Trending
The Old Matt Olson Is Back
[ad_1]

On April 29, 2021, Matt Olson hit himself in the face with a baseball in the batting cage at Tropicana Field. A freak bounce off the L-screen left him with the kind of shiner an athlete can usually only acquire by going 12 rounds with Marvin Hagler, but fortunately no lasting damage. By May 2, Olson was well enough to return to the lineup, and he hasn’t missed a game since.
Olson’s consecutive games streak now stands at 820; not only is this the longest active run in baseball, he recently passed Nellie Fox for the 11th-longest streak in MLB history. Assuming he avoids any further batting practice mishaps, Olson will end the season with the eighth-longest streak ever. Only seven players in MLB history — and 10 in all of North American top-level sports — have ever played in 1,000 straight games. Olson is due to become the 11th before the All-Star break next year.
This is undeniably an impressive athletic feat. For the past five seasons — and really, close to a decade, dating back to his early days in Oakland — Olson has been good enough to demand a starting position in a big league lineup. And for good teams, more often than not. He’s taken good enough care of his body to withstand the (considerable, even for a first baseman) physical toll of a 162-game major league season, and avoided injury through impact as well as wear-and-tear. (Olson has been hit by 30 pitches during his streak, and escaped with his hamate bone intact.)
As much as I admire Olson’s commitment and dedication, I have a bit of a crank take on iron man streaks: If you literally never miss a game, you’re probably hurting the team.
Olson has been suiting up six days a week every season for five years, and while he’s not taking the beating of a catcher or middle infielder, he’s still exerting himself enough to require rest. Not a lot, but skipping the odd day game after a night game might help him save his strength for big moments later in the year.
Since Olson joined the Braves in 2022, Atlanta has won 100 regular-season games twice. But the Braves’ postseason record is 2-8, and they’ve failed to win a single playoff round since their World Series title in 2021. Olson is hitting .250/.357/.417 with two homers in those 10 games, which is just fine in a vacuum but below his normal standards.
You Aren’t a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren’t yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren’t logged in). We aren’t mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we’d like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won’t bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn’t sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don’t be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you’ll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we’ve also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn’t want to overdo it.
In 2023, the Braves won 104 games with an unusually stable lineup: All nine starting position players played at least 100 games. Eight of them played at least 138 games, and in addition to the irreplaceable Olson, both Austin Riley and Ronald Acuña Jr. played 159 games apiece.
This is, from soup to nuts, one of the best regular-season teams I can remember. The Braves not only won a division that sent three teams to the playoffs, but they won it by 14 games. Olson was unbelievable, belting a career-high 54 home runs and hitting .283/.389/.604. This was one of those seasons that bears reaching back for the old-timey stats: Olson scored 127 runs and drove in 139. Had Acuña not scrambled away with the MVP trophy, Olson would’ve made a run at the award himself.
Olson followed that season up with back-to-back 29-homer campaigns. Acuña and Riley both battled injuries as Atlanta’s win total dropped by 15 from 2023 to 2024, and another 13 from 2024 to 2025.
The more tired the Braves looked, the more convinced I became that I had been right all along: Bossman gives you all that PTO for a reason, and you’re only hurting yourself if you don’t take it.
Six weeks into the 2026 season, I find myself… chastened. The Braves are 26-12, and Olson has, without exaggeration, been the best player in the National League. He’s hitting .301/.388/.671 with 13 home runs in 38 games, and if there are fluke indicators hiding in his stat line, they’re not especially troubling.
He is swinging the bat harder than in any previous season for which bat tracking data is available. And he’s making more contact than ever (both within and outside the zone) and striking out at his lowest rate since 2021.
As you might suspect from a hitter with a 50-homer season on his CV, Olson has always had terrific raw power. His long levers and looping, graceful swing have never evinced the raw strength or violence you’ll find among the true exit velo monsters — even graceful lefties like Shohei Ohtani. Olson hits the ball hard a lot, and he puts the ball in the air a lot, and so a lot of his fly balls carry out of the yard.
