A hot spell of weather will engulf much of California this weekend into early next week, marking this year’s first true bout of heat in many places. Some cities may hit 100 or even 105 degrees earlier in the year than ever before.
Trending
Bucks Notes: Giannis, Celtics, Cavs, Jenkins, More
People around the league continue to believe that regaining control of their own draft capital is likely to appeal to the Bucks in any potential trade involving Giannis Antetokounmpo, according to Jake Fischer of The Stein Line (Substack link).
Jaylen Brown recently reaffirmed his commitment to the Celtics after his mentor Tracy McGrady suggested the veteran wing was frustrated in Boston. While Fischer says there has been some speculation about a Brown-for-Giannis trade, he hears the Celtics only expressed “cursory interest” in Antetokounmpo ahead of the February deadline.
Fischer “never got the sense” that Boston was a real suitor for Giannis and also never got the impression that the two-time MVP was intrigued by the possibility of joining the Celtics. But if a deal involving those two players did come to pass, rival teams believe the Bucks would look to involve other teams to acquire additional assets for Brown, rather than keeping him for themselves.
Here are a few more rumors and notes related to the Bucks:
- The Celtics may or may not be a suitor for Giannis, but people around the league think the Cavaliers could be if they fail to advance past the second round of the playoffs, Fischer writes. Sources tell The Stein Line that Cleveland contacted Milwaukee about the 31-year-old power forward ahead of the deadline and the Bucks asked for Evan Mobley and all of the Cavs’ available draft capital. As Fischer notes, Donovan Mitchell‘s contract situation is very similar to Antetokounmpo’s — he’ll be extension-eligible this offseason and could be a free agent in 2027 if he declines his 2027/28 player option.
- General manager Jon Horst told reporters — including Jim Owczarski of The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (subscription required) — that Antetokounmpo didn’t meet with new head coach Taylor Jenkins during the team’s interview process, but the two have spoken. For what it’s worth, Antetokounmpo told Owczarski he endorsed the move. Jenkins is a former Bucks assistant who was the Grizzlies’ head coach for six years prior to being let go at the end of 2024/25. “I think he’s an incredible person,” Antetokounmpo said of Jenkins. “Obviously, he’s an incredible coach. I was able to be with him in 2019 and we made the Eastern Conference finals. After that he left, he was one of the first coaches that left the coaching staff and went to Memphis and he had an incredible six years in Memphis. He made them contenders in the West. He had incredible culture in Memphis. I had the conversation. I don’t think Milwaukee is just getting just a good coach, I think they’re getting a good person. And that’s where it starts with. Having a good person around that’s gonna be able to set the tone, that set the culture and what Milwaukee Bucks basketball is all about. He’s a really good coach.”
- In a separate subscriber-only story, Owczarski passes along some highlights from Jenkins’ introductory press conference, which also featured Horst and co-owner Jimmy Haslam. Jenkins said his one-year stint in Milwaukee and his respect for Horst played critical roles in his decision to rejoin the Bucks. “When this opportunity became available, I was like, I know the people,” Jenkins said as part of a larger quote. “I know what they stand for. I know what their standards are going to be on a day-to-day basis, and naturally, as we navigated this past season as a family – got to spend a lot of great quality time with them – we were very intentional about the things that matter to us, both personally and professionally. And the people, that’s the thing that really gravitated us back here to Milwaukee.”
Trending
Triple-digit heat is coming to parts of California

A high-pressure system is forecast to expand across the West next week and push temperatures to near record territory Sunday through Tuesday. Highs may be more than 20 degrees above May normals in Northern California.
A slow-building high-pressure system over the northeast Pacific will nudge into California on Thursday, but it’ll ramp up considerably Sunday once it settles over the Desert Southwest.
The hot column of air beneath the high-pressure system is expected to be among the most extreme on record in mid-May, “indicating a very rare event,” according to the National Weather Service Los Angeles.
Article continues below this ad
Daily high temperature records could be challenged anywhere from Sacramento to Las Vegas to Oklahoma City between Sunday and Tuesday.
Heat is forecast to be most extreme in the Central Valley, Antelope Valley and the Mojave and Sonoran deserts. Mid-90s to low 100s are forecast in the Sacramento Valley from Sunday through Tuesday, with temperatures as high as 105 in the San Joaquin Valley. A 105-degree reading in Fresno would be nearly a week earlier than the previous record, and more than a month before such temperatures are measured in a typical year.
