News
A historic $200-million USC gift from Nvidia board member aims to transform AI education
USC has received a $200-million gift from a major Silicon Valley venture capitalist and university trustee to expand artificial intelligence across campus through faculty recruitment, marking one of the largest donations in the university’s history, officials announced Tuesday.
The gift — from Mark Stevens and his wife, Mary — will rename USC’s School of Advanced Computing as the USC Mark and Mary Stevens School of Computing and Artificial Intelligence and fund a campuswide effort to make USC a national center of AI scholarship, including in film and the arts. It is also a major, early win for USC President Beong-Soo Kim, who was appointed in February.
The Stevens gift is the latest in a surge of nine-figure AI-related donations to major universities. In April, the Michael and Susan Dell Foundation gave $750 million to the University of Texas at Austin for a new medical center, including AI initiatives in health. Last month, the University of Wisconsin-Madison also received $100 million in donations for a new College of Computing and Artificial Intelligence.
In an interview, Kim said the donation comes during “an incredibly significant period of time” because AI is moving quickly from technical labs into “nearly every corner” of society. USC, he said, is positioned to compete by applying the technology across fields where the university already has strengths.
“It’s that intersection between AI and these other fields that we think is a perfect fit for USC,” Kim said, adding that the goal is for the money to help the university use AI for “positive societal impact.”
Kim said the gift will help USC recruit “world class AI talent,” but not only researchers focused on AI development. The university is seeking scholars who can use AI to accelerate work in medicine, cybersecurity, national security, business, entertainment and other fields, he said.
The president did not disclose how many faculty or researchers could be hired but said the areas would include arts, social sciences, engineering, computing and health.
In health sciences, Kim pointed to USC research in regenerative medicine, neuroimaging and Alzheimer’s disease, saying AI is helping scientists understand disease at a cellular level and identify earlier interventions. He said one of the “biggest and most exciting” areas for AI will be “medical discovery and drug development.”
USC is also pitching AI as a creative tool, a sensitive claim in Los Angeles, where writers, actors, musicians and other workers have raised fears about automation. Kim said the School of Cinematic Arts has been “leaning into this new technology” and that AI is affecting fields including music, dance and dramatic arts — though he cautioned that the focus at USC is not to replace human creativity.
“What’s so critical to me as the leader of USC is making sure that as we provide these tools and as we extend our research prowess, we’re always centering on human values and agency,” Kim said.
For Stevens, who is a trustee and an alumnus, the gift marks a major addition on top of his years-long support for USC.
Stevens, 66, is a managing partner at S-Cubed Capital, an investment holding company based in Menlo Park. As of Tuesday, his net worth totaled more than $11 billion, according to Forbes. He is a former partner at Sequoia Capital and sits on the board of several tech firms, including Nvidia. Much of his wealth comes from his stake in the chipmaker. Before entering venture capital, Stevens worked in sales at Intel and as a technical staff member at Hughes Aircraft.
In an interview, Stevens said USC’s strengths in computer science, medicine, engineering, business and the arts make the university a strong place to expand AI.
“The gift is really aimed at sort of infusing AI techniques and tools technologies into all of those disciplines,” Stevens said. “With AI, we’re only in the first inning is what I tell people. And the world, 10 years from now, will be unrecognizable to us.”
In 2004, Stevens donated $22 million to establish what became the USC Stevens Center for Innovation. In 2015, he gave $50 million for the USC Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute. USC launched the School of Advanced Computing, which is now named after him and his wife, in 2024.
Stevens said universities risk falling behind if they do not invest quickly in AI, especially because some major recent advances have come from private companies rather than academic labs.
“I think a lot of American universities are in danger of getting left behind if they don’t invest and raise money to further the AI revolution,” Stevens said.
Stevens also acknowledged the risks. “AI in the wrong hands … can be very destructive,” he said. “I think one of the jobs of universities in America is to understand, have a balanced approach, understand the guardrails and the safeguards that need to be adhered to as AI proliferates.”
Amy Eguchi, a teaching professor in the Department of Education Studies at UC San Diego who studies AI, said the gift fits into wider trends at U.S. campuses.
Universities are responding to AI in two ways, Eguchi said: by giving students and employees access to tools such as ChatGPT, and investing in AI research and applications across fields. The donation to USC, she said, reflects the second approach, even as campuses struggle with what the technology means for teaching and learning.