In 2023, Olson posted a HR/FB% of 27.8%, second behind Ohtani among qualified hitters. Last year, that number was down to 16.0%, which was 38th in the league. This year: 23.6%. Here’s one of the 55 fly balls Olson has hit this year.
Usually, when I plug a video into a post there’s some pedagogical value — I want you to see something specific to understand the point I’m making. Not so here. I just thought you might be interested to see a guy put a baseball on the roof of the Cumberland Mall.
I’m not entirely certain what’s changed. According to Baseball Savant, he’s standing with his feet a few inches closer together than last year, with a stance that’s a couple degrees more open. Comparing the home run from above with this one from last season, the difference is subtle at best.
Whatever the cause, Olson is making better swing decisions and meeting the ball more squarely than in previous seasons. Usually, when we say a hitter is “hot,” there’s an undercurrent of acknowledgment that he’s getting lucky. Hotness, often as not, has more to do with what happens after contact than before.
That’s not really the case here. Olson is hot because he’s seeing the ball well, and he’s getting appropriate results. This is a hitter for whom a down year involves 30-odd home runs and a wRC+ in the 120s; when he gets the “NBA Jam” fireball streak going, this is what it looks like.
It’s also worth noting that Olson and the Braves have also had pretty easy competition. Atlanta has played 11 different opponents so far this season; none of them currently (as of Thursday afternoon) has a winning record. The Braves played six games against the Phillies while they were in their dead parrot phase. Olson also has four homers in seven total games at Coors Field and Chase Field, the two highest-elevation ballparks in the league.
Still, Olson has the second-highest ISO in the National League. He’s killing the ball right now, to an extent that would be noteworthy even if the Braves had only played the Westish College Harpooners all year.
In conclusion: If Olson is hitting like this, the iron man streak will take care of itself. No sane manager would take this bat out of the lineup, even for one game.
[ad_2]
Source link
Trending
Supreme Court is only way to end Trump’s control of midterms
[ad_1]
What if Trump tries to overturn election results while ignoring court orders? ‘I have such a hard time believing that would happen,’ one judge said. ‘But I think you have to consider the possibility.’
Supreme Court gives Trump win in mail ballot dispute
The Supreme Court backed part of President Trump’s executive order cracking down on mail-in ballots ahead of the midterm elections.
North Carolina will start sending out the first general election mail ballots on Sept. 4 for the Nov. 3 midterms. Whether the voters who use those types of ballots in that state and across the country get disenfranchised will likely soon be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.
President Donald Trump and his administration have been battling in federal court with voter rights groups and 24 states that are trying to prevent him from what clearly seems to be an unconstitutional federalization of our elections.
Trump, in an executive order in March, directed the Department of Homeland Security to compile state-by-state lists of eligible voters and then have the U.S. Postal Service develop rules about who can vote using mail ballots.
As always with Trump overreach, this has become a mess in every kind of way.
Trump is fighting a legal battle for control over mail-in voting
A federal whistleblower involved in the development of those rules has warned that they could cause “major disruptions” in voting and that the Trump administration seemed intent on hiding that, according to a letter to the Postal Service from U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Connecticut Democrat.
And there is also a major legal problem with Trump’s executive order: The U.S. Constitution says states run elections, not the president. Trump can’t just decide he has a new power and then act on it.
That prompts three very serious questions. Will the conservative-heavy Supreme Court stop Trump? Will Trump follow judicial orders? And will the Republican-controlled House and Senate force Trump to obey the courts?
To sort out where this goes next, I spoke to three former federal judges from the Article III Coalition, a good-government effort from Keep Our Republic to preserve an independent judiciary.
Will the Supreme Court eventually stop Trump’s election antics?
Former Judge John E. Jones III, who was chief judge for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, predicted a swift return to the Supreme Court for Trump’s executive order.
Procedural issues prompted a majority of the Supreme Court justices on Aug. 24 to block a federal judge in Boston from temporarily pausing Trump’s executive order. But by week’s end, that judge’s temporary restraining order was back in place – and Trump’s administration was appealing it.