Temperatures in the 70s to mid-80s in Tahoe will melt away much of what little snowpack remains in the Sierra Nevada, and nighttime temperatures will remain well above freezing.
Article continues below this ad
Unlike the record-shattering March temperatures, this won’t be a coastal heat wave.
San Francisco is unlikely to warm beyond 80 degrees. Santa Barbara, Long Beach and San Diego will be in the 70s to low 80s, with downtown Los Angeles possibly flirting with 90 degrees on Mother’s Day and Monday. Temperature gradients between the coast and valleys tend to be most pronounced from May through August as the marine layer, often filled with clouds, keeps San Francisco and Los Angeles mild.
A 30-minute drive from the beach will yield vastly different weather.
While fog lingers at the coast, Wine Country, Silicon Valley and the interior East Bay are expected to push into the 90s as early as Sunday. By Monday and Tuesday, high temperatures could be as much as 20 degrees above normal in Santa Rosa, Napa, Walnut Creek, Dublin, San Jose and Redwood City.
While these temperatures are frequent in midsummer, the early arrival could pose danger to people, as human bodies aren’t yet acclimated to summerlike heat. There’s a moderate risk of heat-related illnesses in much of the Bay Area on Monday and Tuesday. Overnight temperatures should yield more relief than a July-like heat wave. Lows are forecast to be in the upper 50s to mid-60s in the Central Valley and the 50s in the Bay Area, except in the hills above 1,500 feet, where the mercury will remain in the 60s to low 70s at night.
Article continues below this ad
Heat waves are becoming bigger, more severe and lasting longer as a result of human-caused climate change, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.
Next week’s spell of heat doesn’t appear to have the longevity of the record-shattering March event that lasted for weeks. An active jet stream — with two branches, one directed toward the Pacific Northwest and another over Baja California — should help shove this high-pressure system east. That’ll open the door for milder marine air to flood the Golden State and take an edge off the early-season heat.
Thursday breakdown
San Francisco: It’s May in San Francisco: Morning clouds, afternoon sunshine and a pronounced temperature gradient across the city. Highs will get stuck around 60 degrees at Ocean Beach, with low to mid-60s in the vicinity of Twin Peaks and near the Golden Gate, with mid- to upper 60s in the Mission and downtown. Afternoon gusts of 15 to 25 mph are expected, strongest along Ocean Avenue and near the water. Overnight lows will be in the low to mid-50s with increasing clouds and fog.
North Bay: Low clouds are expected to cover all of Wine Country and extend into Solano County in the morning. These clouds could manifest themselves as fog along the Highway 101 corridor with low visibility. Mostly sunny skies will emerge by late morning, except along the coast. Highs will be in the mid- to upper 70s in San Rafael, Santa Rosa, Napa, Vallejo and Fairfield and around 80 degrees in Vacaville, Calistoga and Healdsburg. Gusts up to 20 mph are expected in the afternoon. Lows will be in the low to mid-50s with increasing clouds.
Article continues below this ad
East Bay: Clouds are expected to push toward Alameda County and spill into parts of Contra Costa County in the morning. Blue sky should emerge between 9 and 11 a.m. Highs will reach the upper 60s in Richmond, Oakland, Berkeley and Hayward, then low 70s in Fremont and Lamorinda and the mid-70s in Concord, Walnut Creek, Antioch and the Tri-Valley. Afternoon gusts up to 25 mph are possible over Altamont Pass, with slightly lower speeds elsewhere. Overnight lows will be in the low to mid-50s with increasing clouds.
Pacific Coast and Peninsula: Marine layer stratus clouds should be fully developed in the morning, with overcast skies extending across San Mateo County. Clouds should retreat to the coast midday, leaving the Highway 101 corridor beneath sunny skies. High temperatures will be in the upper 50s to low 60s in Daly City, Pacifica and Half Moon Bay, the mid-60s in South San Francisco and Daly City and upper 60s to low 70s in San Carlos, San Mateo and Redwood City. Gusts up to 25 mph are likely in the afternoon. Overnight lows will be in the low to mid-50s with increasing clouds.
South Bay and Santa Cruz: A cloudy morning will yield to a sunny afternoon. Highs will be about 5 degrees above seasonal norms, in the low to mid-70s in Mountain View, Sunnyvale, Milpitas and Santa Cruz. Upper 70s are expected in San Jose, Scotts Valley and Boulder Creek. Highs should reach low 80s in Morgan Hill and Gilroy. Gusts up to 15 mph off the bay are anticipated in the afternoon. Overnight lows will be in the mid-50s in Santa Clara Valley and the upper 40s to low 50s in Santa Cruz County.