“The biggest issue AI creates for us as educators is that it’s harder to figure out what to do with this tool and what to do with students, because we don’t know what they need to learn at this point about AI because it’s changing so fast. And we need to focus on the best ways to use AI while not losing critical thinking skills,” Eguchi said. “Universities teach students to ask what does it mean to be human, right? But AI is complicating that question.”
Kim said a USC AI committee has been developing recommendations for classroom use, curriculum, academic integrity and ethics. He said the university is considering AI resources and courses for students in every major, along with coursework on AI’s impact on society, human values and ethics.
Some USC faculty say that expansion should proceed carefully. Sanjay Mahdav, an associate professor of technology and applied computing practice, said the gift presents an opportunity, but also raises difficult teaching questions.
“In my classes, students are increasingly using tools like ChatGPT to offload their critical thinking skills,” Mahdav said. “I honestly am unsure how to best continue to educate my students in a world where these AI tools exist.”
Mahdav said AI policies should not be imposed uniformly across campus. “Ultimately, regardless of what university-wide initiatives may come from this gift, I think it’s important that faculty continue to be able to make domain and class-specific decisions on AI use,” he said.
The debate mirrors broader concerns about whether AI will deepen learning or encourage students to outsource reasoning and problem-solving. Faculty and students have also raised worries about bias, creativity, accuracy and whether AI systems will replace forms of intellectual and professional work that colleges have long trained students to perform.
Kim acknowledged concern about the threats AI poses to human judgment, creativity and critical thinking, but said he believes USC is up to the task.
“While we see enormous opportunities for AI to enhance and save lives and address major societal problems, it also raises a number of important challenges that we need to address as a community and as a society,” Kim said. “And it’s our ambition not simply to be a university that leads in using AI… but also to be the most thoughtful university in terms of how to use AI in an ethical and responsible way.”
Times staff writer Queenie Wong contributed to this report.
News
The Federal Safety Net Isn’t Ready for Artificial Intelligence
As fears of A.I.-driven job losses mount, economists warn that unemployment benefits and other programs to help displaced workers aren’t sufficient.
News
Moon’s Formation In Many Ways Still Remains A Mystery
A half century after NASA’s Apollo 17 lunar module lifted off the Moon’s northeastern near side quadrant, planetary scientists still don’t completely understand when or how our Moon first formed.
They do agree that it involved a major impactor — an object dubbed Theia by lunar scientists — that likely struck our Earth some 4.51 billion years ago. But the estimated size of Theia now ranges from a proto-Mercury-sized object all the way up to an object that was about half the size of present-day Earth. In fact, the latest hydrodynamic models indicate that a larger impactor offers the most palatable explanation as to why the Apollo moon rocks seem to be so chemically similar to what we find in olivine-rich volcanic basalts here on Earth.
Earth was hugely affected by this massive impact; it really reset the history of our planet, Wim van Westrenen, a lunar and planetary scientist at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, tells me during a recent sit-down interview in his office.
In a giant impact, the initial Moon was just a glowing ball of magma, thousands of degrees in temperature.
It’s not even rock yet, so it must cool down before you can form minerals which we tried to date, van Westrenen tells me. He says the real question is how much time did it take post impact to form those minerals?
As van Westrenen admits that’s very difficult to pin down.
Even so, lunar scientists are still learning lots from the Apollo rock samples. The Genesis rock — a 4.46-billion-year-old rock picked up in 1971 by NASA’s Apollo 15 Moon walkers — is one of the most famous Apollo samples. It’s made almost exclusively of the white mineral plagioclase which tends to float to the top of the magma because it’s so lightweight.
You need a huge amount of magma to make a lot of the white stuff, and then that needs to all flow to the top, because now it sits on the surface, says van Westrenen. That’s the best explanation for making these white rocks, including the Genesis rock, he says.
The white plagioclase color that is visible when looking at the moon is due to the reflections of plagioclase crystals.
The fact that we have a whole body covered in plagioclases suggests that we’re actually looking at the roof of an ancient, huge body of magma, says van Westrenen.
Van Westrenen’s lab specializes in the creation of high pressures and
extremely high temperatures to analyze and recreate conditions inside the Moon in hopes of learning more about lunar geological evolution.
Our group was the first ever to provide a full experimental study of what happens when a deep magma ocean on the Moon solidifies and what minerals form at which point, says van Westrenen. We think that the whole moon was actually molten; 1700 kilometers of magma all the way down to the center, he says.