Jones told me he expects the federal courts at every level to find Trump’s executive order unconstitutional.
“I struggle to find a scenario where the Supreme Court does anything other than find that this is a violation of Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution, in that these are executive agencies, and absent lawmaking by the Congress, the executive branch simply doesn’t have the authority to do this,” Jones said.
Retired Judge Liam O’Grady, who served in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, told me the Supreme Court might take control of the case directly, skipping over the appellate court, because the subject already reached the high court once and the midterms are looming.
“They may look at 60 days before an election and say, we now should decide this issue,” O’Grady said. “You would hope they would, because the states need direction.”
Former Judge Jeremy Fogel, who served in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, was leery of handicapping the Supreme Court on this because the justices could have put an end to the executive order the first time it reached them.
“I think they’re sending ambiguous signals,” Fogel told me. “That may be just because you’ve got justices in a lot of different places.”
Trump has spent years fighting the US voting system
Jones, who was still a judge when Trump tried to overturn the 2020 election in more than 60 court cases, said the federal judiciary had prepared back then for the potential wave of legal filings and will be ready again. And he pointed to recent controversies – aggressive federal agents demanding to inspect Wyoming’s primary election in August, the FBI’s seizure of 2020 ballots in Georgia’s Fulton County earlier this year – as potential harbingers for future cases.
“I think past is prologue, and given the administration’s repeated attempts to, in effect, federalize election administration, almost anything goes from this point on,” Jones said, adding that Trump is trying to drive a narrative that “elections are inherently fraudulent.”
O’Grady noted that the federal judge in Boston, while pausing Trump’s executive order with an Aug. 27 temporary restraining order, pointed out “that the government didn’t put in any evidence of fraud occurring in mail-in voting to substantiate the need to act so quickly.”
Fogel sees a Trump-led public influence campaign to question election integrity as a “coordinated effort to suppress the vote,” recalling how judge after judge in 2020 threw out Trump’s legal challenges for lack of evidence. He expects more of the same in November.
“I think it’s likely they’re going to use all of the levers available to prevent losing control of Congress,” Fogel said.
My last question for the judges worried Fogel: What if Trump tries to overturn the results of the midterm elections while ignoring court orders meant to stop that?
“I have such a hard time believing that would happen,” Fogel said. “But I think you have to consider the possibility that it might.”
Fogel and Jones saw two off-ramps for that kind of chaos.
For Fogel, it depends on “how much integrity” Trump’s Republican allies in Congress will show if he tries to defy court orders. Will Congress step in? “That’s the big question,” he said.
For Jones, he recalls the consequences that Trump’s attorneys faced for their actions in 2020. One big example: Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who led Trump’s 2020 legal challenges, was disbarred in 2024 for actions he took in that effort.
“Lawyers are going to have to think hard about whether they want to jeopardize, as we call in the trade, their ticket to practice law,” Jones warned. “I think lawyers are likely to be much more circumspect about diving into some of these potentially ill-considered cases because of the experiences in past elections.”
Follow USA TODAY columnist Chris Brennan on Bluesky, @bychrisbrennan.bsky.social, and on X, @ByChrisBrennan. Sign up for his weekly newsletter, Translating Politics, here.
[ad_2]
Source link
Trending
Tornado warning canceled in Burlington County, New Jersey, as severe storms hit Philadelphia region
[ad_1]
A tornado warning in Burlington County, New Jersey, was canceled Tuesday night as severe storms hit the Philadelphia region.
A severe thunderstorm watch for the Philadelphia region expired, but some severe thunderstorm warnings remain in effect for parts of the Delaware Valley.
Some of those storms will have heavy rainfall, gusty winds and frequent lightning. Heavy rain, damaging winds, hail, lightning, and even an isolated tornado are possible.
We are not yet at the point where you can shut down the air conditioning. In fact, it will likely be running quite a bit in the coming days.