Trending
UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine illegally used race in admissions, Department of Justice says
WESTWOOD, LOS ANGELES (KABC) — The Department of Justice says it has evidence that UCLA’s medical school illegally considered race in its admissions process. Now, questions are being raised on how this could impact the school’s federal funding.
The DOJ is accusing UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine of discrimination. The department says it conducted a year-long investigation and found evidence that UCLA’s leadership accepted applicants to the medical school based on their race, claiming the school adhered to what it calls the “dubious contention that patients receive the best care when treated by a doctor of the same race, rather than by the most qualified.”
“We learned that UCLA medical school was improperly and illegally using race as a consideration in their admissions process,” said First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli. “This is an extension of these DEI policies that we’ve been saying are unconstitutional. The Supreme Court has ruled on this. There was a big case about Harvard admissions.”
The DOJ says the investigation found that UCLA’s medical school specifically discriminated against white and Asian American students by favoring Black and Hispanic applicants.
As part of its evidence, the department cited data showing admitted students who were Black or Hispanic had lower average grade-point averages and test scores in 2023 and 2024. Among Black students admitted in 2024, the average GPA was 3.72, for example, compared with 3.84 for Asian Americans and 3.83 for white students.
The department says that’s evidence that the medical school was using non-academic factors to achieve diversity goals.
Civil rights attorneys are criticizing the DOJ’s claims.
“Well, this is just the latest battlefront, if you will, on the Supreme Court and the Department of Justice dismantling, if you will, opportunities for racial minorities in this country to participate, be it in schools of higher education or even in the economic sphere in terms of jobs, and careers and employment,” said attorney Adante Pointer.
Essayli cited a Supreme Court decision against Harvard’s admissions policies.
“You cannot be racist in admissions. Race cannot be used as a reason why you are admitting or not admitting a student at UCLA. We are not going to put up with it,” Essayli said.
“So what you’re seeing is a political agenda playing out in real time. It has its aim focused on UCLA,” Pointer said.
The DOJ also took issue with an application document inviting students to volunteer whether they are part of a marginalized group and, if so, to discuss its impact. The question was included in the application process in 2024 and 2025, the department said.
Essayli said the DOJ plans to sue UCLA over its findings.
In a statement, UCLA said:
“The admissions process at David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA is based on merit and grounded in a rigorous, comprehensive review of each applicant. We are confident in our practices and our mission to maintain access to a high-quality education to all qualified students.
We are carefully reviewing the Department of Justice’s report. The David Geffen School of Medicine is committed to providing equal opportunity to all applicants and fully complying with federal and state laws.”
The DOJ’s investigation comes as the Trump administration ramps up scrutiny of colleges’ processes for selecting students.
The finding escalates the Trump administration’s ongoing standoff with UCLA, which has focused mostly on the main campus’s response to allegations of antisemitic harassment.
READ MORE: Justice Department lawsuit says UCLA failed to protect Jewish employees from hostility
The lawsuit is the latest escalation in the Trump administration’s campaign to punish top universities that it says have been soft on antisemitism.
Affirmative action in college admissions has been illegal since a 2023 Supreme Court ruling forbade it. The same ruling said colleges could continue to assess how applicants’ backgrounds might speak to broader characteristics, but Trump has accused colleges of using applicants’ personal statements and other proxies to consider race in admissions, which conservatives view as illegal discrimination.
In March, the DOJ opened investigations into possible race-based discrimination in medical school admissions at Stanford, Ohio State and the University of California, San Diego. The Trump administration previously targeted undergraduate admissions at selective colleges, demanding they collect data to show they are complying with the Supreme Court ruling.
California voters ended affirmative action in college admissions in a 1997 ballot measure. In a brief filed in the Supreme Court case, the UC system said the change led to a precipitous drop in underrepresented minorities, especially at the system’s most selective campuses.
The brief said UC went on to implement “numerous and wide-ranging race-neutral measures designed to increase diversity of all sorts, including racial diversity.” Even so, the system said it had struggled to increase campus diversity.
The Trump administration’s finding sets the stage for a voluntary resolution to bring UCLA into compliance with the DOJ’s legal interpretation or, if none can be reached, potential legal action. Penalties could include a loss of federal funding.
