found them interesting. And certainly I found a few things that were very interesting to me. And they just seem to have arrived at the one time.”
Here is a question. In 2022 Hinds received an Oscar nomination in the best-supporting-actor category for Kenneth Branagh’s Belfast. Has that been a contributing factor to the run of high-profile jobs? Maybe that is a question for his agent.

“You’re right, Donald. My agent and I work very intimately,” he says. “He knows what my taste is. Sometimes he says, ‘This is a paid job. This is probably something that you’d like to do.’ And we work on a very direct and personal basis.
“A couple of things came after the Oscar nomination – to turn up in action films playing the old crabby guy. Ha ha! No, I don’t need that. There are proper adventures to go on.”
But those action flicks come with perks.
“I think they might do. But I’m at a certain age where I’m not chasing perks.”
You will be more likely to see Hinds in something like this month’s The Three Urns. Directed by John-Paul Davidson and Stephen Warbeck, the lively, folksy comedy has Hinds playing an Irishman travelling, with the ashes of his late wife, from France to his old home in Ireland.
I would guess that part of the attraction was meeting up with old chums. The cast features such domestic legends as Lorcan Cranitch, Lalor Roddy, Sinéad Cusack, Jim Norton and Lisa Dwan. Quite a gang.
“I said, ‘Can I make some suggestions, if I’m going to be at the heart of it, about people I’d love to work with – to come up for a day, or a day and a half, and do two scenes?’ And they said, ‘Yeah’.
“It was good for me to be able to ask Jim Norton or Sinéad – people that I’d worked with – and say ‘Would you make your way up and get a decent bed for the night and decent dinner? Then we can go to work.’ It was really lovely.”
The story he has just told suggests he likes film sets to be social occasions. He looks to have the same attitude towards the promotional gauntlet. Stories amble into one another. Anecdotes wind their way around opinions. There is never a sense of him feeling under obligation to toe a line or act as salesman. Hinds just seems to enjoy being himself.
He was born, 73 years ago, in north Belfast to a doctor dad and a mum who did a bit of acting. Talking to him over the years, I have got the sense that he finds little to complain about in his childhood. These were the years before the Troubles kicked off, a period that is now rarely mulled over. Did it come as a shock when the violence began?
“It did come as a shock,” he says. “I went to St Malachy’s, a Catholic grammar school, and we weren’t taught ‘our history’ and ‘their history’. We were taught just history: European history, British history, Irish history.
“My parents were middle-class liberal Catholic, I guess. But they were open, and they mixed it up. Because my mom did a bit of drama herself. So they were mixing with people. They weren’t segregated.
“And my father, being a doctor, his practice was on the Springfield Road. So his patients all came from the Shankill and the Falls. We were brought up with no awareness of the huge tribal divide.”

A lot more history has passed between then and now. Belfast is buzzing in a way that he (and I, for that matter) could barely imagine during the 1970s and 1980s. Is he still connected to the old manor? Does he have a sense of those social changes? He still has family there.
“I’m aware of it,” Hinds says. “I think about this younger generational thing, about getting rid of all the orange and green history and saying ‘Can we please, for the generations to come, move the f**k on?’
“Yeah, and that’s great. That’s how it should be. But there are still chippy people up there at it again. That’s why the whole integrated-education thing is so important. We can all work together.”
There is certainly a large part of the younger generation who don’t care about the old divisions. It’s a demographic you don’t hear enough about.
“It is getting on for 30 years,” Hinds says, looking back to the Belfast Agreement. “You need to move forward – for the future of people you purport to love and care for. If you can afford to, can you not just get out more and be more open-hearted? The Fleadh Cheoil is going to Belfast for the first time this year. I think that should be a great event for everybody.”
The young Hinds briefly studied law at Queen’s University Belfast before lunging towards the acting lark. I can see him as a barrister. He has the bearing. He has the voice. Does he ever consider an alternate path where he practised that profession?
“I don’t think I had it in me to be the lawyer type,” he says. “It’s more of an intellectual pursuit.”
He had enough raw talent to make it into Rada in London. That was an exciting place to be in the aftermath of the 1960s. But there is pressure too. I imagine competition between the hungriest young actors of the era.
“There were 21 students. And they did seven terms,” Hinds says. “Kevin McNally was there. He was the brilliant one of our generation. He gave a remarkable Falstaff at the age of 19. Wow! You knew he was very special.”
McNally, still with us and still busy, became an unavoidable character actor. But others fell away. The breaks weren’t there. They maybe realised they didn’t have what it took.
“I don’t know what it was in our time, but most of them gave up when nothing was happening and retired. But before us there were wonderful actors. Alan Rickman was there. After us, then it all started. You had Kenneth Branagh and Fiona Shaw and so on. I was gone by the mid-1970s.”
It is an oddly shaped career. You could reasonably argue that, for a decade or so, Hinds was an “actor’s actor”. That is to say he worked consistently but wasn’t hugely well known outside the profession. Like Liam Neeson and Gabriel Byrne, he got an early break in Excalibur, but that did not immediately lead to movie stardom.
“I was doing theatre in Dublin,” he says. “Jim Sheridan was running the Project Arts Centre there. Jim took me into the company, where I met the wonderful actors Peter Caffrey and Johnny Murphy. John Boorman was looking around for young actors to be in Excalibur. But then I went back to the theatre. I really didn’t do much television work until the 1990s, I guess.”