NEXT big weather changes
The heat and storm chances will continue Wednesday and Thursday.
Storms will form each day and generally move from the northwest to the southeast as they ride around a large ridge of high pressure to the south.
Atmospheric conditions will be in place for severe storms at some point each day, but mainly through the afternoon and evening time frame.
All weather threats are possible across most of the region each day.
The ridge will slowly sink southward. By Thursday, a strong cold front will be able to cross the area and looks to start to push the threat for severe weather to the south, but it still includes Philadelphia and areas south.
The NEXT Weather team will be monitoring atmospheric conditions, and we’ll keep you updated with timing and impact throughout the week.
The good news is that the unsettled pattern looks to begin breaking down by Friday to make way for a relatively nice first weekend of September with highs near 80 degrees under partly cloudy skies and lower humidity levels.
Here’s your 7-day forecast:
Tuesday: NEXT Weather Alert for storms/heat. High 92
Wednesday: NEXT Weather Alert for storms. High 84, Low 73
Thursday: NEXT Weather Alert for storms/heat. High 90, Low 72
Friday: Showers south. High 87, Low 73
Saturday: Partly cloudy. High 82, Low 68
Sunday: Mostly sunny. High 79, Low 65
Monday: Mostly sunny. High 80, Low 61
Get the latest weather info on the CBS News Philadelphia app.
[ad_2]
Source link
Trending
‘Wheel of Fortune’ Announcer Jim Thornton Suspended
[ad_1]
‘Wheel of Fortune’
Announcer Jim Thornton Suspended
Published
|
Updated
Jim Thornton — the longtime “Wheel of Fortune” announcer — has been suspended by Sony Pictures Television Studios … TMZ has learned.
The studio tells TMZ … “We have recently been made aware of allegations concerning Jim Thornton. He has been suspended from Wheel of Fortune and we are recasting while we conduct a thorough investigation.”
Sony Pictures Television did not provide a reason for his suspension from the show.
However, we’ve learned the alleged incident arose while Thornton was on a commercial flight back in May, and a passenger complained to a flight attendant about Thornton.
Sources with direct knowledge tell us the pilot called ahead to have law enforcement meet Thornton when they arrived at the gate.
We’re told officers questioned Thornton — who was wearing a ‘Wheel’ jacket at the time — but he was eventually released.
American Airlines tells us, “On May 14, American Airlines Flight 1276 was met by law enforcement upon arrival at Los Angeles International Airport following concerns reported by a customer onboard.”
Thornton joined ‘WoF’ in 2011 after the death of longtime announcer Charlie O’Donnell — who was with the show from 1975 to 1980 and 1989 to 2010.
While mostly heard and not seen on the program, Thornton did host one segment of a 2023 program when one of the contestants — a woman named Sarah Ward — wanted to meet him. Pat Sajak, then the host of the show, served as an announcer for the round.
Thornton also served as an announcer briefly on “The Price Is Right,” “The Soup,” and “The Cleveland Show.” He also lent his voice to Pixar for the classic animated movie “Monsters, Inc.” … serving as a commercial announcer in the flick.
We’ve reached out to Thornton … so far, no word back.
[ad_2]
Source link
-
Trending1 week agoAvs’ Cale Makar worth every cent, but pressure is on to deliver Stanley Cup
-
Trending2 weeks agoHow Alabama beekeepers made some ‘un-bee-lieveable’ movie magic
-
News2 weeks ago
Frank Beard, Beardless Drummer for ZZ Top, Dies at 77
-
Trending3 weeks ago‘House of the Dragon’ Showrunner on the Season 3 Ending, Series Finale Plans
-
Trending2 weeks agoHow Valkyries star Gabby Williams has enjoyed offensive breakout
-
Trending2 weeks agoRed Sox-Diamondbacks lineups, preview for August 19, 2026
-
Trending3 weeks agoKaitlin Olson on the ‘Hacks’ Finale and Losing Her Father
-
News3 weeks agoSoCal man dismembered mom’s body, put it in trash, is found not guilty