In March, a coalition of 17 Democratic state attorneys general filed a lawsuit challenging a Trump administration policy that requires higher education institutions to collect data showing they aren’t considering race in admissions.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Copyright © 2026 KABC Television, LLC. All rights reserved.
Trending
Italian Open fans erupt into boos as star confronts umpire at crucial moment | Tennis | Sport

Matteo Berrettini wasn’t happy when the umpire called a let mid-rally (Image: Tennis TV)
Fans at the Italian Open made their feelings very clear when the umpire made an unusual ‘let’ call in the middle of Matteo Berrettini’s first-round match against Alexei Popyrin. Home favourite Berrettini lost the first set 6-2 but led 15-30 on Popyrin’s serve in the first game of set two.
Berrettini looked in control during the rally and fired a forehand into the corner. But as Popyrin went to return the ball, the vibration dampener on his racket flew off and across the court. Chair umpire Aurelie Tourte called a let just as Popyrin went to hit the ball, and he sent it wide.
It meant they got to replay the point, instead of Popyrin’s shot counting and giving Berrettini a break point. And the 2021 Wimbledon finalist wasn’t happy. Berrettini marched straight to the umpire’s chair as the fans on Centre Court erupted into boos and whistles.
“The dampening device flew during the rally,” Tourte informed the crowd and the players. But Berrettini argued that it didn’t warrant a let call. “I saw it. I need to make the call. The dampening device flew from there to the net, so we play a let,” the umpire explained.
“So what? It’s never let, it’s never let,” Berrettini repeated. Tourte added: “It’s let because it stayed on his side.” Popyrin then joined Berrettini at the net as he grabbed his dampener and joined the conversation.
“It’s not because all the time it flies away, you keep playing. Alexei, you know as well,” the Italian said. But Popyrin explained that the umpire had intervened before he hit his shot. “I would have given you the point if she didn’t say let, but she said let just before I hit my forehand,” he replied.
Tourte continued to explain that she had to call a let because she saw the vibration dampener fly off Popyrin’s racket and across the court. “I saw it. If I don’t see it, I don’t call it, right?” she said. “I just saw it because it flew straight in front of me. Sometimes it goes down the side, I don’t see.”

The umpire explained that she had to call a let because she saw the vibration dampener go flying (Image: Tennis TV)
“But it’s never let when you see this thing. It doesn’t matter because it’s not a let. It’s part of the racket, so it’s never the let,” Berrettini argued. The umpire repeated her point, telling him: “Yes it is. But if I don’t see it, I don’t call it.”
Berrettini again insisted that it wasn’t a let as he returned to the baseline to replay the point. “You can understand the frustration. Feels like that would have given him break point,” commentator Naomi Broady said.
Co-commentator Lee Goodall pointed out that it was unusual for an umpire to notice a vibration dampener flying off a player’s racket, which could be why these incidents weren’t always called as a let. “Unusual set of circumstances when the vibration dampener flies off the player’s racket. I can’t remember a let being called,” he said.
“Yeah, I think it happens relatively often, but normally it pings off to the side of the court. I think the umpire was saying that it landed in the middle of the court on the side of Berrettini,” Broady replied.
And Goodall added: “So normally, a chair umpire – because they’re so small and it happens so quickly – wouldn’t even notice it. But the fact that it landed on the court, and it’s quite a vibrant colour as well. So Aurelie Tourte obviously noticed it quickly, felt she had to step in.”
EXPRESS SPORT ON FB! Get all the best sports news and much more on our Facebook page
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. Read our Privacy Policy
-
Trending2 weeks ago2026 NBA playoffs: Western Conference first-round takeaways
-
Trending3 weeks agoCincinnati Reds Minor League Game Review: April 18, 2026
-
Trending3 weeks ago2026 NFL draft intel, notes: What Adam Schefter is hearing
-
Trending2 weeks agoPeter Lambert’s six shutout innings | 04/22/2026
-
Entertainment3 weeks agoChristina Applegate’s friends fearing the worst as ‘hellish’ details of star’s hospitalization are revealed: report
-
Trending3 weeks agoAsk the Developer Vol. 21: Tomodachi Life: Living the Dream — Part 1 – News
-
Trending2 weeks agoHyeseong Kim’s RBI single | 04/24/2026
-
Trending1 week agoUpdated 2026 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs Bracket, Schedule and Top Highlights from April 29