Did he ever look at how, say, Neeson surged after Excalibur and wish he too could be swanning about Hollywood?
“No, no. Liam is a great friend, and I always knew Liam had it in him,” he says, amiably. “He wanted to have a go at being a film star. I didn’t have that in my DNA.”
In the mid-1980s he toured the world in Peter Brook’s legendary production of the Hindu epic Mahabharata. It was there that he met his wife, the actor Hélène Patarot (who plays his character’s lover, Mina, in the RTÉ dramedy The Dry), and they have remained together ever since.
Does having another actor in the house help? Do they bounce ideas off one another?
“I sometimes help Hélène if she wants help with dialogue,” he says. “It just turned out that I worked more than Hélène.”
Hinds laughs his self-deprecatory laugh.
“It’s strange. The opportunities she has, she goes more for quality than quantity. I’m a bit more about quantity.”

I’m not sure that’s true. There were endless highlights throughout the 1990s. He was in the first production of Patrick Marber’s controversial Closer, at the National Theatre in London. He played Richard III at the Royal Shakespeare Company for Sam Mendes. It is often overlooked that he was hugely touching as Captain Wentworth in Roger Michell’s 1995 film of Persuasion – a first shot in the late-1990s Jane Austen revival – for the BBC.
“It was a beautiful thing to be involved with,” he says. “You realise, as you get older, it’s a tricky thing to take great pieces of literature and transfer them into another medium and give it the grace and the depth.”
As the decades progressed Hinds became an increasingly unavoidable face on film and television. He is in Game of Thrones, There Will Be Blood, Munich and (of course) a Harry Potter film.
I get no sense that the greater visibility has much changed him. His daughter, Aoife Hinds, is now a busy actor. He and Patarot share their life between Paris and London. I can understand that. Hinds is a man of international tastes, but the Belfast in him remains strong. How is his French?
“Well, I did it up to A-level,” he says. “Suddenly these words unlock themselves – with the aid of some red wine. Ha ha! The neighbours are always very kind to me. I have enough to get by and converse.”
That matters. He always has a great deal to say.
The Three Urns is in cinemas from Friday, April 17th
Trending
Man Utd 1-2 Leeds United – visitors move six points clear of relegation zone
Manchester United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds UnitedGoal
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds UnitedGoal
Leeds United
Manchester United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester UnitedRed Card
Manchester United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester UnitedGoal
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Leeds United
Manchester United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Leeds United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
Manchester United
-
Trending2 weeks agoWho Are Illinois Guard Keaton Wagler’s Parents?
-
Trending1 week agoBill Raftery, college basketball’s poet laureate, calls 2026 Final Four
-
Trending2 weeks agoTexas Rangers 2026 Home Opener: How to watch and what to look for
-
Trending2 weeks agoPolice to charge suspect in fatal shooting of infant in Brooklyn
-
News2 weeks agoIf Life Exists in Venus’ Atmosphere, It Could Have Come From Earth
-
News2 weeks agoAn Aerobot With ISRU Capabilities Could Explore Venus’ Atmosphere for Years
-
News1 week ago
Stephen Miller Is Still Pursuing His Immigration Agenda, but More Quietly
-
News2 weeks agoOldest Carbon-rich Stars Open a Window to Early Cosmic Chemistry