*The high pressure and high temperature chamber in van Westrenen’s lab. Credit: Bruce Dorminey*
In the lab, van Westrenen and colleagues use resistive heating to send an electric current through graphite to heat a few cubic millimeters of material to temperatures of more than 1700 degrees Celsius. That’s some five times as hot as a conventional oven. The lab can also create pressures of 250,000 Earth atmospheres.
In contrast, the Moon’s maximum internal pressure is thought to be about 50,000 Earth atmospheres which allows the researchers to virtually travel to the middle of the Moon in the laboratory.
Even so, one of the key problems in understanding the formation of our Earth-Moon system is that although hydrodynamic numerical simulations create the current Earth- Moon system’s physical properties, they fall short in matching the known bodies chemical compositions.
All the classical simulations predict that the Moon should have a very different chemical composition from what we see, says van Westrenen. The Moon rocks are far more Earth-like than they should be, he says.
As For The size Of The Moon Forming Impactor?
The paradigm now is either Earth was almost done forming, and the Moon would have been the result of a small, Mercury-sized impactor that hit our planet at a high rate of speed and a high angle. Or at that time, Earth was only half made.
So, you would have to smash in another half Earth to complete the Earth to its current size, says van Westrenen. The Moon would then have formed from a small amount of completely mixed Theia/half Earth debris left orbiting the now-completed full Earth, he says.
After the impact, lighter silicate material is thought to have formed the Moon with denser material forming the Earth and descending to make the Earth’s large iron-rich core.
*The Apollo 15 sample 15415, better known as the Genesis Rock. Credit: NASA*
That’s still correct, but these same classic 25-year-old models predict that most of the silicate rocks originated from Theia, not from Earth, says van Westrenen.
What would cause the moon to be mostly made up of Earth type material?
To make the Moon in a classic giant impact, Theia needs to hit Earth with a sort of glancing blow, where half of Theia misses the Earth, says van Westrenen.
Half crashes into the side of the Earth while the other half sort of moves past and then goes into orbit around the proto-Earth which forms the Moon, he says.
But in this scenario, the Moon should be mostly made up of rocks from the Theia impactor. But that’s not what geologists see. Theia would have to have originated from elsewhere in the solar system; thus, its chemical makeup would be different from Earth.
Yet Earth and the Moon remain strangely chemically similar.
The Bottom Line?
How the Moon formed is still not totally resolved, even though humans walked on its surface decades ago, says van Westrenen. Every human can see the Moon, but not everyone realizes that its formation is directly linked to our own planet’s history, he says.
Sources
News
SoCal 12-year-old riding e-bike seriously hurt in collision with Tesla
A 12-year-old boy riding an e-bike was seriously injured after crashing with a Tesla in San Diego on Saturday, officials said.
The boy was riding the e-bike westbound in the bike lane on Del Mar Heights Road at about 5:40 p.m., San Diego police said in a statement.
A 64-year-old man driving a 2023 Tesla Model Y was traveling in the same direction. The 12-year-old attempted to turn left from the bike lane onto Old Carmel Valley Road when he collided with the front passenger side of the Tesla, police said in the statement.
The boy suffered multiple head injuries, according to police, as well as a broken clavicle.
He was taken to a nearby hospital where he underwent surgery. Police described his injuries as life-threatening.
The department said alcohol was not a factor in the crash.
The San Diego Police Department’s Traffic Division is investigating the crash.
-
Trending3 weeks agoApril 15, 2026 – MJF vs. Darby Allin for AEW World Title, More
-
Trending2 weeks ago2026 NBA playoffs: Western Conference first-round takeaways
-
Trending2 weeks agoCincinnati Reds Minor League Game Review: April 18, 2026
-
Trending2 weeks ago2026 NFL draft intel, notes: What Adam Schefter is hearing
-
Trending2 weeks agoPeter Lambert’s six shutout innings | 04/22/2026
-
Trending3 weeks agoAsk the Developer Vol. 21: Tomodachi Life: Living the Dream — Part 1 – News
-
Entertainment2 weeks agoChristina Applegate’s friends fearing the worst as ‘hellish’ details of star’s hospitalization are revealed: report
-
Trending3 weeks agoLuka Doncic, Cade Cunningham eligible for NBA season awards
